Philosophy Now Forum

As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).
This isn't religion. It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely. Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world. Gosh, I wonder if there's a connection. Why would a regime that's steeped in 'secret' hypocritical homosexuality, paedophilia and male supremacy want to hide women and make their lives as miserable as possible?

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).

In every country there is a so-called "leader", which just about all of them call "themselves" the "best leader", (or in another term a or the "supreme leader").

The country of "afghanistan" is no different in this.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm This isn't religion.

The word 'religion', itself, just refers the 'belief in' some thing, a particular system of faith, worship, and/or belief, or a pursuit with great devotion.

So, any society ordering or enforcing the members of that society to where any particular forms of clothing is 'not religion'.

This is just blatantly obvious.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely.

Now, considering the fact that all of you human beings are 'slaves' to 'the societies' in which you have found "yourselves" living within, then who is 'to blame' for how all of you are living in the days when this is being written.

I have observed a lot of you adult human beings, in so-called "western societies" denigrating or ridiculing the enforcement of women in some countries having to wear 'bodily face coverings' without ever having once ever stopped to consider that all of you are under the exact same 'enforcement' "yourselves" regarding 'bodily coverings'.

Once again, just maybe 'the world' would be a lot better place 'NOW' if you all just stopped 'looking at' others, and what they do, and started 'looking at' and 'focusing on' what 'you', "yourselves", do instead, and only.

All of you adult human beings are 'under' some sort of 'ruling', in the 'exact same way' that those human beings in the pic are.

Now, let 'us' 'see' who is honest and brave enough to admit this here.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world.

Well this is, obviously, a very 'racist' and very individual only perspective of things. But please keep telling 'us' what you, personally, like, and do not like.

Are you under some sort of illusion that your own, personal, likes, or dislikes, have some actual bearing on what is actually True and Right, in Life?

Truth, after all, is what is, essentially, far, far more important here.

Are not all women 'beautiful'?

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm Gosh, I wonder if there's a connection.

Okay.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm Why would a regime that's steeped in 'secret' hypocritical homosexuality, paedophilia and male supremacy want to hide women and make their lives as miserable as possible?

How do you, supposedly, know the 'secret/s' of those human beings, which 'you' do not have a direct connection with?

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).
This isn't religion. It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely. Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world. Gosh, I wonder if there's a connection. Why would a regime that's steeped in 'secret' hypocritical homosexuality, paedophilia and male supremacy want to hide women and make their lives as miserable as possible?

So what's the NZ regime done that has you so angry all the time?

Clearly that image is a study group learning to rob banks.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:08 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).
This isn't religion. It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely. Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world. Gosh, I wonder if there's a connection. Why would a regime that's steeped in 'secret' hypocritical homosexuality, paedophilia and male supremacy want to hide women and make their lives as miserable as possible?

So what's the NZ regime done that has you so angry all the time?

Clearly that image is a study group learning to rob banks.

What does that even mean? Drunk again?

Victor's trip only led to more anger and resentment, no matter how bad things are they can still get worse.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).
This isn't religion. It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely. Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world.

Yes, they are among the most beautiful women in the world, and is probably why the Taliban leader sees these women as being sacred beings that need to be protected by men from men. It's ironic. The covering-up is seen as a respectful act of devoted obeyance to their religious beliefs.
This all body covering-up, including the face, is necessary to minimise any potential male distraction and take away the temptation to lust after their alluring beauty.

This is religion, it's really sick, it's a perfect reflection of the human condition, as only humans display this kind of oppressive authoritarian behaviour on their own species.

learning how to shoot automatic weapons while wearing bikinis...

-Imp

Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 1:26 pm learning how to shoot automatic weapons while wearing bikinis...

-Imp

when you got a gun......ain't nobody gonna make you wear a hijab

Me-Be wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:37 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).
This isn't religion. It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely. Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world.

Yes, they are among the most beautiful women in the world, and is probably why the Taliban leader sees these women as being sacred beings that need to be protected by men from men. It's ironic. The covering-up is seen as a respectful act of devoted obeyance to their religious beliefs.
This all body covering-up, including the face, is necessary to minimise any potential male distraction and take away the temptation to lust after their alluring beauty.

This is religion, it's really sick, it's a perfect reflection of the human condition, as only humans display this kind of oppressive authoritarian behaviour on their own species.

What a load of crap. Women are also not 'allowed' to make a sound in public. Apparently even their voices/laughs cause muslim men to get raging, uncontrollable erections and incite them to rape (if you believe that you will believe anything). It has nothing to do with women being 'sacred', and it certainly has nothing to do with 'protecting' them. If women don't comply then they are likely to be stoned or hanged. So much for being 'protected'. Where are the shouts of protest from men in muslim countries about the treatment of women? You can't tell me that all Afghan men are insane radicals. Afghanistan before the Taliban was nothing like it is now.
Men have NEVER at ANY time been 'protectors' of women. I don't understand why people continue to believe that utter lie-- especially women. You hear it all the time in the 'trans' topic as well. ''But MEN won't ALLOW their daughters to be ogled by men in changing rooms, toilets etc. They won't ALLOW men to injure/beat up their wives and daughters in sports'. They won't ALLOW their children to be brainwashed into believing they have the 'wrong body' ''. Yeah, sure they won't. That's why you see men protesting about it all the time and standing up for their 'wives and daughters' The reality is that you NEVER see men standing up for women. It just doesn't happen.

