Adrian Brockless wants a recognition of human value in political debate.
https://philosophynow.org/issues/166/Trust_Truth_and_Political_Conversations
Trust, Truth & Political Conversations
-
Philosophy Now
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:49 am
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5775
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Trust, Truth & Political Conversations
some humans are worth more than other humans... just ask the guys with the bigger guns
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Trust, Truth & Political Conversations
Big guns not required. As a subjective label, everyone gets an opinion on the "value" of anything and anyone.Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 11:40 pm some humans are worth more than other humans... just ask the guys with the bigger guns
-Imp
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5775
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Trust, Truth & Political Conversations
everyone gets to label subjectively... who gets to continue after the labelling (and whose label takes precedence) is the question...
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Trust, Truth & Political Conversations
No that's "a" question. A big one in the world, a miniscule one in Philosophy.Impenitent wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 10:34 pm everyone gets to label subjectively... who gets to continue after the labelling (and whose label takes precedence) is the question...
-Imp
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5775
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Trust, Truth & Political Conversations
to be or not to be...
-Imp
-Imp