Philosophy Now Forum

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 34#image=1

So Trump apparently thinks that a general who is a "woke train wreck" did something that "would have been" punished by "death" (presumably at some point in our history)? Is that what he means? Or what does that mean? Are we talking about the past, when America was "great" to which we need to return "again" or are we talking about some other time?



Does anyone know?

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 7:09 pm https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 34#image=1

So Trump apparently thinks that a general who is a "woke train wreck" did something that "would have been" punished by "death" (presumably at some point in our history)? Is that what he means? Or what does that mean? Are we talking about the past, when America was "great" to which we need to return "again" or are we talking about some other time?



Does anyone know?

Trump has a few trials on the go right now, and for each of them he is recieving pre-trial discovery packets that tell him more about the state's case against him and this includes the names of witness whose testimony will be bad for him. But Trump cannot mention these details for fear of a gagging order, pre-trial detention, or even further charges for witness intimidation. But he wants to intimidate the witnesses against him...

So for the next few weeks or months, he will be posting a lot of these things where somebody he names is accused of disloyalty for some perplexing reason. Then, appropos of nothing, people like Walker and Wizzy will send them death treats over the interwibblies. Where do these names come from? Nowhere of course. Any coincidental overlap between a list of the people named in these tweets or truths or whatever and any list of witnesses agtainst Trump in any legal situation would be entirely an accident and nothing to send anyone to prison for 5 to 10 extra years over.