The Philosophy of Baklava
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:54 am
Once upon a time, in a far off land, lived a wanderer, who, eventually settled down and became the founder of Formal Grammar, which he called Dialectic, or speech in accordance with the two elements of a thing, a relative and its correlatives. Thousands of years later, a machine was built demonstrating dialectic, and it became known as Binary Recursion.
Now, how is it that a person could distinguish between 0 and 1, but not between a noun and a verb? The only difference is the name of the intelligible element?
The founder of Formal Grammar defined the work of a Philosopher to be Dialectic, again speech in accordance with the two elements of a thing. He also said that Dialectic was over ALL the sciences of Man, in other words, it was the limits of human linguistic functionality which is today proven by the computer as by binary alone, it can process all information. Yet neither founder of Formal Grammar, nor the computer, unless it is broken, will ever claim the the noun is contained in the verb, or that the 0 is contained in the 1.
So, no one, who is literate could ever claim that a universal, the noun, is a particular, i.e., there is no such thing as The Philosophy of this, or the Philosophy of That, just like one can never say, that a point is a part.
Sp. I suggest that we get a cup of coffee, or a glass of milk, and grab the philosophy of Baklava, and enjoy our snack, while we hunt for a real job.
Now, how is it that a person could distinguish between 0 and 1, but not between a noun and a verb? The only difference is the name of the intelligible element?
The founder of Formal Grammar defined the work of a Philosopher to be Dialectic, again speech in accordance with the two elements of a thing. He also said that Dialectic was over ALL the sciences of Man, in other words, it was the limits of human linguistic functionality which is today proven by the computer as by binary alone, it can process all information. Yet neither founder of Formal Grammar, nor the computer, unless it is broken, will ever claim the the noun is contained in the verb, or that the 0 is contained in the 1.
So, no one, who is literate could ever claim that a universal, the noun, is a particular, i.e., there is no such thing as The Philosophy of this, or the Philosophy of That, just like one can never say, that a point is a part.
Sp. I suggest that we get a cup of coffee, or a glass of milk, and grab the philosophy of Baklava, and enjoy our snack, while we hunt for a real job.