Philosophy Now Forum

Gender Philosophy
Now, someone paired those two words, however, as Plato noted the simples sentence is comprised of a noun and a verb like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc., However, Gender is a noun, Philosophy is a Noun, so it is not even close to being anything resembling anything grammatical.
So, maybe the person who wrote it could write something intelligible, because I know my crotch can neither read nor write. Nor does Philosophy have a gender. Secondly, A mind does not have a gender, as it has the very same function as any other mind, information processing exactly like any other mind, and the Grammar used to process information does not have a gender either.

So, what is up pasting two words together which leaves me scratching myself.

And, if you are wondering that I reference Plato and you shrink at the reference, try almost any grammar book today, of which I have a virtual collection of, they will tell you the same thing.

All the high IQ people went and had the dialogue. Without you.

Thanks but I'll be sitting this one out, Phil.

I have a thread on motorcycles, btw. You can post there whenever you want, man. In my motorcycles thread I mean...because I do have one.

Socrates asks, I drank what?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:57 am Gender Philosophy
Now, someone paired those two words, however, as Plato noted the simplest sentence is comprised of a noun and a verb like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc., However, Gender is a noun, Philosophy is a Noun, so it is not even close to being anything resembling anything grammatical.
So, maybe the person who wrote it could write something intelligible, because I know my crotch can neither read nor write. Nor does Philosophy have a gender. Secondly, A mind does not have a gender, as it has the very same function as any other mind, information processing exactly like any other mind, and the Grammar used to process information does not have a gender either.

So, what is up pasting two words together, which leaves me scratching myself.

And, if you are wondering that I reference Plato and you shrink at the reference, try almost any grammar book today, of which I have a virtual collection of, they will tell you the same thing.

Excellent, I am surprised this topic got as far as it did----- lol!! Better it should be termed gender wars, and consult the art of war.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:57 am Gender Philosophy
Now, someone paired those two words, however, as Plato noted the simples sentence is comprised of a noun and a verb like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc., However, Gender is a noun, Philosophy is a Noun, so it is not even close to being anything resembling anything grammatical.

Yet, here it is "phil8659" who was 'the one' who SAID and WROTE, 'Gender philosophy'.

So, if some thing does NOT even resemble ANY thing grammatical, then I suggest 'you' do NOT SAY, and WRITE, 'it', especially, here, in a 'philosophy forum'.

So, how about you TRY 'this', again?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:57 am So, maybe the person who wrote it could write something intelligible, because I know my crotch can neither read nor write. Nor does Philosophy have a gender. Secondly, A mind does not have a gender, as it has the very same function as any other mind, information processing exactly like any other mind, and the Grammar used to process information does not have a gender either.

Firstly, God has a gender. And, for VERIFICATION OF 'this', you only have to ASK "immanuel can".

Secondly, if you, seriously, want to CLAIM that there are 'minds', then you WILL HAVE TO EXPLAIN what are these 'mind' things, EXACTLY. That is; if you WANT TO BE TAKEN 'seriously', here.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:57 am So, what is up pasting two words together which leaves me scratching myself.

Well you are the ONLY one who is so-called 'pasting' those two words together, here. So, if you REALLY WANT TO STOP 'scratching', and those two words together, somehow MAKE you scratch, then best you just STOP putting those two words together.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:57 am And, if you are wondering that I reference Plato and you shrink at the reference, try almost any grammar book today, of which I have a virtual collection of, they will tell you the same thing.

Even the first part of your sentence, here, you just can NOT even get Right, nor 'grammatically correct' if one prefers.

popeye1945 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:47 am Better it should be termed gender wars, and consult the art of war.

In a sense, war is a giant shit test.

So, what exactly does it test? Well, war always tests if you can successfully replace the dead bodies. War is a necessary tool to prevent dysfunctional societies from perpetuating themselves.

A gender war means that reproduction slows to a crawl. So, it preannounces that a society will spectacularly fail on the next shit test.

The asteroid is indeed already on its way.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:57 am Gender Philosophy
Now, someone paired those two words, however, as Plato noted the simples sentence is comprised of a noun and a verb like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc., However, Gender is a noun, Philosophy is a Noun, so it is not even close to being anything resembling anything grammatical.
So, maybe the person who wrote it could write something intelligible, because I know my crotch can neither read nor write. Nor does Philosophy have a gender. Secondly, A mind does not have a gender, as it has the very same function as any other mind, information processing exactly like any other mind, and the Grammar used to process information does not have a gender either.

So, what is up pasting two words together which leaves me scratching myself.

This is the type of argument one makes when they don't have any arguments left to make against the insanity of transgenderism. But there are much better arguments to make, namely that they can't even define what a woman or man is and when they do they use all the sexist tropes available to define what a woman and man is, not to mention the distinction between sex and gender that is tried but then they go and show that there is no distinction by their own actions in describing modifying your biology as "gender affirming".

