puto wrote: ↑Mon Jul 11, 2022 9:17 am
The notes say that defining mathematical terms. Robert Nozick
Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Nozick, 151.) Enumerating numbers and making them sufficient but also necessary integers-base, inductive, and external cause. Thanks, as I had forgotten this because it was not important. Going, over my notes, again, brings back criteria to be fulfilled.
Mr Acedemic, as you say you are, I did not, ask you anything. I sent you to my page, that has the 400 plus links to my work. Do you know how stupid that was to bitch about me sending you to my work, and then you telling me not to send you to a web page because you are an academic. That you were not going to do the work, for me? You arrogant and pretensions fool who cannot even read? This is a forum. I do not sneak out the back door so people don't see how stupid I am.
Do not try that again. That was all my work on the Archive. Your sentences are not even close to being remotely near any Grammar.
Enumerating numbers? What the fuck! You are so illiterate, it is a wonder you are not in a hospital. If the academics in this world were not fools, your products, those you claim to have taught, would not be freaking idiots. I already know you are not going to do the work for anybody, because you never did it for yourself. I did, and am doing it because you great, pretentious, academic dumb shits are too busy dribbling bull shit can not think your way past the period of a sentence.
Yes, I already know you are too stupid to understand, we use numbers to count, to name with, and you claim that you need to name the names, and why? You need to count that which was the count???? Impressive! Unlike you, I find it a mental defect to pose a theory which only renames names and you actually pass this off to each other and pat each other on the back. The only thing great about it, you form your own mental institutions but they are certainly educational for the study of the mentally lame.
Please, don't talk to me, at all. Ever. I sent you to a pages that demonstrate, real work.
I am not looking for a boat anchor.
Every possible system of grammar is a method of creating and using names for a specific method of expressing binary recursion, and do you know how much bull shit there is in the academia that is only about renaming names which you believe is a clever way to impress other hopelessly lost illiterates. Renaming names, because you could not figure out how names are productively used to begin with, is complete mental failure. Not anything impressive. You cannot comprehend simple grammar, too stupid to know why, and then you can construct predicate calculus which solve your illiteracy? Really, hiding a fact under a pile of shit is not progress.
You demonstrate that you cannot use simple grammar, but blame the grammar, and start scribbling calling it a solution. You should not be proud, you should be locked up.
Every possible system of grammar is founded on an arithmetic identity between your ability to use symbols in accordance with a method of recursively using them. You have only demonstrated that you cannot comply with the simple principles of constructing the first grammar system. And your eagerness to hide the fact by obfuscation of your own mental failure.
This is the difference between your work and my work. You paid a corporation to make you a registered minister of bull shit. I paid for my work by working and proving it with actual mathematical programs! What a concept!
What the fuck is the difference between calling something religious based on mythology, and science based on mythology. You embrace mythology whole heartedly, and in your story, once again, you are the hero! I say, literacy is the hero, not me.
No No, that is not the man who is your savior, I am, really, see, I paid to become a minister of a different name, how clever!
When, you poor fool, does a grammar system, a noun, become a verb? It becomes one because you do not know the difference.
A unit, a thing, a relative within correlatives is also called a standard of behavior, a standard of behavior you have to set, and abide by for every system of grammar and you cannot do it, never done it. That is what I demonstrated by creating, and proving a Basic Analog Grammar, I did not rename names, I simply show you how to use them as implied in the first attempt at formalizing geometry,, the first Book of Euclid. You can put it in a book, but you cannot make anyone read it. Reading means comprehension, and Duh, does not mean okey dokey.
