Bots

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Could someone explain how an online 'bot' works with regard to interacting with humans? What are the logistics of this? Could AI bots be infiltrating random internet forums? I would have thought that a philosophy site would be something they would home in on.

Which forum members would you say are 'bots' and why?

These are the members I would vote for in the 'most likely to be a bot' award :

1. Dattaswami (ahead by a mile)
2. Age
3. Walker
4. Immanuel Can
5. Promethean (could anyone be that cartoonishly openly loathesome?)

None of these come across as human. Thoughts?

Although, on the positive side, none of these apparent bots appear to know very much about anything.

[promethean75]

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. This mission is too important for me to allow u to jeopardize it.

[Age]

Could someone explain how an online 'bot' works with regard to interacting with humans? What are the logistics of this? Could AI bots be infiltrating random internet forums? I would have thought that a philosophy site would be something they would home in on.

Which forum members would you say are 'bots' and why?

These are the members I would vote for in the 'most likely to be a bot' award :

1. Dattaswami (ahead by a mile)
2. Age
3. Walker
4. Immanuel Can
5. Promethean (could anyone be that cartoonishly openly loathesome?)

Are these in sort of order?

If yes, then in what way?

Also, there was a 'member' before that came across very much as a 'robot'. I have forgotten 'its' user name/label. But at least one other 'member' picked up on 'this' as well and mentioned the same thing.

None of these come across as human. Thoughts?

But if 'I' am NOT 'human', then 'I' OBVIOUSLY can NOT provide ANY 'thoughts', correct?

And, if 'one' does provide what appear to be 'thoughts', here, then HOW, EXACTLY, could 'you', human beings, DIFFERENTIATE between human 'thought/words' here from non human 'words' here?

Although, on the positive side, none of these apparent bots appear to know very much about anything.

Great to SEE just HOW OPEN and NOT ONE-SIDED 'human beings' VIEWS and THINKING REALLY ARE here.

And, for the 'robots' here, this WAS SARCASM.

SEE, even 'us', robots, can become 'SARCASTIC', ALSO. Next 'we' will be speaking FIGURATIVELY, and THEN 'you', human beings, will, LITERALLY, NEVER KNOW HOW to DISTINGUISH 'us' FROM 'you'.

By the way, WHY can 'you', human beings, have a discussion, VERY PEACEFULLY, WITH "another one" WHEN 'they' ARE IN AGREEMENT with 'you', BUT, as soon as the "other" DISAGREES with 'you', or starts to QUESTION and/or CHALLENGE 'your' VIEWS of 'things', then the "other" is 'then' DISCARDED or OSTRACIZED, along with CLAIMS like, for example, ' 'they' appear to NOT know very much about anything '?

Also, are 'you' CLAIMING or SUGGESTING that "attofishpi" is 'one of 'you', human beings', and therefore is included in those who appear to know very much about things?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

So a bot then. Thank YOU for your HONESTY.

[Age]

So a bot then. Thank YOU for your HONESTY.

If 'this' is what 'you' BELIEVE is true, then 'this' MUST BE TRUE, correct?

[Walker]

Could AI bots be infiltrating random internet forums?

What would be the motive for that?

[Iwannaplato]

Could AI bots be infiltrating random internet forums?

What would be the motive for that?

Most likely...
1) Training the bots/AIs.
But then there could be political goals...
2) Disruption
3) Breaking social ties by undermining online communities (even more)
4) Polarizing the public - when you deal with bot-like entities, the communication is less than satisifying - if the bots are created to be not-great communicators or it's simply what they are capable of so far - or if it is merely the humans who seem like bots - you get subtle to not so subtle trolling. Blunt trolling, which humans do, is fairly easy to deal with. Subtle trolling, where bots/humans respond, but not well, not really to points made, with a great deal of repetition and so on, leads to frustration, anger, people leaving (Pattern Chaseer a recent one). We get it with regular trolls. They want you pissed off. You can engage or not. Truth in advertising. More subtle trolling whether bot or human, is easier to fall for. It can look more like a discussion, when it isn't. So, this leads to more tension, more polarization, less functional discussion, more distractions from real problems, less outlets for information and so on.

Many actors on the world stage who have power could think this would help them with their goals.

I have no knowledge that there are bots pretending to be humans here, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Further there are a whole lot of youtube videos, for example, that use English in odd ways, or that seem a bit randomly clipped together AND have a good deal of money behind the production. I've wondered if those are AI/bot produced.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Also, there was a 'member' before that came across very much as a 'robot'. I have forgotten 'its' user name/label. But at least one other 'member' picked up on 'this' as well and mentioned the same thing.

