Christianity is Idiot-Proof, Islam is Not
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 7:21 am
From an independent party view, Christianity is Idiot-Proof, Islam is Not.
Idiot-proof in the above sense, meant the religion is idiot-proof from blame by the interpretations and therefrom acts of 'idiotic' believers.
'Idiotic' is from an independent perspective not from the respective religion's perspective which may regard such believers as the most highly rated true believers.
Christianity
Christianity is idiot-proof from blame of evil and violence by idiots as it is protected by its pacifist maxims of 'love all, even enemies' give the other cheeks, etc. as asserted in "Christ's Law' within Mathew 5-7.
As such, if Christians were to kill their enemies or any humans, they would have sinned because of the maxims 'love all, even enemies' give the other cheeks, etc.. Such evil-doers cannot do it in the name of Christ or Christianity.
As such, Christianity is 'bullet proof' from being blamed as an evil religion.
The typical scenario is when Islam is blamed for acts of terror where humans are killed, the usual 'what about' is directed as the crusaders.
The fact is the crusaders [on their own volition] went against the pacifist maxim of God in going into wars which is for the greater good of the religion. Nevertheless, in the eyes of God's Law they have sinned when they killed their enemies.
Since, they have killed for the greater good, there is a good chance they will be forgiven for their sins.
In this case, there is somesort of deterrence for simply killing non-believers based on the slightest threats to the religion.
Those who kill humans for no good reasons or the slightest threats have sinned and will be punished accordingly.
Islam
Islam is NOT idiot-proof from blame of evil and violence by 'idiotic'.
Rather in Islam those who killed non-believers based on say Q5:33 upon the slightest threats, e.g. blasphemy, drawing of cartoons, critiques of the religion [as Islamophobic] are regarded as true believers and will be rewarded 10 times the ordinary.
These killer will often invoke and kill in the name of the religion, the prophet and God.
In this case, from an independent perspective, the religion is to be blame.
As such, Islam is not idiot-proof from being blame for the acts of terror and evil by some of its extremist believers* because the holy texts of the religion permit such acts.
* these are mental cases by outsiders, but according to Islam holy texts they are the most and highest rated believers.
In such a case, humanity must give serious attention to the religion itself.
The problem is the majority [believers and woke-apologists] are like ostriches to the evil elements inherent in the religion as exploited by extremists.
The point is what is supposedly from God is immutable and thus cannot be edited to be reformed.
Discuss??
Views??
Idiot-proof in the above sense, meant the religion is idiot-proof from blame by the interpretations and therefrom acts of 'idiotic' believers.
'Idiotic' is from an independent perspective not from the respective religion's perspective which may regard such believers as the most highly rated true believers.
Christianity
Christianity is idiot-proof from blame of evil and violence by idiots as it is protected by its pacifist maxims of 'love all, even enemies' give the other cheeks, etc. as asserted in "Christ's Law' within Mathew 5-7.
As such, if Christians were to kill their enemies or any humans, they would have sinned because of the maxims 'love all, even enemies' give the other cheeks, etc.. Such evil-doers cannot do it in the name of Christ or Christianity.
As such, Christianity is 'bullet proof' from being blamed as an evil religion.
The typical scenario is when Islam is blamed for acts of terror where humans are killed, the usual 'what about' is directed as the crusaders.
The fact is the crusaders [on their own volition] went against the pacifist maxim of God in going into wars which is for the greater good of the religion. Nevertheless, in the eyes of God's Law they have sinned when they killed their enemies.
Since, they have killed for the greater good, there is a good chance they will be forgiven for their sins.
In this case, there is somesort of deterrence for simply killing non-believers based on the slightest threats to the religion.
Those who kill humans for no good reasons or the slightest threats have sinned and will be punished accordingly.
Islam
Islam is NOT idiot-proof from blame of evil and violence by 'idiotic'.
Rather in Islam those who killed non-believers based on say Q5:33 upon the slightest threats, e.g. blasphemy, drawing of cartoons, critiques of the religion [as Islamophobic] are regarded as true believers and will be rewarded 10 times the ordinary.
These killer will often invoke and kill in the name of the religion, the prophet and God.
In this case, from an independent perspective, the religion is to be blame.
As such, Islam is not idiot-proof from being blame for the acts of terror and evil by some of its extremist believers* because the holy texts of the religion permit such acts.
* these are mental cases by outsiders, but according to Islam holy texts they are the most and highest rated believers.
In such a case, humanity must give serious attention to the religion itself.
The problem is the majority [believers and woke-apologists] are like ostriches to the evil elements inherent in the religion as exploited by extremists.
The point is what is supposedly from God is immutable and thus cannot be edited to be reformed.
Discuss??
Views??