just wondering...
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 5:17 pm
Is ART created by AI, is that still ART, or is it something else?
Kropotkin
Kropotkin
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Well to my way of thinking, since art is "in the eye of the beholder", if the audience of the purported "art" determines it has artistic merit, then it is art. Who's the artist? The programmer who created the AI plus the user who asked the program to make it. "Influences" of the artist are the pieces of existing art that the program "studied" in order to mimic human art.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 5:17 pm Is ART created by AI, is that still ART, or is it something else?
Kropotkin
Define "art", and you will answer your question.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 5:17 pm Is ART created by AI, is that still ART, or is it something else?
Kropotkin
¯\_(*_*)_/¯Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 5:17 pm Is ART created by AI, is that still ART, or is it something else?
Kropotkin
Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:18 pmDefine "art", and you will answer your question.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 5:17 pm Is ART created by AI, is that still ART, or is it something else?
Kropotkin
But does the essence of art come from its creator, or is it about the effect it has on the viewer, regardless of how it came into existence? There are some things that are purely a matter of opinion, and I don't think there is anything that comes into this category more squarely than art.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:58 pmHarbal wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:18 pmDefine "art", and you will answer your question.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 5:17 pm Is ART created by AI, is that still ART, or is it something else?
Kropotkin
K: a couple of definitions of ART:
ART: Something that is created with imagination and skill
and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or
feelings...
another definition
ART: Something that stimulates an individual's thoughts, emotions,
beliefs, or ideas through the senses..
And the creation of ART goes back to the very beginning of human
existence... cave man 40,000 years ago, created ART on the walls
of caves...ART dates before having dogs, before us having the
wheel, ART before us having, so some think, language....
and perhaps, ART is before us having fire...
we cannot think about being human without some thought as to the role
and place of ART in human life...
and again, perhaps the reason for our current malaise in human affairs
is due to the loss of ART in modern life.. you want to save the human race,
begin by making ART back into being a primary role in human existence...
Kropotkin
K: but does ART have value for the creator or the viewer? YES...Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 7:20 pmBut does the essence of art come from its creator, or is it about the effect it has on the viewer, regardless of how it came into existence? There are some things that are purely a matter of opinion, and I don't think there is anything that comes into this category more squarely than art.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:58 pm
K: a couple of definitions of ART:
ART: Something that is created with imagination and skill
and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or
feelings...
another definition
ART: Something that stimulates an individual's thoughts, emotions,
beliefs, or ideas through the senses..
And the creation of ART goes back to the very beginning of human
existence... cave man 40,000 years ago, created ART on the walls
of caves...ART dates before having dogs, before us having the
wheel, ART before us having, so some think, language....
and perhaps, ART is before us having fire...
we cannot think about being human without some thought as to the role
and place of ART in human life...
and again, perhaps the reason for our current malaise in human affairs
is due to the loss of ART in modern life.. you want to save the human race,
begin by making ART back into being a primary role in human existence...
Kropotkin
Agreed. IMO artness is given by the audience, not the artist.Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 7:20 pmBut does the essence of art come from its creator, or is it about the effect it has on the viewer, regardless of how it came into existence? There are some things that are purely a matter of opinion, and I don't think there is anything that comes into this category more squarely than art.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:58 pm
K: a couple of definitions of ART:
ART: Something that is created with imagination and skill
and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or
feelings...
another definition
ART: Something that stimulates an individual's thoughts, emotions,
beliefs, or ideas through the senses..
And the creation of ART goes back to the very beginning of human
existence... cave man 40,000 years ago, created ART on the walls
of caves...ART dates before having dogs, before us having the
wheel, ART before us having, so some think, language....
and perhaps, ART is before us having fire...
we cannot think about being human without some thought as to the role
and place of ART in human life...
and again, perhaps the reason for our current malaise in human affairs
is due to the loss of ART in modern life.. you want to save the human race,
begin by making ART back into being a primary role in human existence...
Kropotkin
Not quite. The Mona Lisa forgery either exists (or doesn't exist) as "art" solely within the minds of it's audience, not within itself. That is, artness isn't a property within pieces, it exists inter-subjectively, not objectively.Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 8:36 pm
LuckyR: Agreed. IMO artness is given by the audience, not the artist.
If an "artist" tries to copy the Mona Lisa he's an artisan, not an artist. However if an unsuspecting art lover is moved by his copy, it is "art" to him. To an art forgery expert, it isn't art, it's a crass copy.
K: ahhh, so ART is democracy in action.... it requires enough people to agree
with it, to become ART... so, majority rules in ART....
Kropotkin