You only have to look at the pathetic creatures on this site; the likes of 'Harbal', sculptah, iwannaplato and co, standing up for MEN who get off on going out in public in womanface--predators who are now crawling out from under their rocks, emboldened by the backing of 'self ID' laws that allow them to gain access to everything that is exclusively for females. We have the bizarre spectacle of post middle-aged men playing sports alongside teenage girls (and younger) and leering at them in the showers. If they are too gutless and misogynistic to even stand up for women on an anoynymous internet forum then do you really think they are any use to women whatsoever in the real world? The cowardly little germs are only interested in themselves.

You know who stood up for women? Promoted their education? Gave them more freedom than any other muslim country? Hated radical islam?

Saddam Hussein. That's who. And we all know what became of him and what the US 'gifted' to the world in the form of ISIS after his murder and the despicable invasion of his country among others, sealing the fate of millions of women in the muslim world.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 9:44 pm You know who stood up for women? Promoted their education? Gave them more freedom than any other muslim country? Hated radical islam?

Saddam Hussein. That's who. And we all know what became of him and what the US 'gifted' to the world in the form of ISIS after his murder and the despicable invasion of his country among others, sealing the fate of millions of women in the muslim world.

You're not wrong. He was the lesser of two evils.

Me-Be wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:37 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).
This isn't religion. It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely. Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world.

Yes, they are among the most beautiful women in the world, and is probably why the Taliban leader sees these women as being sacred beings that need to be protected by men from men. It's ironic. The covering-up is seen as a respectful act of devoted obeyance to their religious beliefs.

And, what is the 'covering-up' done by just about every one of you other adult human being, in just about every other country and culture, 'seen' as, exactly?

Is 'your covering-up' seen as a respectful act of devoted obedience to your religious beliefs? Or, do 'you cover-up', and are being 'forcefully covered-up', for some other reason?

Me-Be wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:37 am This all body covering-up, including the face, is necessary to minimise any potential male distraction and take away the temptation to lust after their alluring beauty.

A bit like how you adult human beings have 'forced' children to minimize potential distractions, by taking away particular temptations, so that children will grow up to be 'slaves', to the 'money making trade', as well.

Me-Be wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:37 am This is religion, it's really sick, it's a perfect reflection of the human condition, as only humans display this kind of oppressive authoritarian behaviour on their own species.

And, as just about absolutely every one of you adult human beings reflect the exact same 'human' so-called 'condition'.

But, sadly, every one of you thinks or believes that your very own Wrong doing is 'justified', and thus is okay or all right.

This, by the way, is also another thing that if absolutely any one of you here would like to 'take me up' or challenge me on, then please do.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 3:06 pm

Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 1:26 pm learning how to shoot automatic weapons while wearing bikinis...

-Imp

when you got a gun...A44C6D2C-2273-40DE-8FCD-4E0928852E14.jpeg...ain't nobody gonna make you wear a hijab

LOL This coming from 'the slave' who is 'forced' to 'cover up', itself.

But, like many of 'the ilk' of 'this one', it does not yet know that it is a 'slave', and although watching it believe that it is actually 'free' is funny the funniest part here is it actually believes that it is free because it owns a killing weapon.

It is said that the smallness of the penis is relative to how much monetary wealth one tries to show off that they have. Just like the weakness of one can be aligned with how much weapons they want, and need, to so-call 'defend' "them self".

'This one' claims that if one has got a gun, then absolutely no one is gonna make them 'cover-up'. Yet, "henry quirk" is living proof that even if, and when, it, "itself", owns a gun, then it is, still, a 'slave' and forced to 'cover-up'.

Now, I have been alluding to this fact, and pointing out that "henry quirk" is an absolute 'slave', to the "state", for quite a while, now, in this forum. But, it has blindly gone about its business not recognizing this Fact, let alone would it ever accept and agree to this irrefutable claim, and Fact, right "henry quirk".

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm

Me-Be wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:37 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:52 pm As of now this is what women in Afghanistan have to wear, as decreed by the Taliban leader (apparently he calls himself 'supreme'--what a surprise).
This isn't religion. It's what happens when men get to express their extreme hatred for women freely. Afghan women are among the most beautiful in the world.

Yes, they are among the most beautiful women in the world, and is probably why the Taliban leader sees these women as being sacred beings that need to be protected by men from men. It's ironic. The covering-up is seen as a respectful act of devoted obeyance to their religious beliefs.
This all body covering-up, including the face, is necessary to minimise any potential male distraction and take away the temptation to lust after their alluring beauty.

This is religion, it's really sick, it's a perfect reflection of the human condition, as only humans display this kind of oppressive authoritarian behaviour on their own species.

