The Philosophy Discussion Forum

One of the items which one will find in the JCS, Judeo-Christian Scripture, are various metaphors telling us how many categories of Grammar there are, However, most people cannot really read metaphor. So, let us reason it out.
Every system of grammar is a method of utilizing simple binary recursion, for every grammar is derived from the binary definition of a thing as a relative constrained by correlatives.
So, if we take the intelligible binary of Language and multiply it with the Binary construct of a Grammar system (symbol sets and our behavior of recursively applying them) We have four, and only four, basic categories of Grammar which have traditional names: Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.
And as binary recursion can only produce a binary result, one should realize that none of these grammars, can possibly contradict the other. We contradict all the time, but that is our illiteracy, not the grammar.

So, instead of using just common grammar to confuse yourself by speaking and thinking gibberish, learn to say the same about the same, in each of our grammar systems. Both the JCS and Plato recommended Geometry as Geometry is effected by an arithmetic identity between the elements of a thing and the behavior of the hand. You can actually draw a computer and the output will be concurrent with the input, i.e., no processing time, and every answer is exact, i.e., every answer is rational.

It is painful to watch a bunch of grown ups think and speak gibberish on this website, while having the nerve to call the heap of nonsense, philosophy.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:18 am Every system of grammar is a method of utilizing simple binary recursion, for every grammar is derived from the binary definition of a thing as a relative constrained by correlatives.

What is the binary definition of a DOG?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:33 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:18 am Every system of grammar is a method of utilizing simple binary recursion, for every grammar is derived from the binary definition of a thing as a relative constrained by correlatives.

What is the binary definition of a DOG?

Plato demonstrated how to reduce any complex thing into a series of definitions. Try reading for learning, after all Plato was the founder of formal Grammar. I have done several compilations, from several translations of his dialogs, they are all free on the Internet Archive.
If you want to know something, give off your lazy ass and learn it from good teachers, if they cannot teach you, it is because you lack the intelligence to learn.
Internet Archive, Phil8659. Plato Half a Loeb, Plato in the Nude, etc., all posted and edited for machine reading by me. So, you can actually listen to them and have your computer read them to you while you fall asleep.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:41 am Plato demonstrated how to reduce any complex thing into a series of definitions. Try reading for learning, after all Plato was the founder of formal Grammar. I have done several compilations, from several translations of his dialogs, they are all free on the Internet Archive.
If you want to know something, give off your lazy ass and learn it from good teachers, if they cannot teach you, it is because you lack the intelligence to learn.
Internet Archive, Phil8659. Plato Half a Loeb, Plato in the Nude, etc., all posted and edited for machine reading by me. So, you can actually listen to them and have your computer read them to you while you fall asleep.

Irrelevant condescending waffle.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:18 am Every system of grammar is a method of utilizing simple binary recursion, for every grammar is derived from the binary definition of a thing as a relative constrained by correlatives.

What is the binary definition of a DOG?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:43 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:41 am Plato demonstrated how to reduce any complex thing into a series of definitions. Try reading for learning, after all Plato was the founder of formal Grammar. I have done several compilations, from several translations of his dialogs, they are all free on the Internet Archive.
If you want to know something, give off your lazy ass and learn it from good teachers, if they cannot teach you, it is because you lack the intelligence to learn.
Internet Archive, Phil8659. Plato Half a Loeb, Plato in the Nude, etc., all posted and edited for machine reading by me. So, you can actually listen to them and have your computer read them to you while you fall asleep.

Irrelevant condescending waffle.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:18 am Every system of grammar is a method of utilizing simple binary recursion, for every grammar is derived from the binary definition of a thing as a relative constrained by correlatives.

What is the binary definition of a DOG?

Well, if you want to see how to obtain a single definition of complex geometric figures using algebra and arithmetic, see Universal Grammar and the Ari of Prophecy at the same place, authored by me.
It is an encyclopedic work by me, and it too will demonstrate the process. So, I have given you four different grammar systems to learn the answer to your question, make you the only irrelevant condescending waffle begging, ling a whino, for syrup.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:51 am Well, if you want to see how to obtain a single definition of complex geometric figures using algebra and arithmetic, see Universal Grammar and the Ari of Prophecy at the same place, authored by me.
It is an encyclopedic work by me, and it too will demonstrate the process. So, I have given you four different grammar systems to learn the answer to your question, make you the only irrelevant condescending waffle begging, ling a whino, for syrup.

So you actually cannot define any THING, that is not binary in a binary way, such as providing a binary definition of a DOG.


AGAIN:

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:18 am Every system of grammar is a method of utilizing simple binary recursion, for every grammar is derived from the binary definition of a thing as a relative constrained by correlatives.

What is the binary definition of a DOG?