Page 1 of 3
In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 6:08 pm
by Fairy
Yes, he’s right about God.
God is real. I believe.
This is no bs, I’m being serious.
I’ve changed my mind about God. God exists, and Immanuel Can is right.
Even if God is a just a belief, that belief is a just belief. You wouldn’t know belief or be able to have them if they weren’t real.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 6:32 pm
by Fairy
Also, I’ve for the longest time droned on an on about the teachings that is Nonduality.
Mannie said to me in some past dialogue with him his thoughts about nonduality not making any sense. He was right.
I admit wholeheartedly and with sincerity that I was wrong about Nonduality, it really doesn’t make any sense.
Only relationship with God makes sense, I know that now. I believe.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:03 pm
by Gary Childress
Immanuel is a good guy. I hope there is a God. The world needs a lot of divine help right now, I think.

Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:02 pm
by Fairy
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:03 pm
Immanuel is a good guy. I hope there is a God. The world needs a lot of divine help right now, I think.
Does good exist? Yes, it does. That’s all that’s needed, thank goodness. Feeling good? That’s good then.
If you don’t feel good, then why wouldn’t you want to feel good? Just feel good, it’s a good feeling, try it.
If you don’t like feeling good, then you won’t, and you could always end your own life if you don’t want to live to feel good. That’s why you have choices. You can choose to feel good, or you can choose to not feel anything at all.
Ask yourself, what do you really want to feel.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:07 pm
by Fairy
I’m not literally defending IC as a human character I’m sure he’s a lovely human.
I’m defending IC the messenger of Gods words. Anyone who believes in God, is right to believe because God is real.
Anyone who doesn’t believe God is real is still a perfect expression of love. God is love.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:13 pm
by Gary Childress
Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:07 pm
I’m not literally defending IC as a human character I’m sure he’s a lovely human.
I’m defending IC the messenger of Gods words. Anyone who believes in God, is right to believe because God is real.
Anyone who doesn’t believe God is real is still a perfect expression of love. God is love.

Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:20 pm
by Fairy
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:13 pm
Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:07 pm
I’m not literally defending IC as a human character I’m sure he’s a lovely human.
I’m defending IC the messenger of Gods words. Anyone who believes in God, is right to believe because God is real.
Anyone who doesn’t believe God is real is still a perfect expression of love. God is love.
There’s just love Gary.
Nothing bad will happen to love it’s unconditional. It’s infinitely abundant and eternal.
Love always wins, it can’t be destroyed.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:30 pm
by Fairy
When there’s no personal desire for what’s in this love for a me, love is the only thing that’s left,inevitably.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:59 pm
by Gary Childress
Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:20 pm
Love always wins, it can’t be destroyed.
I hope so. If that is true, then there is truly something odd about the world that random chance and accident can't explain. I hope there is a God and that love will prevail. I wish I could say more, but I'm a piece of shit. I don't know what the f*** I'm doing in this world.

Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 10:15 pm
by Fairy
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:59 pm
Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 9:20 pm
Love always wins, it can’t be destroyed.
I hope so. If that is true, then there is truly something odd about the world that random chance and accident can't explain. I hope there is a God and that love will prevail. I wish I could say more, but I'm a piece of shit. I don't know what the f*** I'm doing in this world.
I’m a piece of shit as well as the lotus flower feeding off it.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2025 10:24 pm
by Fairy
Can you feel the feeling of feeling good?
I can. Immanuel Can is I too.
Everyone is I
Can I feel good? Of course. Why wouldn’t I want to feel good?
If I’m conscious, which I am, I already know what feels good, and if I can feel good, then so can every other I too.
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2025 8:29 am
by Fairy
Beauty surrounds us, but usually we need to be walking in a garden to know it.
-Rumi
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2025 8:30 am
by Fairy
You are both the gardener and the garden.

Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2025 9:22 am
by Age
Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 6:08 pm
Yes, he’s right about God.
God is real. I believe.
This is no bs, I’m being serious.
I’ve changed my mind about God. God exists, and Immanuel Can is right.
Even if God is a just a belief, that belief is a just belief. You wouldn’t know belief or be able to have them if they weren’t real.
Is "immanuel can" right about God having male genitals and that 'male being/person' created absolutely EVERY single thing, and thus EVERY single different species, all at ONCE, as well?
Re: In defence of Immanuel Can
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2025 9:24 am
by Age
Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 6:32 pm
Also, I’ve for the longest time droned on an on about the teachings that is Nonduality.
Mannie said to me in some past dialogue with him his thoughts about nonduality not making any sense. He was right.
I admit wholeheartedly and with sincerity that I was wrong about Nonduality, it really doesn’t make any sense.
Only relationship with God makes sense, I know that now. I believe.
But what you just 'believe is true', 'now', might NOT be what you actually 'believe is true' at another given 'now', right?