No Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory??
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 4:31 am
What have we got to lose if we were to deny the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory?
To rely on the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory [which are speculative and theoretical] is the Bottom-up approach, i.e. one start with a basic belief at the bottom to explain why things and reality as it is at the present.
One contribution with Big Bang and Evolution [abiogenesis] are as basis to counter against the existence of God argument. But there are other arguments to argue against God's existence.
One problem is the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory are still subject to the problem of infinite regression, i.e. what happened before them?
I believe there is no loss nor handicap to humanity if we were to deny or ignore the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory for certain arguments.
This is where I argue for the Emergence and Realization of Reality [within a FSERC] from the TOP-DOWN approach.
Instead of starting from the bottom to explain the present, we strive to understand reality from what is justified and existing at present to as far down as our empirical evidences and critical thinking can support it without any concern for any ultimate grounds.
With Emergence, what is critical is we can rely on FSERC scientific truths to make useful predictions that can be justified with testing and repeatability thus enable confidence in their ability to predict and therefrom make positive contributions [in all aspects] to humanity in terms of scientific based technology.
What is Emergence & a priori Realization of Reality
viewtopic.php?t=40721
There might be some loss if we deny the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory [Bottom-Up] (which is reasonable up to a point), but the tradeoff for Emergence [Top-Down] is a lose-win [net-win] situation.
Discuss??
Views??
To rely on the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory [which are speculative and theoretical] is the Bottom-up approach, i.e. one start with a basic belief at the bottom to explain why things and reality as it is at the present.
One contribution with Big Bang and Evolution [abiogenesis] are as basis to counter against the existence of God argument. But there are other arguments to argue against God's existence.
One problem is the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory are still subject to the problem of infinite regression, i.e. what happened before them?
I believe there is no loss nor handicap to humanity if we were to deny or ignore the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory for certain arguments.
This is where I argue for the Emergence and Realization of Reality [within a FSERC] from the TOP-DOWN approach.
Instead of starting from the bottom to explain the present, we strive to understand reality from what is justified and existing at present to as far down as our empirical evidences and critical thinking can support it without any concern for any ultimate grounds.
With Emergence, what is critical is we can rely on FSERC scientific truths to make useful predictions that can be justified with testing and repeatability thus enable confidence in their ability to predict and therefrom make positive contributions [in all aspects] to humanity in terms of scientific based technology.
What is Emergence & a priori Realization of Reality
viewtopic.php?t=40721
There might be some loss if we deny the Big Bang & Evolutionary Theory [Bottom-Up] (which is reasonable up to a point), but the tradeoff for Emergence [Top-Down] is a lose-win [net-win] situation.
Discuss??
Views??