Perceptible Versus Intelligible
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:51 pm
Plato was one, perhaps the only philosophy, who correctly understood the distinction between the perceptible and the intelligible, i.e. what the relationship is between body and mind, which was put into the metaphors of the Bible as Man is made in the Image of God. If there was ever, a single line I.Q. test, it would be that one sentence, God Created Man in his own image, in the image of God made he them, male and female, etc. That one statement is a concise statement in regard to the fact that life, even man, is a product of environmental stresses.
Plato explains it this way and he writes dialog to test your mind to see if you actually grasp it.
The perceptible is not intelligible, and the intelligible is not the perceptible. Euclid put it this way, the point is that which has no part. In symantics, the map is not the territory. Or again, virtual reality is not reality.
No one can see the intelligible, God, the only power there is, is the objective Universe. A mind, by biological fact, virtualizes the perceptible in order to do its biologically defined job.
A mind is a symbolic information processor. Nobody can see another's feelings or thought processes, in fact, a mind cannot see at all, as intimated in the metaphors of the Bible, a mind is blind. Our body is responsible for perception, a mind converts the perceptible into the intelligible, starting with simple memory. Thus, in metaphor, what defines man, what man is, when functional, in the image of God.
So how is it, that people claim to be philosophers, scientist, religious leaders, yet demonstrate that they can not even think their way out of a paper bag, that a simple metaphor is so far over their head, it starts them writing mountains of gibberish concerning a simple biological fact?
A mind can only read, using the whole body, process by mind, and write back to the body. Or in a metaphor, when man is functional, You shall love the Lord, Your God, with your whole body, mind, and soul. It is not mysticism, it is a simple, and beautiful, metaphor based on biological fact.
A mind uses binary recursion, all four methods, producing a Grammar Matrix in order to do its job. And so Christ put a biological fact into another metaphor, One must be born again in order to see the Kingdom of God. This is not mysticism by fact. We are born physically by our mother's matrix, we are born intelligibly when we learn how to process information using a Grammar Matrix, even told you in metaphor, that it is four grammar systems and it is a grammatical fact.
So, there you have it. A single line I.Q, test, but who during over two thousand years, had the wit to solve it?
If one is linguistically functional, then it is impossible not to know and believe in God. If one is illiterate it is impossible to know and believe in God.
No magic, no mysticism, just a true and factual outcome of grammatical fact.
A functional mind must know how to process Arithmetically, i.e. literally, and also Geometrically, i.e. metaphorically. Yet no such ability is shown by those who claim to be the world's greatest mind. Now that is the sorry condition of mind, for every one of them has failed a simple one question I.Q. test, What is God?
Plato explains it this way and he writes dialog to test your mind to see if you actually grasp it.
The perceptible is not intelligible, and the intelligible is not the perceptible. Euclid put it this way, the point is that which has no part. In symantics, the map is not the territory. Or again, virtual reality is not reality.
No one can see the intelligible, God, the only power there is, is the objective Universe. A mind, by biological fact, virtualizes the perceptible in order to do its biologically defined job.
A mind is a symbolic information processor. Nobody can see another's feelings or thought processes, in fact, a mind cannot see at all, as intimated in the metaphors of the Bible, a mind is blind. Our body is responsible for perception, a mind converts the perceptible into the intelligible, starting with simple memory. Thus, in metaphor, what defines man, what man is, when functional, in the image of God.
So how is it, that people claim to be philosophers, scientist, religious leaders, yet demonstrate that they can not even think their way out of a paper bag, that a simple metaphor is so far over their head, it starts them writing mountains of gibberish concerning a simple biological fact?
A mind can only read, using the whole body, process by mind, and write back to the body. Or in a metaphor, when man is functional, You shall love the Lord, Your God, with your whole body, mind, and soul. It is not mysticism, it is a simple, and beautiful, metaphor based on biological fact.
A mind uses binary recursion, all four methods, producing a Grammar Matrix in order to do its job. And so Christ put a biological fact into another metaphor, One must be born again in order to see the Kingdom of God. This is not mysticism by fact. We are born physically by our mother's matrix, we are born intelligibly when we learn how to process information using a Grammar Matrix, even told you in metaphor, that it is four grammar systems and it is a grammatical fact.
So, there you have it. A single line I.Q, test, but who during over two thousand years, had the wit to solve it?
If one is linguistically functional, then it is impossible not to know and believe in God. If one is illiterate it is impossible to know and believe in God.
No magic, no mysticism, just a true and factual outcome of grammatical fact.
A functional mind must know how to process Arithmetically, i.e. literally, and also Geometrically, i.e. metaphorically. Yet no such ability is shown by those who claim to be the world's greatest mind. Now that is the sorry condition of mind, for every one of them has failed a simple one question I.Q. test, What is God?