surreptitious reverse double first amendment audit trolley problems
Posted: Fri May 13, 2022 1:48 pm
Supposing i were to call the police on someone filming in an open but sensitive public area, a constitutionally protected activity, expecting police malfeasance, and then record the police response in order to gain evidence of them violating someone's rights, in order to sue them. And also approach the person afterward and tell them their rights and that they should have stood up for them.
Is there any ethical problem there?
Would it matter if it was the only viable way i could work to change a corrupt police department?
Would there be an ethical issue if the police responded appropriately?
What if the person has a warrant and gets shot running away?
What if i did it because i couldn't afford to get arrested?
What if i get caught recording the encounter and the footage is illegally erased?
What if i win a substantial private suit based not on my own footage but a public records request for the bodycam of the encounter?
Is there any ethical problem there?
Would it matter if it was the only viable way i could work to change a corrupt police department?
Would there be an ethical issue if the police responded appropriately?
What if the person has a warrant and gets shot running away?
What if i did it because i couldn't afford to get arrested?
What if i get caught recording the encounter and the footage is illegally erased?
What if i win a substantial private suit based not on my own footage but a public records request for the bodycam of the encounter?