Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
If we are to truly consider ourselves moral and civilized, then we must get rid of the animal slaughterhouse industry.
Among other things.
But, you adult human beings here do not truly consider "yourselves" to be 'moral' and 'civilized', do you?
If you do, then I have a lot more work to do here than I first realized.
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
It has no place in a modern civilization
What, exactly, do you refer to as 'modern civilization'?
After all you just talked about getting rid of the 'animal slaughter industry', which clearly exists, in the days when this is being written. So, obviously, in the days when this is being written, this is not a 'modern civilization', right?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
that prides itself on enlightenment and ethical principles.
Most of you adult human beings, in the days when this is being written, cannot even discuss the word 'ethics', nor have a discussion about 'ethical principles', without getting into a slanderous match between "yourselves", let alone actually getting to any 'enlightenment' at all.
So, again, you are obviously not talking about any civilization/society 'in the days when this is being written', right?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
We are not cavemen anymore;
But "cavemen" did not harvest, farm, 'cage', nor abuse animals for selfish and greedy monetary gains. Unlike you adult human beings do, in the days when this is being written.
So, the non human animal population would probably 'wish', if they could, that you human beings would go back to be "cavemen" like. This would be more 'civil', and ironically more humane, from the non human animal perspective.
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
we don't need to hunt anymore.
But, what are 'we' going to hang on our walls in our homes if 'we' stopped 'hunting' animals anymore?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
We live in a modern civilization with plenty of resources.
Again, from the very quickest of observations, when you say, 'modern civilization' you are not referring to 'the way' that you human beings use to live, back in those 'olden days', when this was being written, correct?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
Being vegan it totally practical.
But, how are adult human beings going to, what is called, 'make money', if and when they are not farming, caging, nor harvesting animals?
Do not forget that the number one thing for all adult human beings, in the days when this is being written, is to obtain 'more money'. And, using and abusing animals is a great source of income, and monetary wealth. So, why would any of you adult human beings want to stop this?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
And there are also plenty of vegan sources of protein. You won't be malnourished. The animal slaughterhouse industry is ugly and cruel.
Why only the 'animal slaughterhouse industry' is ugly and cruel?
What about the caging and showing off of animals, is that not ugly and cruel to you as well?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
We must acquire a new morality that truly includes the well being of animals.
But, are you living in a 'modern civilization' or not?
Because if you are living in a 'modern civilization', then why would anyone want to change 'that'?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
Killing animals and eating their meat is barbaric and cruel.
But not when you adult human beings 'justify' the doing of this is 'necessary' and done, again ironically, 'humanely'.
Also, what about for those who 'need' to eat meat to live and survive?
Is it also barbaric and cruel for them, as well?
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
Part of the human telos is to evolve and transcend.
Well human beings, along with absolutely everything else, have absolutely no choice at all but 'to evolve'
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
We must respect animals in order to promote an ever advancing civilization.
Just like it is said that one cannot love another, properly and Correctly, until 'that one' loves "itself", so to one cannot respect animals, until they respect "them" 'self', 'an animal'.
Eudaimonia23 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:22 pm
Choose the benevolent and compassionate path and be vegan.
What about if 'you' had to choose between what you call 'the benevolent and compassionate path' or 'being dead', then would 'you' 'die' "vegan", or stay alive, 'eating meat'?
In regards, or in relation, to 'what', exactly?