Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Now, a lot of people complain that they simply cannot understand me, and that I am some kind of arrogant ass-hole, and I am actually the first to agree with them, except I appear to be arrogant because what I know is true, I will not budge from.
I have NEVER asked you, NOR expected you, 'to budge' from what you SAY and CLAIM is true, right, NOR correct.
But I would expect from one, if, and WHEN, one was to CLAIM that they were HIGHLY INTELLIGENT and that what they KNOW is true, IS true, then they would AT LEAST ATTEMPT to back up and support THEIR CLAIMS, or AT LEAST have the ABILITY to ELOBORATE ON and CLARIFY what they had previously STATED and CLAIMED was true. 'you', "phil8659", however, have, so far, FAILED on BOTH parts here. Which has left us WONDERING if you even do know what you SAY and CLAIM is true is even true AT ALL.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
So, have you ever imagined what is has been like for me to learn it?
You keep talking about and referring to this 'it' THING. BUT NEVER inform us of what 'it' IS, EXACTLY.
So, let us SEE what you do THIS TIME. What IS the 'it', which you have, SUPPOSEDLY, learned?
And, by the way, I have NEVER heard a child COMPLAIN about NOR say, "Have you ever imagined what it has been like for me to learn 'it' or ANY 'thing'?"
And, let us NOT FORGET, ALL 'children' probably learn MORE new thing, in their WHOLE lives, then 'adults' do in their WHOLE lives.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
A long time ago, I was asked to teach judgement, teach what I knew I had no knowledge of.
WHO asked you to do that?
WHY did they ask you to do that?
For all we KNOW you might have been asked to do that BECAUSE you were being such a Truly JUDGEMENTAL person, and that was one way of getting 'you' to take a GOOD HARD LOOK AT "yourself" "phil8659".
JUDGING by the way 'you' carry "yourself" here, it would NOT be TOO HARD to SEE that 'you' STILL ARE a Truly VERY JUDGEMENTAL person.
And, YES that first word in that last sentence was placed 'there' PURPOSELY.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
To ask me to do that involved solving problems that no one in history had solved before.
LOL UNTIL you PROVIDE AT LEAST SOME EXAMPLE of what 'you' ARE talking about and referring to here, ALL OF THIS may well EXIST SOLELY WITHIN YOUR OWN IMAGINATION.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
So, you think I am arrogant, think about that. How absurd to be asked to do that which you do not believe could be done!
'you' sound MORE and MORE psychotic or schizophrenic the MORE 'you' speak here, "phil8659".
WHO, EXACTLY, is thinking 'you' are 'arrogant'? This might well be the ONLY 'self-recognition' here.
WHO, EXACTLY, BELIEVES that you could NOT teach 'judgement'?
Absolutely ANY one CAN teach absolutely ANY thing, as long as they have LEARNED 'it' ENOUGH.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
When I was in training, as a kid,
In training for 'what', EXACTLY?
You ALLUDE to MANY 'things' "phil8659", but when QUESTIONED NEVER CLARIFY.
The only other one who might ALLUDE to MORE 'things', here in this forum, "phil8659" might possibly just be 'me'. But, I do this for a VERY SPECIFIC PURPOSE.
Anyway, as a kid, 'what' were 'training' for, EXACTLY, when you were training?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
I asked a question, which seemed simple enough to me.
Do I NEED to ask for CLARIFICATION with EVERY sentence of YOURS.
What WAS 'the' QUESTION you asked, which, supposedly, seemed SIMPLE ENOUGH to you?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Here is the answer I got back.
I would MUCH PREFER to KNOW the QUESTION FIRST.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
I was standing in the dark, suddenly I was hit by a bright light that penetrated me completely, I could not even close my eyes, it terrified me. I tried to run, but suddenly, the light dimmed down and I was in a field of beautiful flowers. What was the question I asked? I asked, why do people subjectively integrate with reality?
