Page 1 of 1

13 March 2024. Sleeping black hole is way more massive than it should be

Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:02 pm
by socrattus
13 March 2024. Sleeping black hole is way more massive than it should be
The James Webb Space Telescope has found an unusual galaxy in the early universe
with a black hole almost half the mass of the galaxy itself, raising questions about how it formed
/By Jonathan O’Callaghan/
------
A black hole in the early universe has almost half the mass of its host galaxy
despite no longer sucking in matter, raising questions about how black holes grow.
--------
https://www.newscientist.com/article/24 ... ing-black-

Re: 13 March 2024. Sleeping black hole is way more massive than it should be

Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 3:22 pm
by Impenitent
sleeping black hole?

if it were awake, would it move about the universe and gobble up stars like a dark pac man?

-Imp

Re: 13 March 2024. Sleeping black hole is way more massive than it should be

Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:32 pm
by socrattus
Impenitent wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 3:22 pm sleeping black hole?

if it were awake, would it move about the universe and gobble up stars like a dark pac man?

-Imp
sleeping black hole . . .
awakening black hole . . .
When One Black Hole Eats Another... Look Out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=366_xfP_PtI
#
Space Cannibal: Ginormous Black Hole Caught Eating Another
News
/By Charles Q. Choi published August 31, 2011/
https://www.space.com/12790-monster-bla ... sions.html

Re: 13 March 2024. Sleeping black hole is way more massive than it should be

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2024 12:50 am
by promethean75
The collision and merger of two black holes can produce 36 septillion yottawatts of power in fractions of a second.

Imagine having a guitar amp that could produce that many watts bro. I'd be like

Re: 13 March 2024. Sleeping black hole is way more massive than it should be

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 2:51 pm
by socrattus
billssw wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:44 am According to these concepts , blackhole is not measure by size , so it is no matter " TINY or MASSIVE" ,
In short , IT IS JUST " INFINITIVE MASSIVE " , in the same time " INFINITIVE TINY"
. . . like the "singularity" of the Big Bang?