Page 1 of 1
The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:55 pm
by Eodnhoj7
Falsity is an absence of truth thus an absence. As an absence it is a negative limit, ie defining something by that which it is not (the limits of a thing). As a negative limit it is a limit thus falsity inherently exists and as existing has a truth value.
Re: The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 12:10 pm
by Walker
All believable lies contain an element of truth.
Re: The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2022 2:18 am
by CHNOPS
If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".
You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Re: The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:52 pm
by Eodnhoj7
CHNOPS wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 2:18 am
If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".
You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
Re: The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 3:44 pm
by CHNOPS
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:52 pm
CHNOPS wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 2:18 am
If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".
You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.
There are only True statements.
Re: The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:46 pm
by Eodnhoj7
CHNOPS wrote: ↑Tue Oct 18, 2022 3:44 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:52 pm
CHNOPS wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 2:18 am
If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".
You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.
There are only True statements.
Falsity is relativity as relativity is partial truths.
Re: The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 12:00 am
by CHNOPS
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:46 pm
CHNOPS wrote: ↑Tue Oct 18, 2022 3:44 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:52 pm
Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.
There are only True statements.
Falsity is relativity as relativity is partial truths.
Call it "falsity" if you want, but is just a right knowledge about something.
Are right knowledge relatives? Yes.
And I dont get then what you are saying.
Re: The Falsity Paradox
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:24 pm
by Eodnhoj7
CHNOPS wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 12:00 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:46 pm
CHNOPS wrote: ↑Tue Oct 18, 2022 3:44 pm
That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.
There are only True statements.
Falsity is relativity as relativity is partial truths.
Call it "falsity" if you want, but is just a right knowledge about something.
Are right knowledge relatives? Yes.
And I dont get then what you are saying.
All falsities contain an element of truth in the respect they require something that exists to be twisted, in another respect all falsities are true as falsities, and in a third respect all partial truths are false under different contexts and this is required by the fact that a partial truth is only true under a given context (in simpler terms: change the context and the truth value changes).