BECAUSE this is the ONLY WAY 'you', human beings, after a particular age, DO, INDIVIDUALLY, integrate with reality, and DID, COLLECTIVELY.
When 'you', human beings, COLLECTIVELY evolved ENOUGH, then 'you' started LOOKING AT and SEEING 'things' DIFFERENTLY. As partly explained in that book called, 'the bible', where "adam" and "eve" had evolved enough to KNOW 'Right' from 'Wrong', and to KNOW that they KNOW this. The words "adam" and "eve" were just USED to reference the evolution out of 'animal stage' and into the 'human stage', which is what is just prior to the 'next stage'. The words "adam", referencing dust/earth, and "eve" referencing 'out of' or 'evolving from', was to just the paint the picture and to illustrate just how 'human beings' came into Existence. They were, literally, Created, through and from Evolution.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
I was very young at the time.
How old is 'young'?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
So, what was the answer? I would not know for decades. Our whole body gives us the light, perception, and it is terrifying, a mind has to block a lot of it out.
Here is a PRIME EXAMPLE of one's BELIEFS BLOCKING what IS ACTUALLY True from 'coming through' and 'being SEEN'.
How does 'a body', like a human body,' "give 'you' the light"?
ONLY 'bodies' like stars, 'give 'you' the light', or 'bodies' like 'wood, oil, or coal' when they are burning or on fire 'gives 'you' the light', or 'bodies' of 'electricity and globes' 'gives 'you' the light'.
Without 'light' human bodies are nothing but just 'dark particles of matter'. For this Truth to become KNOWN, just put a human body in a darkened room and SEE just how MUCH 'light' is given by ANY or the WHOLE of that 'body'.
As for when some 'thing' is SEEN, UNDERSTOOD, or KNOWN, through the NON visible thinking or mental PART of the human 'body', which is ALSO KNOWN as WHEN some 'thing', 'comes to light', then HOW that ACTUALLY and FULLY occurs and happens, can be LOOKED AT, or INTO, FURTHER, and DISCUSSED, and then what IS ACTUALLY and IRREFUTABLY True can be SEEN, and UNDERSTOOD. But from the words you have USED and EXPRESSED here, YOUR ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS are keeping 'you' still a LONG WAY OFF, from this happening and occurring. Unless, OF COURSE, 'you', literally, BECOME somewhat MORE 'en-LIGHT-ened', and so WILL SURPRISE me, and CHANGE your WAYS here.
SEE, what ACTUALLY BLOCKS and PREVENTS 'the LIGHT' from being SEEN and SHONE is the 'brain' and NOT the 'Mind' AT ALL. In fact it is ACTUALLY the 'thoughts' AND the 'thinking' obtained by the brain over time, which is WHAT is STOPPING and PREVENTING thee Truth, and thee LIGHT, in the sense of EN-LIGHTEN-MENT of 'things', from 'coming through' AND being SEEN and UNDERSTOOD. Specifically it IS ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS that BLOCK thee LIGHT.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Eventually though, one learns to control it, and to do beautiful things with it.
What is the 'it' here, EXACTLY, which you mention and talk about? WHY does 'it', supposedly, NEED 'controlling'? And, if you have so far done 'beautiful things' with 'it', then what are those 'beautiful things', EXACTLY?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Now, many, when they try to understand my words do exactly the same thing, put a bag over my head, but it won't work.
In case you are BEING BLOCKED, being asked to ELABORATE ON and/or TO CLARIFY 'your words' is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what is could be called, "putting a bag over your head".
In other words, MY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS are INTENDED to, literally, BETTER UNDERSTAND YOUR POSITION and VIEWS.
For all 'I' and 'we' KNOW, 'you' MAY ACTUALLY have some VERY IN-SIGHT-FUL KNOWLEDGE, but 'I' for one am YET to SEE absolutely ANY from 'you'.
And this is CERTAINLY NOT from a LACK OF TRYING.
