Page 1 of 1
to grok Good
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2022 7:55 pm
by Advocate
Good has the misfortune in English of opposing both bad (effects) and evil (intents).
Good is contingent on the salience, perspective, and priorities of everyone involved.
Group goods can Only be understood on relation to shared priorities.
Re: to grok Good
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:56 pm
by Walker
Must individual good always match group good, and if it does not, is that bad?
Re: to grok Good
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2022 1:57 pm
by commonsense
Whether individual or communal good, it is only necessary and always sufficient to grok bad and evil. To grok bad and evil, it is necessary and sufficient to grok good. Join the circle wherever you like!
Re: to grok Good
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 6:08 pm
by Advocate
[quote=Walker post_id=587269 time=1659300973 user_id=11599]
Must individual good always match group good, and if it does not, is that bad?
[/quote]
No. Yes. Sort of. It's complicated.
Re: to grok Good
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:58 am
by Age
Walker wrote: ↑Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:56 pm
Must individual good always match group good, and if it does not, is that bad?
It is not necessarily bad, but it always absolutely not all right.