The Philosophy Discussion Forum

We are one of a group of life support systems of a living organism. As such we have a well defined biologically determined job to perform and well defined physically determined means of doing out own work.
A true Philosophy forum would be based on these two facts. These two facts are the standard, taught and recognized by the JCS (Judeo Christian Scripture) and Plato.

A true forum would have, if not its own library publicly free and available, dedicated not to who said what, but to maintain and promote the doing of our own work, then at least it would link to such work. It would not link to who said what, but how to do our own work.

Doing our own work is the primary interest of a Philosopher.

As a Mind, we have a well defined biologically determined job to perform and well defined physically determined means of doing that work.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:31 am We are one of a group of life support systems of a living organism.

Just CLAIMING 'this' is on thing, but BECAUSE you KEEP FAILING to EXPLAIN what you human beings are, SUPPOSEDLY, 'a group of life support systems' OF, EXACTLY, you "phil8659" are NOTHING MORE than A IMAGINING being, WITHOUT ANY SUBSTANCE.

AND, you human beings are NOT ANY 'life support system' OF ANY 'living organism'.

There is NOT a 'living organism' in the WHOLE Universe, and even including the 'living organism' Universe, Itself, that relies ON you human beings.

you are just ANOTHER one who has a Truly False BELIEF and IMAGINATION that you human beings are of some IMPORTANCE, here. you human beings are NOT so-called 'life support systems' for ABSOLUTELY ANY thing AT ALL.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:31 am As such we have a well defined biologically determined job to perform and well defined physically determined means of doing out own work.

Just LOOK AT HOW MUCH ALLUDING 'this one' DOES, WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY CLARIFICATIONS, nor DEFINITIONS.

Why do you ALLUDE TO some CLAIMS? Why not just be SPECIFIC, and EXPLAIN and CLARIFY, especially considering that you are being ASKED TO?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:31 am A true Philosophy forum would be based on these two facts. These two facts are the standard, taught and recognized by the JCS (Judeo Christian Scripture) and Plato.

WHAT , SUPPOSED, 'two facts'?

your OPINIONS and/or CLAIMS, here, are NOT 'facts' AT ALL.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:31 am A true forum would have, if not its own library publicly free and available, dedicated not to who said what, but to maintain and promote the doing of our own work, then at least it would link to such work.

SO, why do you NOT OPEN UP or START a so-called 'true forum'?

Do you NOT have THE ABILITY TO?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:31 am It would not link to who said what, but how to do our own work.

But, you do NOT even do your OWN WORK, BY DEFINING, EXPLAINING, BEING CLEAR, and CLARIFYING things, here

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:31 am Doing our own work is the primary interest of a Philosopher.

ONCE MORE, your OWN UNSUPPORTED OPINIONS and/or CLAIMS are NOT 'facts'.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:31 am As a Mind, we have a well defined biologically determined job to perform and well defined physically determined means of doing that work.

you KEEP CLAIMING 'this' BUT NEVER EXPLAIN what this SUPPOSED and ALLEGED 'job' even IS, EXACTLY?

And, you NOT EXPLAINING, WHEN you ARE ASKED TO, just SHOWS and REVEALS that you do NOT EVEN KNOW what you are talking ABOUT and CLAIMING, here.