Page 1 of 2

Tommy Robinson is NOT racist - provide evidence..

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:48 am
by attofishpi
Age wrote:WHY do you have a HATRED of the human being known as "keir starmer".
1. Because he is undoing EVERYTHING that our tommy's & diggers, even many of us here and now since reincarnation...fought for...our LIBERTY & our CULTURE.


Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Evil History of Keir Starmer
https://youtu.be/aTmdcynhGi0?si=YwWu-iayZ9rvdwOe

Re: Why do I "hate" Keir Starmer?

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:27 am
by accelafine
It's very sad what seems to be happening to England. Such a beautiful country with so much depth of history. Humourous, light-hearted people. All a thing of the past as far as I can tell. Yet the English seem to be the instigators of their own downfall. It's very strange.

Re: Why do I "hate" Keir Starmer?

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:22 am
by attofishpi
accelafine wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:27 am It's very sad what seems to be happening to England. Such a beautiful country with so much depth of history. Humourous, light-hearted people. All a thing of the past as far as I can tell. Yet the English seem to be the instigators of their own downfall. It's very strange.
Well you've got that right. The problem with the people of those faire aisles is that they are too fair - that they bend over backwards for people(s) of other cultures/faiths and embrace them...unfortunately many of those people from other cultures/faiths don't give a hoot about the culture and way of life within the British aisles...and want to impose their CRAP upon them.

Keir Starmer as per the OP video is one of those that will support the "human-rights" of rapists\paedophiles\murderers\terrorists over those of the victims and actual JUSTICE.

He has freed rapists\paedophiles\murderers\terrorists to make room for people that have shown dissent upon social media - OOOooo how terrible wo/mans words must be to justify a jail term where rapists\paedophiles\murderers\terrorists are set free.. :evil:

Re: Why do I "hate" Keir Starmer?

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:20 am
by godelian
Keir Starmer may be a rather uncharismatic and bureaucratic apparatchik, but at least he has survived his first seven weeks in office, unlike our good friend Liz "useless" Truss.

Keir Starmer has inherited a messy "situationship" from his predecessors, including lots of unsolved problems.

These predecessors were all elected based on the idea that they would solve the problems but they obviously and very predictably did not. It would be quite unfair to judge Keir Starmer for not solving them either.

Re: Why do I "hate" Keir Starmer?

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:35 am
by Age
attofishpi wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:48 am
Age wrote:WHY do you have a HATRED of the human being known as "keir starmer".
1. Because he is undoing EVERYTHING that our tommy's & diggers, even many of us here and now since reincarnation...fought for...our LIBERTY & our CULTURE.
What are so-called 'tommys' and 'diggers', exactly?

When was some so-called 'reincarnation', exactly?

Who is this 'our', exactly, which some so-called 'tommys' and 'diggers', supposedly, fought for their liberty and for their culture?

Also, WHY do you KEEP MISSING, COMPLETELY, what is BLATANTLY and BLINDINGLY OBVIOUS, here?

Re: Should we love Tommy Robinson? Alex Phillips

Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:13 am
by attofishpi
Is Tommy Robinson racist or just a British man that has done his best to expose CHILD RAPE GANGS (that are clearly from ethnicities that ARNT BRITISH)

..indeed, misreported by the BIAS press :?:


Alex Phillips has her say..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wedKRCM6mb0&t=310s

Re: Should we love Tommy Robinson? Alex Phillips

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:57 am
by godelian
attofishpi wrote: Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:13 am Is Tommy Robinson racist or just a British man that has done his best to expose CHILD RAPE GANGS (that are clearly from ethnicities that ARNT BRITISH)

..indeed, misreported by the BIAS press :?:


Alex Phillips has her say..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wedKRCM6mb0&t=310s
His Majesty's law enforcement and constabulary carried out a thorough investigation into Tommy Robinson's allegations, which were found to be based on mere hearsay and were at the expense of a Syrian refugee schoolboy.

The investigation concluded that Tommy Robinson's allegations were defamatory and in fact a pile of slanderous lies.