What a load of crap. Women are also not 'allowed' to make a sound in public. Apparently even their voices/laughs cause muslim men to get raging, uncontrollable erections and incite them to rape (if you believe that you will believe anything). It has nothing to do with women being 'sacred', and it certainly has nothing to do with 'protecting' them. If women don't comply then they are likely to be stoned or hanged. So much for being 'protected'.

I thought "me-be" was, more or less, agreeing 'with you'. So, I am not sure why you would say what it said was a 'load of crap'.

But, then again, I could be Wrong and "me-be" was saying, and meaning, what you had interpreted here "accelafine".

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm Where are the shouts of protest from men in muslim countries about the treatment of women?

And, where are the shouts of protest from "men", in any country, about the treatment of "women", from "themselves"?

Also, where are the shouts of protest from adults, again in any country, about the treatment of children, from adults?

It is like you are asking here, Why do you people not shout out about the 'mistreatment' that you are doing to not just one another but also to the actual one home that you all live on/in, and share.

Obviously you people are not going to 'shout about' the mistreatment you are, actually, doing to one another. The mistreatment all of you adult human beings are doing is 'kept quite and secret within. So, that is 'exactly where' the 'shouts of protests' are "accelafine".

Where are the shouts of protests from adults about the mistreatment you do to and upon others?

Again, they are being 'hidden within' because 'those adults' do the exact same Wrongs that you "yourself" do "accelafine".

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm You can't tell me that all Afghan men are insane radicals.

Okay.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm Afghanistan before the Taliban was nothing like it is now.

new zealand before was also nothing like it is 'now', as well. But, so what?

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm Men have NEVER at ANY time been 'protectors' of women.

So, well to "accelafine" anyway, throughout the whole of human history, "men" have never ever protected a "women" from some thing, and, again, just to make it absolutely at ANY time whatsoever.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm I don't understand why people continue to believe that utter lie-- especially women. You hear it all the time in the 'trans' topic as well. ''But MEN won't ALLOW their daughters to be ogled by men in changing rooms, toilets etc. They won't ALLOW men to injure/beat up their wives and daughters in sports'. They won't ALLOW their children to be brainwashed into believing they have the 'wrong body' ''. Yeah, sure they won't. That's why you see men protesting about it all the time and standing up for their 'wives and daughters' The reality is that you NEVER see men standing up for women. It just doesn't happen.

But, what do "women", supposedly, 'need' "men" to so-call 'stand up for them', for exactly?

If "men" have NEVER, at absolutely ANY time, been 'protectors' of "women", then what could "men" actually 'stand up' for, and 'protect' "women" against, exactly?

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm You only have to look at the pathetic creatures on this site; the likes of 'Harbal', sculptah, iwannaplato and co, standing up for MEN who get off on going out in public in womanface--predators who are now crawling out from under their rocks, emboldened by the backing of 'self ID' laws that allow them to gain access to everything that is exclusively for females.

And, what is, supposedly, 'exclusively' for "females" of the human being species, exactly, and only?

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm We have the bizarre spectacle of post middle-aged men playing sports alongside teenage girls (and younger) and leering at them in the showers.

And, how, exactly, do you know what the so-called 'post middle-aged men' are doing in 'the showers', exactly?

One could be mistaken that for 'you' to 'know' what that very specific type of human being does, exactly, in 'the showers', could only be ascertained and known, for sure, if you were one "yourself".

Unless, of course, you have been 'there', in 'the shower', leering at 'them' and watching and observing what they are doing.

But, then again, to ascertain if 'they' were actually 'leering' or just 'looking' you would have to inform the readers here of what the actual difference is, exactly.

And then you would have to explain how you 'know' if one is actually 'leering', or 'just looking', when the word 'leering' implies a sense of 'knowing' the internal thoughts with a human body. Which, again, brings 'us' back to the fact that without one directly admitting to you that they were so-called 'leering', then the only other way if that type of very specific human being was 'leering', or not, was if 'you' were one, "yourself", and that 'leering', in 'the showers', 'at others' is what you, "yourself", do.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm If they are too gutless and misogynistic to even stand up for women

But how could 'any of them' so-call 'stand up' for "women" when you have made it absolutely clear that you believe, absolutely, that "men" have NEVER ever, at ANY time, been 'protectors' of "women". The words 'stand up' obviously implies some form of 'protection'.

Or, when you say 'stand up', do you mean something else other than 'protecting'?

If yes, then what, exactly, do you mean by "men" 'standing up' 'for' "women"?

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm on an anoynymous internet forum then do you really think they are any use to women whatsoever in the real world?

'The way' that some, presumably, "men", in this forum, talk about and refer to "women", then there is no wonder why 'the world' is in the completely unequal, twisted, distorted, disjointed mess that it is in, in the days when this is being written.

But, and obviously, 'the way' that you talk about and refer to "men", in this forum, is never going to actually help sort 'the mess' out here, either.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 6:54 pm The cowardly little germs are only interested in themselves.

But 'you', a "women" are not only interested in "yourself", nor only interested in "women's rights" here, right "accelafine"?

Harassment alert. There is a whole row of hidden comments from the batshit insane one known as 'Age'. I have been violated. My very existence is under threat. I am being 'genocided'.