Philosophy Now Forum

Project Support;
Cash only, Small Unmarked bills, to . . . . .

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:09 pm Project Support;
Cash only, Small Unmarked bills, to . . . . .

...honestly, after what I've been going thru since da bank decided to lock my card - which included ALL my online payments - because apparently someone at 3am tried using my details to book an uber - and it auto triggered a fraud lock.

I now have to wait about 10 days to get a new card. I only had $100 in my wallet, when I went shopping I thought I had $250 and ended up rather embarrassed as I held up a Q of people looking at me like I'm some cheap arse that can't afford shopping - I had to split the basket so the total was within reach of my cash.

The bank did not even text message notify me of a lock. I found out the hard way - when I called their fraud dept, some stupid WOMAN (accelafine) stated immediately it wasn't a fraud thang that was causing the issue - wot did she do- she transferred me BACK to the Q for FRAUD!!

I had to hang up - finally got a bloke called Stephen, an Ozi within a few mins he determined that YES a fraud lock was on my f'ing account!!

Word to the wise - stash at least $1000 somewhere in your house because shit with electronics hits the fan far too often. I've also opened another trans account for another card as a backup in future.

WOT IS THIS WORLD OF DOOOPIDITY - they lock your account down NOT for your benefit - they know they will cop the losses ultimately so we must bare the brunt of their daft auto locks - a bloody fraud uber trip has almost screwed my overseas bookings, luckily I have a couple of weeks up my sleave to sort this crap out.

I see you have never asked the questions:

When does a voluntary agreement become a weapon for one party to enslave the other? Have you ever even read the Constitution of the United States?
Cleary unconstitutional enforcement by the government has been going on since the agreement.

Its whole mechanism is based on literacy. How we actually use words contrary to any agreement at all. The Constitution is actually invalid.

The only way to change mankind's behavior is through education.

So, let me make it simple for you. Does a parent have the right to sell their own children into slavery?

What you have done to yourself, you will certainly do to your own children.

This is what I call, the inability to think one's way out of a paper bag. It is a metaphor.

Hello Phil...how goes it?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:39 pm Does a parent have the right to sell their own children into slavery?

Of course not. Parent is not synonymous with owner.

The child belongs to himself. The parents are his stewards. They protect and further, not own and use.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:06 pm Hello Phil...how goes it?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:39 pm Does a parent have the right to sell their own children into slavery?

Of course not. Parent is not synonymous with owner.

The child belongs to himself. The parents are his stewards. They protect and further, not own and use.

You cannot support that theses, as the foundation of every government is taken such that every one's children are bound by an agreement they never made.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:23 pmYou cannot support that theses, as the foundation of every government is taken such that every one's children are bound by an agreement they never made.

You'll have to bring me up to speed on what you're talkin' about, Phil. I haven't been following your threads or posts.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:27 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:23 pmYou cannot support that theses, as the foundation of every government is taken such that every one's children are bound by an agreement they never made.

You'll have to bring me up to speed on what you're talkin' about, Phil. I haven't been following your threads or posts.

You will find most of my post on the general forum. I will not repeat them here.
Suffice it to say,

A house divided cannot stand
Yet every government today is founded on keeping people divided from knowing truth and how to be true.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:30 pmYou will find most of my post on the general forum. I will not repeat them here.

And I won't go a'huntin' for them there.

*shrug*

every government today is founded on keeping people divided from knowing truth and how to be true.

I agree (and I think it's a damn sight worse than that).

Anyway, good talkin' with you, Phil.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:34 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:30 pmYou will find most of my post on the general forum. I will not repeat them here.

And I won't go a'huntin' for them there.

*shrug*

every government today is founded on keeping people divided from knowing truth and how to be true.

I agree (and I think it's a damn sight worse than that).

Anyway, good talkin' with you, Phil.

Thank you for revealing to everyone the amount of effort you would go through to save children.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:40 pm Thank you for revealing to everyone the amount of effort you would go through to save children.

Oh my. If I don't hunt down your post, I don't care about kids, yeah?

That there is the most obvious, and poorly executed, attempt at guilt trippin' I've ever seen.

Like an Ed Wood flick, it's so bad, it's good.

Definitely worth a

'nuff said.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:51 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:40 pm Thank you for revealing to everyone the amount of effort you would go through to save children.

Oh my. If I don't hunt down your post, I don't care about kids, yeah?

That there is the most obvious, and poorly executed, attempt at guilt trippin' I've ever seen.

Like an Ed Wood flick, it's so bad, it's good.

Definitely worth a

'nuff said.

I totally agree with you, everyone else is responsible for how you respond to the environment. NOT!
I only stated the obvious, what you made of it, reveals your own response. Every person is responsible for their own behavior. And if anyone points out the sum of that behavior, is it a lie? Or is it just grammatical fact?

If you even took the time to learn about this forum, you would know that you can click on the link in anyone's name and find a list of all their postings on the website. so, nothing need repeating and no one really has to look to find anyone's complete list of posts.

Hey, you know, it is like, man, will you do more work for me than I clearly would do for myself? Will you willingly devote more time to me, because clearly, like man, I am such a fragile thing, Push a button on my keyboard? You know how exhausting that is, Give po helpless me, a hand.

Fuck off.

Hell. When did panhandling become unprofitable?

Back in the 70's I was with some panhandlers, and panhandling was, maybe still is illegal in Toronto. So, a cop car pulls up and tells everyone the Law. And one among us went up to the window of the police car and said, I know it is illegal, I want a quarter!
Well he got a warm cell and food for the night and I wonder, was he not really paid for breaking the Law?

Ever notice that the word Illegal is comprised of three words, ill e and gal. Now why hasn't anyone noticed that it is sexist?