There are so many contradictions being made by trans-activists that it invokes Orwell's 1984 in the mind with the Party's core slogans, "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength," that are used to control the population through propaganda and the manipulation of truth, showcasing the Party's ability to hold contradictory beliefs as truths. The state states that men are women and women are men and we are suppose to accept it without question or be "canceled".

Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 12:38 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:57 am Gender Philosophy
Now, someone paired those two words, however, as Plato noted the simples sentence is comprised of a noun and a verb like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc., However, Gender is a noun, Philosophy is a Noun, so it is not even close to being anything resembling anything grammatical.
So, maybe the person who wrote it could write something intelligible, because I know my crotch can neither read nor write. Nor does Philosophy have a gender. Secondly, A mind does not have a gender, as it has the very same function as any other mind, information processing exactly like any other mind, and the Grammar used to process information does not have a gender either.

So, what is up pasting two words together which leaves me scratching myself.

This is the type of argument one makes when they don't have any arguments left to make against the insanity of transgenderism. But there are much better arguments to make, namely that they can't even define what a woman or man is and when they do they use all the sexist tropes available to define what a woman and man is, not to mention the distinction between sex and gender that is tried but then they go and show that there is no distinction by their own actions in describing modifying your biology as "gender affirming".

There are so many contradictions being made by trans-activists that it invokes Orwell's 1984 in the mind with the Party's core slogans, "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength," that are used to control the population through propaganda and the manipulation of truth, showcasing the Party's ability to hold contradictory beliefs as truths. The state states that men are women and women are men and we are suppose to accept it without question or be "canceled".

Words are a tool, they are used for memory management so that we can control our own behavior. Gender is defined biologically, it is just one facet, one part of a person's body they either use correctly or not. It no more a part of the mind than your foot its.
Words a part of a tool by which we regulate our own behavior. That is why you teach people the correct use of names. Not to paste words together as you do, imagining that words, in of themselves have any power at all.

Psychology is commensurate with the principles of language functionally resident in the mind as our Grammar Matrix. In short, a Universal binary expressed in four distinct ways of utilizing binary recursion in order to know every possible consequence of any behavior.

You newer practiced geometry.

Philosophy is learning how to be literate. There is no difference between binary and binary, all of these differences you speak of only indicate a state of illiterate delusion.

So, you probably did not either read, or understand Confucius's Rectification of names, so let me reword it.

If a person cannot use words correctly, they cannot possibly regulate their own behavior correctly, if people cannot regulate their own behavior correctly, they are a danger not only to themselves, but their entire environment, animate and inanimate. A mind is a life support system, potentially the most powerful possible, it is used to predict the results of behaviors before hand, predictive behavior, prophecy, philosophy, reasoning, and has many names. So if a mind cannot do its job, it is because of 2 and only 2 reasons. 1 they were born too stupid to learn, or 2 they could find no one smart enough to help them learn.

What is the only thing a mind can do? It is called virtual model making so that we can choose the best way to behave.

Only one known species can symbolically separate its physical traits and behaviors from its conceptions.
Cartesian dualities express a subconscious body/mind dissonance.
The linguistic separation of sex from gender is an example of distancing the real from the ideal.

Pistolero wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:42 am Only one known species can symbolically separate its physical traits and behaviors from its conceptions.
Cartesian dualities express a subconscious body/mind dissonance.
The linguistic separation of sex from gender is an example of distancing the real from the ideal.

So, what IS, ACTUALLY, 'real', FROM what IS, JUST, 'the ideal', here, EXACTLY?

Real is what is independence of subjective perspectives - Kant's noumenon.
Ideal are subjective projections of interpretations of noumena, i.e., phenomena....often they are projections of what ought to be, or what a man prefers to be so.

Most men live in their heads, seeking inter-subjective supports groups, for their preferences.

Best way to evaluate the accuracy of your perceptions is to apply them, measuring the consequences against your expectations.
If the gap is great, then you must adjust your subjective views, because the objective world will not yield to your preferences.

For the low IQ person to scratch his head:

As Plato noted, the simple sentence is comprised of a noun and a verb like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc.
Sits is a plural noun, which is defined as: "a period of sitting." Walks is a plural noun, which is defined as: "an act of traveling or an excursion on foot."

So, why would someone paste two nouns together like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc.

Lets Try this again, for all the High IQ people here

But, there are none, here, bar 'you', right?

night912 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 2:28 pm
So, why would someone paste two nouns together like, Socrates sits, Socrates walks, etc.

To not sound clunky.

For the purpose of looking to the meaning and not just the words.
If you’re just looking to the words, then more words are required.

For example:
Socrates sits for a period of sitting.
Socrates walks to travel or take a foot excursion.