Moral: VA; Abstraction, Concept & Identity
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2024 3:31 am
Here is a realistic presentation of Abstraction, Concept & Identity in contrast to PH's.
Whatever is real is conditioned upon a human-based framework and system of emergence, realization of reality [FSER], then perceived, known and described [FSC].
Here is a realistic presentation of of the Abstraction, Concept & Identity in its proper order & perspective within a timeline to the present;
# [FSERC] precedes the below:
1. Big Bang
2. The particle 'soup'
2i Clustering of particles - atoms, molecules
3. Abiogenesis - evolution to the present
4. Advent of FSER
5. Emergence of reality
6. Realization of reality
7. Abstraction
8. Language
9. Conceptualization
10. Logic
11. Idealization
PH's omission is all the above are contingent upon a FSER [1-6] or FSERC [1-11] and 1-11 spiral on a meta-FSERC, i.e. the FSERC of FSERC.
The following are contingent within a FSERC:
The term 'identity' [A=A] is only valid with the logic-FSERC and specifically classical logic only. Identity [A=A] has not validity outside the classical-logic-FSERC.
Pure identity is impossible in that we have to identify every particle in its specific time and space.
My point:
Whatever is real is conditioned upon a human-based framework and system of emergence, realization of reality [FSER], then perceived, known and described [FSC], so are the terms, abstraction, concepts and identity.
Whatever is real is conditioned upon a human-based framework and system of emergence, realization of reality [FSER], then perceived, known and described [FSC].
Here is a realistic presentation of of the Abstraction, Concept & Identity in its proper order & perspective within a timeline to the present;
# [FSERC] precedes the below:
1. Big Bang
2. The particle 'soup'
2i Clustering of particles - atoms, molecules
3. Abiogenesis - evolution to the present
4. Advent of FSER
5. Emergence of reality
6. Realization of reality
7. Abstraction
8. Language
9. Conceptualization
10. Logic
11. Idealization
PH's omission is all the above are contingent upon a FSER [1-6] or FSERC [1-11] and 1-11 spiral on a meta-FSERC, i.e. the FSERC of FSERC.
The following are contingent within a FSERC:
- 1. What our first one-celled living thing ancestor interact with reality was merely a soup of particles. This is the advent of the first crude framework and system of emergence and realization of reality [FSER].
2. Patterns [nominalism] from the soup of particles are recognized.
3. To simplify, abstractions emerged to categorize [intuitive and sensible] these individual clusters of pattern into categories comprising those of similar characteristics.
4. Using the power of the intellect, the above abstractions [intuited and sensed] are conceptualized as concepts. As such, whatever is a concept must have an empirical based. They can be concrete or 'abstract' concepts [empirical only].
5. The application of logic is based on abstractions and concepts at this stage.
6. As humans evolved with greater intellect, thinking and speculative power, humans are able to generate thoughts that has no empirical basis, i.e. beyond empirical possibility, e.g. the noumena aka thing-in-itself.
Kant called these 'ideas' [intellectualized non-empirical] which has no empirical possibility from concepts which are intellectualized-empirical.
The term 'identity' [A=A] is only valid with the logic-FSERC and specifically classical logic only. Identity [A=A] has not validity outside the classical-logic-FSERC.
Pure identity is impossible in that we have to identify every particle in its specific time and space.
My point:
Whatever is real is conditioned upon a human-based framework and system of emergence, realization of reality [FSER], then perceived, known and described [FSC], so are the terms, abstraction, concepts and identity.