Philosophy Now Forum

Does anyone actually base their vote on the 'result' of an election debate? Does anyone even watch election debates in full? Why would being a good debater make someone a good person, someone worth voting for? For me it would be the opposite. I would be much more inclined to vote for someone who was a terrible debater

The whole spectacle was clearly biased towards the cackling banshee Harris (she must have been advised to remain cackle-free for the duration of the debate). Even 'I' could see that many of her obvious 'untruths' went unchallenged, while Trump wasn't allowed to get away with even the tiniest hint of the same.

Have pity Americans. That woman's voice alone induces a feeling of despair and loss of the will to live--much like the dementors of Harry Potter fame.

The only benefit she had over Biden was that she could remember the list of things that she was told to remember prior - including the points to slag Trump off about.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:49 am Does anyone actually base their vote on the 'result' of an election debate? Does anyone even watch election debates in full? Why would being a good debater make someone a good person, someone worth voting for? For me it would be the opposite. I would be much more inclined to vote for someone who was a terrible debater

So, 'this one', supposedly and allegedly, is far less inclined to vote upon the actual policies are more so upon if one human beings is a so-called "terrible debater" or not.

The whole spectacle was clearly biased towards the cackling banshee Harris (she must have been advised to remain cackle-free for the duration of the debate). Even 'I' could see that many of her obvious 'untruths' went unchallenged, while Trump wasn't allowed to get away with even the tiniest hint of the same. [/quote]

I wonder if this one would express, in detail, what the, supposed and alleged, 'obvious untruths', were, exactly?

And, is 'this one' really correct in claiming that not a single untruth by the other one was question nor challenged?

By the way now 'we' know the answer to 'this one's' question regarding if any one even watches election debates, in full. As 'this one' just said and claimed that 'it does'.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:49 am Have pity Americans. That woman's voice alone induces a feeling of despair and loss of the will to live--much like the dementors of Harry Potter fame.

Doe this mean that 'this one' is instructing you others to make your judgement/s, and to cast your vote/s, on the voices of others?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 1:10 am The only benefit she had over Biden was that she could remember the list of things that she was told to remember prior - including the points to slag Trump off about.

These people, back then, really did 'look at', 'view', and 'see' things from a Truly closed or narrowed perspective and field of view. As can be seen, very clearly here, once more.

Awful cackling banchee aside, did anyone else notice how good Trump looked? He's aged negatively since he was shot and the new 'do is very fetching. Love the colour

Can't say I did. Maybe i need someone to blow one of my ears off then.

Compared to

..must be a female heterosexual thing - he's still ugly in all images to me.

(although you do hate men enough to have swung teams)

reconstructive surgery on his ear is impressive

-Imp