Philosophy Now Forum

I start watching, as I am engaged in a large project and the prep work is just menial, Ancient Astronauts Archive which can be found in the Internet Archive.
However, watching all the quoting of Zecharia Sitchin, I thought it would be interesting to study an individual who obviously tried to make a microwave hair dryer with disastrous results. Either that, or he was a test subject to the future of 5G phone service.
Now, this is actually unintended comedy by very straight-faced comedians. Reads like a version of Ron Hubbard.
Who knows, it might produce another dyslexic Hollywood actor to support it!
Any takes on this stuff?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 8:30 pm I start watching, as I am engaged in a large project and the prep work is just menial, Ancient Astronauts Archive which can be found in the Internet Archive.
However, watching all the quoting of Zecharia Sitchin, I thought it would be interesting to study an individual who obviously tried to make a microwave hair dryer with disastrous results. Either that, or he was a test subject to the future of 5G phone service.
Now, this is actually unintended comedy by very straight-faced comedians. Reads like a version of Ron Hubbard.
Who knows, it might produce another dyslexic Hollywood actor to support it!
Any takes on this stuff?

Yes.

You start watching what, EXACTLY?

You are engaged in what large project, EXACTLY?

What prep work is supposedly, so-called 'mental', EXACTLY? And,

What does 'is just mental' even mean or refer to, EXACTLY?

We can start here if you like, and then move onto the other 'stuff' here?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 1:23 am
Yes.

You start watching what, EXACTLY?

You are engaged in what large project, EXACTLY?

What prep work is supposedly, so-called 'mental', EXACTLY? And,

What does 'is just mental' even mean or refer to, EXACTLY?

We can start here if you like, and then move onto the other 'stuff' here?

You know, it is rude to mentally masturbate in public.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 1:23 am
Yes.

You start watching what, EXACTLY?

You are engaged in what large project, EXACTLY?

What prep work is supposedly, so-called 'mental', EXACTLY? And,

What does 'is just mental' even mean or refer to, EXACTLY?

We can start here if you like, and then move onto the other 'stuff' here?

You know, it is rude to mentally masturbate in public.

Some say it is 'ruder' to make CLAIMS, which you can NOT, and thus FAIL to, substantiate.

If you can NOT clarify what 'it' is that you talk about, then WHY say 'it' in the first place? Some say that making CLAIMS, which you FAIL to back up and support or substantiate is Truly 'mental masturbating'. If you can NOT or will NOT SHARE what you are, mentally, talking about, then you are, literally, mentally masturbating ALONE, and with "yourself" ONLY.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:41 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 1:23 am
Yes.

You start watching what, EXACTLY?

You are engaged in what large project, EXACTLY?

What prep work is supposedly, so-called 'mental', EXACTLY? And,

What does 'is just mental' even mean or refer to, EXACTLY?

We can start here if you like, and then move onto the other 'stuff' here?

You know, it is rude to mentally masturbate in public.

Some say it is 'ruder' to make CLAIMS, which you can NOT, and thus FAIL to, substantiate.

If you can NOT clarify what 'it' is that you talk about, then WHY say 'it' in the first place? Some say that making CLAIMS, which you FAIL to back up and support or substantiate is Truly 'mental masturbating'. If you can NOT or will NOT SHARE what you are, mentally, talking about, then you are, literally, mentally masturbating ALONE, and with "yourself" ONLY.

Are you practicing to try to get a role as a barking dog, or what? And you write like a 15 year old girl. Or, did you get your brains sucked out by your television? Maybe bad meds? So explain why you are a complete idiot? EXACTLY.
So, why you spend so much time trying to role play?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:41 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 1:23 am
Yes.

You start watching what, EXACTLY?

You are engaged in what large project, EXACTLY?

What prep work is supposedly, so-called 'mental', EXACTLY? And,

What does 'is just mental' even mean or refer to, EXACTLY?

We can start here if you like, and then move onto the other 'stuff' here?

You know, it is rude to mentally masturbate in public.

Some say it is 'ruder' to make CLAIMS, which you can NOT, and thus FAIL to, substantiate.

If you can NOT clarify what 'it' is that you talk about, then WHY say 'it' in the first place? Some say that making CLAIMS, which you FAIL to back up and support or substantiate is Truly 'mental masturbating'. If you can NOT or will NOT SHARE what you are, mentally, talking about, then you are, literally, mentally masturbating ALONE, and with "yourself" ONLY.

Well, whatever your affliction is, I don't think you can convince anyone that you have ever got through the first page of any book.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:51 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:41 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:35 am

You know, it is rude to mentally masturbate in public.

Some say it is 'ruder' to make CLAIMS, which you can NOT, and thus FAIL to, substantiate.

If you can NOT clarify what 'it' is that you talk about, then WHY say 'it' in the first place? Some say that making CLAIMS, which you FAIL to back up and support or substantiate is Truly 'mental masturbating'. If you can NOT or will NOT SHARE what you are, mentally, talking about, then you are, literally, mentally masturbating ALONE, and with "yourself" ONLY.

Are you practicing to try to get a role as a barking dog, or what?

No.

Are you INCAPABLE of CLARIFYING?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:51 am And you write like a 15 year old girl.

SO WHAT?

Are you 'trying to' imply that 15 year olds, and/or girls, write in some way that is inferior to your 'intellect'?

