Page 1 of 1
SunThomass isn't low-sun: Kim Cattrall's and Samantha Jones' Suntaming revolowshun
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 8:35 pm
by trokanmariel
Is this an accurate hypocrisy, of daylight . . .
Reset before movement, for the observer of daylight, on the condition that observation is needed by the planet, despite the fact that the planet has used movement before reset.
Re: SunThomass isn't low-sun: Kim Cattrall's and Samantha Jones' Suntaming revolowshun
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 8:49 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
The clear star that is yesterday is omni-present, much like candy. Thoughts?
Re: SunThomass isn't low-sun: Kim Cattrall's and Samantha Jones' Suntaming revolowshun
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:47 am
by attofishpi
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 8:49 pm
The clear star that is yesterday is omni-present, much like candy. Thoughts?
I totally agree as i am sure trokanmariel will.
Re: SunThomass isn't low-sun: Kim Cattrall's and Samantha Jones' Suntaming revolowshun
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 2:30 pm
by alan1000
On the other hand, I can't remember whether I ate candy two weeks ago or not. Do you think I should seek counselling?