Tommy Robinson was given ample opportunity to provide evidence against the Syrian refugee schoolboy, but he couldn't find any besides his misguided misinterpretation of some vague hearsay.

The court therefore ordered Tommy Robinson to stop repeating his defamatory lies about the Syrian refugee schoolboy.

In spite of the court order demanding him not to, Tommy Robinson continued repeating his slanderous lies, as a consequence of which he was found in contempt of court.

At the request of the Crown prosecutor, Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Tommy Robinson is now in prison serving his sentence.

By the way, instead of putting up a credible defense against the Crown prosecutor, Tommy Robinson even pleaded guilty to contempt of court.

It was well within the authority and purview of the Crown to protect the Syrian refugee schoolboy from Tommy Robinson's slanderous lies.

In response, Tommy Robinson defied the authority of the Crown to enforce law and order in the British isles.

As a matter of credibility and public order, the Crown had no other option than to respond. Seriously, you defy the authority of the Crown at your own risk and peril.

Re: Should we love Tommy Robinson? Alex Phillips

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:57 am
by attofishpi
..all very well apart from the truth is that Tommy was speaking the truth, not lies.

Re: Should we love Tommy Robinson? Alex Phillips

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 4:11 am
by godelian
attofishpi wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:57 am ..all very well apart from the truth is that Tommy was speaking the truth, not lies.
Was Tommy Robinson speaking the truth about the Syrian refugee schoolboy? Seriously?

This is the inquest into the matter:

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 220721.pdf

Tommy Robinson was given ample opportunity to bring in front of the judge real evidence for his allegations against the Syrian refugee schoolboy, but he didn't. The schoolboy did not do what Tommy Robinson accused him of.

Tommy Robinson alleged that the Syrian refugee schoolboy would have harrassed young English schoolgirls. However, the alleged schoolgirl victims refused to testify against the schoolboy, testifying instead that the allegations against him were complete bullshit.

If you want to claim sexual harassment, you must be able to find a victim. Otherwise, without a victim, there is no sexual harassment. Tommy Robinson did not find one such victim in the case of the Syrian refugee schoolboy. Hence, Tommy Robinson is a liar.

Re: Should we love Tommy Robinson? Alex Phillips

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 4:33 am
by attofishpi
Yeah, it's not like the girls feel too intimidated to testify. :roll:

Re: Should we love Tommy Robinson? Alex Phillips

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 4:42 am
by Age
Why did you not just write, 'fuck starmer', instead?

Re: Should we love Tommy Robinson? Alex Phillips

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 6:45 am
by godelian
attofishpi wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 4:33 am Yeah, it's not like the girls feel too intimidated to testify. :roll:
Apparently, it all started with a conflict between two schoolboys:
Something happened between Bailey & [Jamal]. It resulted in Bailey shouting at [Jamal] angrily about him swearing at him.
They apparently had a problem with each other. Next, the English schoolboy started accusing the Syrian refugee schoolboy of irregularities implying sexual harassment of three English schoolgirls: AYQ, BWI, and OTP. Tommy Robinson ("The Defendant") started repeating these allegations. Tommy Robinson was not a eyewitness. The English schoolboy wasn't either. Tommy Robinson was obviously just repeating hearsay:
The Defendant did not give evidence. He called five witnesses at the trial in support of his truth defence: AYQ, Bailey McLaren, BWI, Charly Matthews and OTP. Each witness had been a pupil at the School at the relevant time. Some of the witnesses were still under the age of 18. I made reporting restrictions to protect the identities of several of them and have used three letter ciphers in this judgment to protect the identities of these witnesses.
The three girls actually did not want to have anything to do with the case.

Re: Tommy Robinson is NOT racist - provide evidence..

Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:06 am
by attofishpi
What evidence does anyone have that Tommy Robinson is racist?

Massive row breaks out between Tommy Robinson, Piers Morgan & Talk TV over race claim "Apologise!'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oOfFFsP4gM

Re: Tommy Robinson is NOT racist - provide evidence..

Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:25 am
by Age
attofishpi wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:06 am What evidence does anyone have that Tommy Robinson is racist?
When the word 'racist' is defined as, something like, of a person when seeing or separating human beings into conceptualized different or separated groups of so-called 'races', then the human being known here as "tommy robinson" is being a 'racist'. Just like EVERY other adult human beings does, and is, well back in the 'olden days', anyway, when this is being written.

That is the evidence I have that "tommy robinson" is racist. That is, OF COURSE, if that human being sees and/or separates human being/s into conceptualized different groups or 'races', then that human being is being a 'racist'.

attofishpi wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:06 am Massive row breaks out between Tommy Robinson, Piers Morgan & Talk TV over race claim "Apologise!'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oOfFFsP4gM

Re: Tommy Robinson is NOT racist - provide evidence..

Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:10 pm
by godelian
attofishpi wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:06 am What evidence does anyone have that Tommy Robinson is racist?
I have not found any evidence that Tommy Robinson would be a racist. He seems to be mostly opposed to Islam. Furthermore, unlike what some people seem to believe, he has not been jailed for racism, islamophobia, anti-immigrant rhetoric, or any of his political ideas. He is now in prison for refusing to stop repeating defamatory and slanderous lies about a Syrian refugee schoolboy. A summary of what it is about:
https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/ ... y-robinson

In October 2018, a video was posted on social media showing schoolchildren harass and violently assault Jamal Hijazi, a 15 year old Syrian schoolboy in Huddersfield, England. As the video went viral, Robinson put out two videos of his own claiming that Hijazi was “not innocent” and accused him of attacking “young English girls in his school.” Hijazi’s lawyer stated that Robinson’s videos on social media “turned Jamal into the aggressor, and the bully into a righteous white knight,” and that Robinson “tried to use Jamal’s case as a platform for one of his anti-Muslim rants.” In 2021, Hijazi sued Robinson for libel, seeking up to £190,000 in damages. During the trial, Robinson declared himself bankrupt. In closing statements of the trial, Hijazi’s lawyer noted that “We do rely on the defendant’s [Tommy Robinson] agenda, which we say is an anti-Muslim one, which is why he waded into this … Jamal was the victim of that.” Robinson defended himself at the trial and maintained that his comments were substantially true. In July 2021, Robinson lost the case and the judge ordered him to pay £100,000 in libel damages to Hijazi.

In July 2024, Robinson spoke at a demonstration he organized where he screened his documentary, against court orders. The documentary repeated false accusations he made about a Syrian refugee in 2021 that led to him losing a court case. A few days later, Robinson fled abroad, evading court hearings over showing the banned documentary.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704eedkqkvo

Tommy Robinson jailed for contempt of court
28 October 2024

Far-right activist Tommy Robinson has been jailed for 18 months after admitting contempt of court by repeating false claims against a Syrian refugee.

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, admitted 10 breaches of a High Court order made in 2021, during a hearing at Woolwich Crown Court. Lawyers for the solicitor general accused the 41-year-old of "undermining" the rule of law.

Passing sentence, Judge Mr Justice Johnson said the breaches of the injunction, which prevented Yaxley-Lennon from repeating the allegations, were not “accidental, negligent or merely reckless” and the custodial threshold was "amply crossed”. Eventually, this July, the anti-Islam activist showed the film to thousands of his supporters in London's Trafalgar Square, saying he would not be silenced. The following day he left the country.

Aidan Eardley KC, for Solicitor General Sarah Sackman, told the court that Yaxley-Lennon had intended to repeat the false allegations, despite the injunction, and then take “evasive” measures.

“This is a high culpability case because of the high number of breaches,” said Mr Eardley. Jailing Yaxley-Lennon for 18 months, Mr Justice Johnson said: “In a democratic society underpinned by the rule of law, court orders must be obeyed. “Nobody is above the law. Nobody can pick or choose which laws or which injunctions they obey, or which they do not. “They are not entitled to set themselves up as the judge in their own court. Otherwise the administration of justice and rule of law would break down.”
Seriously, Tommy Robinson has to stop talking shit about the Syrian refugee schoolboy. He had been told to stop doing that umpteen times in the past already. He just kept doing it. That is infuriating. What right does Tommy Robinson think he has to keep repeating slanderous shit talk about the schoolboy?