So, WHEN WILL 'you' START CLARIFYING YOUR WORDS, VIEWS, and POSITIONS?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
The Menorah of seven lamps is a metaphor for the seven life support systems of our body. All of the metaphors using 7 in the Bible, refer to perception.
I have had temper tantrums myself, demanding to be taught in plain, comprehensible English, but with one sentence, I was emotionally demolished for it. I was asked, in plain English, What do you think of your progress? I immediately burst into a passion of tears. I know I am stupid, yet I asked the smartest thing man has ever known, if I could have my lessons my way. Imagine the arrogance of that? Yup, arrogant ass I may be.
You are being SO ARROGANT here I am COMPLETELY IGNORANT of what 'it' IS that you are ACTUALLY trying to SAY and CONVEY here. Other than you ACTUALLY REALLY BELIEVE that 'you' are the smartest thing to have EVER LIVED, so far.
I am ALSO SO IGNORANT of what else you are 'trying to' SAY and CONVEY here that I do NOT even KNOW WHERE to BEGIN to UNRAVEL YOUR WORDS.
But let us START with: "your progress" in relation to 'what', EXACTLY?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
I have, asked myself, during my lessons over the years, why in the hell would I be given a task no one else in history could solve?
Again, WHO, EXACTLY, was it, which, supposedly, gave 'you' 'this task'?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
That which asked me had to be some kind of delusion, a delusion which could show me things I could not possibly know, so, my questions could never reflect fact. And I have been under a lot of pressure to do what I considered that I was too stupid and slow to do.
Which was 'what', EXACTLY?
Are you even AWARE of when you USE words like 'it' and 'that', when NOT in DIRECT relation to some ACTUAL 'thing', then what you are TALKING ABOUT and REFERRING TO, EXACTLY, is COMPLETELY LOST or NOT UNDERSTOOD?
OF COURSE, and OBVIOUSLY, 'you' KNOW what 'that' and 'it' IS, EXACTLY, because 'they' are WITHIN that head, or one would HOPE SO. But, UNTIL 'you' SHARE 'them' WITH 'us', without ASSUMING 'we' have absolutely NO idea AT ALL what could be said and argued, you are BABBLING ON ABOUT here.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
So, you have my work, I post it all as part of my personal learning and doing what I was asked, am I too stupid?
WHERE, EXACTLY, do 'I", supposedly, HAVE 'your work'? And, WHEN, EXACTLY, did 'I', supposedly, GET 'your work'?
Oh yeah, and WHAT, EXACTLY, was 'your work' ABOUT, AGAIN?
WHERE did you, supposedly, POST 'your work'?
By the way, you come off VERY STUPID, well to me anyway.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Answer anyway you like.
ALREADY HAVE.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
You cannot curse me any worse than the countless times I cursed myself, and even the one who seemed to believe that I could do it.
WHO or WHAT is 'the one', who seemed to believe that you could do 'it'? (Whatever the 'it' word refers to here).
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Grammar is the prophet, given to man.
WHO is this "prophet", EXACTLY, who was given the name "grammar" here?
And, WHY was "grammar" given to 'man' ALONE? Where 'woman' or 'children' given ANY thing?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Grammar, Judgment is the salvation of mankind.
Is this even a grammatically correct statement or sentence?
If yes, then HOW and WHY, EXACTLY?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
Only a fool imagines that it is some particular man, some particular doctrine, some particular theory, some particular organization.
What does the 'it' word here, in this sentence, refer to, EXACTLY?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:45 pm
It is what your own mind has to do, by biological fact.
'What', EXACTLY, is 'it' that your OWN 'mind', supposedly, HAS TO DO, by biological fact?
Oh, and by the way, IF 'you' have, " your OWN 'mind' ", as you SAY and CLAIM here, then WHO or WHAT is this 'thing', EXACTLY, which, supposedly, HAS 'its' OWN 'mind'?
And, are you AT ALL ABLE TO 'elaborate' on what this 'mind' thing IS, EXACTLY, which you speak of and talk about here?
If no, then WHY NOT?