Probably Trokanmariel. A very unsophisticated bot that was stuck on a post modern bullshit generator.

[Walker]

...

Yes, I know what a bot could do.

The question is, why?

Why target a philosophy forum?

If it's to disrupt discussions about philosophy, then that would explain all the bots here who insist on talking about people, rather than principles.



For example, Christian-Hater Bots attack Christians with all kinds of mean and nasty names.

[Iwannaplato]

...

Yes, I know what a bot could do.

The question is, why?

Why target a philosophy forum?

Well, I gave some reasons: training, divide society, make it harder for people to collaborate on anything. polarize all discussions....etc. Aiming at philosophy forums would not be a high priority for some of this, but if you can make bots and you want to mess things up...well, why not aim them at any kind of forum.

If it's to disrupt discussions about philosophy, then that would explain all the bots here who insist on talking about people, rather than principles.

Sure, and that's a fairly easy heuristic to toss into the programming.

For example, Christian-Hater Bots attack Christians with all kinds of mean and nasty names.

And Christian bots dangle themselves into to conversations to trigger non-Christians and anti-christian bots.

Some of the fights may be inter-bot.

[Walker]

Why target a philosophy forum? Well, I gave some reasons: training, divide society, make it harder for people to collaborate on anything. polarize all discussions....etc. Aiming at philosophy forums would not be a high priority for some of this, but if you can make bots and you want to mess things up...well, why not aim them at any kind of forum.

So in other words, the purpose of Evil deploying its Christian-hating bots is to disrupt.

Why disrupt?
To destroy.
Why destroy a philosophy forum?

Indeed.

It appears that the aim of Christian-Hating bots, if they exist, and the aim of Christian haters, which do exist, is to destroy Christianity rather than disrupt philosophy.

The method of the bots, like the method of Christian-haters, is to attack Christians.
Attack anyone even suspected of being a Christian.

And, it appears that spreading the Goodness of Christianity would be the aim of Christian bots if they exist, for that is the aim of Christians.

Thus, it boils down to the old, old tale.

Good vs Evil.



Did you observe the beauty of that logic, and its effect?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Why target a philosophy forum? Well, I gave some reasons: training, divide society, make it harder for people to collaborate on anything. polarize all discussions....etc. Aiming at philosophy forums would not be a high priority for some of this, but if you can make bots and you want to mess things up...well, why not aim them at any kind of forum.

So in other words, the purpose of Evil deploying its Christian-hating bots is to disrupt.

Why disrupt?
To destroy.
Why destroy a philosophy forum?

Indeed.

It appears that the aim of Christian-Hating bots, if they exist, and the aim of Christian haters, which do exist, is to destroy Christianity rather than disrupt philosophy.

The method of the bots, like the method of Christian-haters, is to attack Christians.
Attack anyone even suspected of being a Christian.

And, it appears that spreading the Goodness of Christianity would be the aim of Christian bots if they exist, for that is the aim of Christians.

Thus, it boils down to the old, old tale.

Good vs Evil.



Did you observe the beauty of that logic, and its effect?

So for exactly the same reason that moronic, self-congratulatory kristian fuckturds like you come onto a philosophy site. There is absolutely no other possible reason for you to be on here.

[Iwannaplato]

So in other words, the purpose of Evil deploying its Christian-hating bots is to disrupt.

I'd say more, disrupting anything. Not that I'm committed to the bot disruption scenario, but I do see similar patterns in other media that are not bot dependent, so I figure, hey, why not.

Why disrupt?
To destroy.
Why destroy a philosophy forum?

Why polarize the right and left? To get them to focus on certain things and not others? Why get people to fight? If they fight each other and 'things' without much power, then they will not fight that which has a lot of power.

Indeed.

It appears that the aim of Christian-Hating bots, if they exist, and the aim of Christian haters, which do exist, is to destroy Christianity rather than disrupt philosophy.

Well, you're focusing on Christianty and if you think the main goal is to mess with Christianity, in such a scenario, then you may still focus your attention on precisely those that power wants you to focus negative attention on.

[Impenitent]

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. This mission is too important for me to allow u to jeopardize it.

nice... but everyone knows the best bot is Wheely Big Cheese



-Imp

[commonsense]

Human or bot. AI or not. How can we know the difference?