history and philosophy
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:41 pm
this is not a history of philosophy, or a philosophy of history,
but philosophy in time/history idea....
one of the problems with philosophy is that it is always,
ALWAYS behind the times.... philosophy has yet to engage with
our modern times in any sort of meaningful way....for example,
our technological world, philosophy has yet to work out any sort
of philosophy that takes into account technology...
and we haven't any sort of philosophy that has taken into account
any of the scientific ideas of the last 140 years.... for example,
we have no philosophy of Einsteins ideas... what does it mean to
human beings in regard to Einstein ideas within a philosophical
context...or Quantum mechanics... how does that idea impact
us as human beings? who knows, no one has approached that idea
philosophically.....as a philosophical idea, what does the most
important scientific idea mean, E = mc2 to us, philosophically?
what does it mean to us philosophically that matter and energy are
the same thing? and what about space/time? How does that
impact us philosophically? Philosophy operates about a
120 years behind the times.... we act as if Nietzsche were the last
important philosophical idea around.... (one might say Heidegger or
Sartre, but they still engaged in philosophy without thought to the
scientific ideas being created around them)
this has been called a technological world, and yet, we still
haven't engaged with technology in any sort of meaningful way
within a philosophical context...
or we haven't engaged in philosophy in regards to historical events
of the 20th century.... for example, the Holocaust... what does
the Holocaust mean to us philosophically? or perhaps we could
engage in the two world wars and what that tells us about human beings?
or think about this.... the fact is that the so-called modern ideologies
were all thought of before Nietzsche... Communism, capitalism, socialism,
democracy... do those isms have any value in our modern technological world?
the isms certainly take advantage of the new technologies, but have
they adapted to the new technology? does the goal of a ''workers paradise''
make any sense in our new world of cars, airplanes, cell phones,
and space flight? we live in a totally different environment than
Marx did, does it make sense to still follow Marx, given the new
environment of technology?
does the goal of the declaration of Independence, actually now make
any sense? to quote the declaration....
''We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,
that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
in this ''modern age" does the pursuit of ''life, liberty and the pursuit
of happiness, make sense anymore? it is the pursuit of happiness
that has, in large part, created much of the problems of the world
today....as we have defined the pursuit of happiness, as being
the pursuit of the trinkets of existence... in the pursuit
of wealth or power, fame and titles and of material possessions...
it is the pursuit of these things that has contributed to dangerous
things as global warming and overpopulation and income inequality...
given our new environment today, we cannot allow ourselves to be
following the same things that has brought us into many of our
major problems of today.... we cannot depend on capitalism to
solve the problems of capitalism... or said another way...
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again,
and expecting a different result"
so, what exactly am I calling for?
An entire reevaluation of every ism, principle and reason
that we use today to justify our beliefs and actions...
to think about the last century actions and beliefs and
turn that into some sort of philosophy.... to take the
scientific and historical actions of the last 200 years
and give some real thought, otherwise known as philosophy,
and make sense of what has happened into a philosophy....
we cannot afford philosophy to be 100 years behind the facts on
the ground...for once in its history, philosophy must try and not only
catch up, but to be ahead of what is happening to us and by us....
philosophy must not only engage in what was, but also what is,
and what will be, philosophically...that is the new task of
philosophy... to actually stay in touch with what is currently
happening in the world and anticipate it.....
and engage in the world, historically, scientifically, technologically,
politically and philosophically, with what is and what could be...
to remain current with world's events as they happen...
that is going to be a tough task, but given where we are today,
we have no choice.... remain current or die as a subject matter..
the very future of philosophy hangs in the balance...
either we help in finding solutions or we pack our bags
and go home...and philosophy dies the
death it deserves....if philosophy is unable to provide answers,
what is the point of philosophy?
Kropotkin
but philosophy in time/history idea....
one of the problems with philosophy is that it is always,
ALWAYS behind the times.... philosophy has yet to engage with
our modern times in any sort of meaningful way....for example,
our technological world, philosophy has yet to work out any sort
of philosophy that takes into account technology...
and we haven't any sort of philosophy that has taken into account
any of the scientific ideas of the last 140 years.... for example,
we have no philosophy of Einsteins ideas... what does it mean to
human beings in regard to Einstein ideas within a philosophical
context...or Quantum mechanics... how does that idea impact
us as human beings? who knows, no one has approached that idea
philosophically.....as a philosophical idea, what does the most
important scientific idea mean, E = mc2 to us, philosophically?
what does it mean to us philosophically that matter and energy are
the same thing? and what about space/time? How does that
impact us philosophically? Philosophy operates about a
120 years behind the times.... we act as if Nietzsche were the last
important philosophical idea around.... (one might say Heidegger or
Sartre, but they still engaged in philosophy without thought to the
scientific ideas being created around them)
this has been called a technological world, and yet, we still
haven't engaged with technology in any sort of meaningful way
within a philosophical context...
or we haven't engaged in philosophy in regards to historical events
of the 20th century.... for example, the Holocaust... what does
the Holocaust mean to us philosophically? or perhaps we could
engage in the two world wars and what that tells us about human beings?
or think about this.... the fact is that the so-called modern ideologies
were all thought of before Nietzsche... Communism, capitalism, socialism,
democracy... do those isms have any value in our modern technological world?
the isms certainly take advantage of the new technologies, but have
they adapted to the new technology? does the goal of a ''workers paradise''
make any sense in our new world of cars, airplanes, cell phones,
and space flight? we live in a totally different environment than
Marx did, does it make sense to still follow Marx, given the new
environment of technology?
does the goal of the declaration of Independence, actually now make
any sense? to quote the declaration....
''We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,
that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
in this ''modern age" does the pursuit of ''life, liberty and the pursuit
of happiness, make sense anymore? it is the pursuit of happiness
that has, in large part, created much of the problems of the world
today....as we have defined the pursuit of happiness, as being
the pursuit of the trinkets of existence... in the pursuit
of wealth or power, fame and titles and of material possessions...
it is the pursuit of these things that has contributed to dangerous
things as global warming and overpopulation and income inequality...
given our new environment today, we cannot allow ourselves to be
following the same things that has brought us into many of our
major problems of today.... we cannot depend on capitalism to
solve the problems of capitalism... or said another way...
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again,
and expecting a different result"
so, what exactly am I calling for?
An entire reevaluation of every ism, principle and reason
that we use today to justify our beliefs and actions...
to think about the last century actions and beliefs and
turn that into some sort of philosophy.... to take the
scientific and historical actions of the last 200 years
and give some real thought, otherwise known as philosophy,
and make sense of what has happened into a philosophy....
we cannot afford philosophy to be 100 years behind the facts on
the ground...for once in its history, philosophy must try and not only
catch up, but to be ahead of what is happening to us and by us....
philosophy must not only engage in what was, but also what is,
and what will be, philosophically...that is the new task of
philosophy... to actually stay in touch with what is currently
happening in the world and anticipate it.....
and engage in the world, historically, scientifically, technologically,
politically and philosophically, with what is and what could be...
to remain current with world's events as they happen...
that is going to be a tough task, but given where we are today,
we have no choice.... remain current or die as a subject matter..
the very future of philosophy hangs in the balance...
either we help in finding solutions or we pack our bags
and go home...and philosophy dies the
death it deserves....if philosophy is unable to provide answers,
what is the point of philosophy?
Kropotkin