If no, then what are you trying to imply here?

Also, what you ASSUME here could or right, or wrong.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:51 am Or, did you get your brains sucked out by your television?

Well that is one OBVIOUSLY VERY STUPID and IDIOTIC question.

Do you REALLY want or expect me to answer it?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:51 am Maybe bad meds?

LOL WHY did you NOT just answer and CLARIFY the questions posed to you? You may have had written less than what you have so far.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:51 am So explain why you are a complete idiot? EXACTLY.

LOL
LOL
LOL

What are you basing your ASSUMPTION or BELIEF on here, EXACTLY?

Are you just 'trying to' DEFLECT from the Fact that you have so far been completely and utterly UNABLE to just back up and support or clarify what you have previously written here?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:51 am So, why you spend so much time trying to role play?

What are you on about now?

EITHER you CAN back up and support your CLAIMS, or, you CAN NOT. So far you are PROVING the latter.

You come here in this forum, start a thread, and then FALL TO PIECES when it comes time to clarify, or to just justify, what you wrote. What is WRONG with 'you' here, "phil8659"?

By the way, you have ALSO FAILED in showing ANY ABILITY in this regard in other threads of yours as well.

You CLAIM the MOST IDIOTIC things sometimes, which EXPLAINS WHY you are NOT CAPABLE of just backing up and supporting some of what you WRITE and CLAIM.

I will suggest to 'you', "phil8659", if you are NOT ABLE TO back up and support your WORDS and CLAIMS, then do NOT express them here, in an OPEN forum.

Also, 'trying to' ATTACK 'a person', and NOT the ACTUAL WORDS put before 'you', just SHOWS and REVEALS how WORTHLESS and USELESS 'you' REALLY ARE when it comes to TEACHING ANY thing AT ALL.

You came here with the BELIEF that you have 'things' to TEACH. YET, SO FAR, you have FAILED ABSOLUTELY. And, NOT just in regards to 'me' but to EVERY one else here. Unless, OF COURSE, there is someone who wants to say otherwise.

We will WAIT and SEE.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 4:08 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:41 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:35 am

You know, it is rude to mentally masturbate in public.

Some say it is 'ruder' to make CLAIMS, which you can NOT, and thus FAIL to, substantiate.

If you can NOT clarify what 'it' is that you talk about, then WHY say 'it' in the first place? Some say that making CLAIMS, which you FAIL to back up and support or substantiate is Truly 'mental masturbating'. If you can NOT or will NOT SHARE what you are, mentally, talking about, then you are, literally, mentally masturbating ALONE, and with "yourself" ONLY.

Well, whatever your affliction is, I don't think you can convince anyone that you have ever got through the first page of any book.

LOOK, if I can 'get through' a book, or even 'the first sentence' is of NO REAL concern to ANY one else here.

Whether or NOT 'you' can JUST inform 'us' of YOUR answers to MY first three questions, posed to you here, SHOWS and REVEALS if you are Truly STUPID or NOT.

So far you have SHOWN that you are NOT AT ALL ABLE to even just BEGIN to answer those three VERY SIMPLE QUESTIONS.

i like this guy better than the sitchin guy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Sadler

here's the thing tho. aliens and celestial beings who are intelligent enough to contact the erf and who want to announce their existence and/or the 'truth' about life and the universe, would be intelligent enough to know that few people would ever believe what a single guy said about anything. There's guys like that in churches, subways and philosophy forums that we don't believe... what makes this other guy any different. So, these beings would not use a medium or choose a single person to transmit any information to, or through.

Same thing goes for 'god' (which i briefly explained months ago). Like these celestial beings and aliens, 'god' also knows that a religious text would hardly constitute proof or provide evidence of 'his' existence.

We conclude therefore that if indeed an anthropomorohic 'god' capable or reasoning exists, it cannot be the 'god' described by any existing religious text... unless by luck alone; some guys got together wanting to start a religion and accidentally described 'god' correctly in their religion. But again, 'god' would not expect anyone to believe or have faith in the religion, and certainly would have no animosity toward atheists.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 4:41 pm i like this guy better than the sitchin guy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Sadler

here's the thing tho. aliens and celestial beings who are intelligent enough to contact the erf and who want to announce their existence and/or the 'truth' about life and the universe, would be intelligent enough to know that few people would ever believe what a single guy said about anything. There's guys like that in churches, subways and philosophy forums that we don't believe... what makes this other guy any different. So, these beings would not use a medium or choose a single person to transmit any information to, or through.

Same thing goes for 'god' (which i briefly explained months ago). Like these celestial beings and aliens, 'god' also knows that a religious text would hardly constitute proof or provide evidence of 'his' existence.

We conclude therefore that if indeed an anthropomorohic 'god' capable or reasoning exists, it cannot be the 'god' described by any existing religious text... unless by luck alone; some guys got together wanting to start a religion and accidentally described 'god' correctly in their religion. But again, 'god' would not expect anyone to believe or have faith in the religion, and certainly would have no animosity toward atheists.

I am drawn to descriptions of aliens that so stupid that they have taken to cutting peoples grass as a form of communication, myself. It kinda goes well with cutting the grass and smoking it too.

Now as far as dating women goes I can see wanting to be a crop duster and singing to the lady that you would like to dust her crop too. I mean, in both cases you really got to hard up? right? At my age, I don't think I'd mind some Viagra.