Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:54 pm
So, to answer your question here,
God KNOWS God. Just as I have been POINTING OUT and SAYING all along. That is; if one had taken the time to CLARIFY what I had been SAYING instead of just GUESSING and ASSUMING what I had been.
Who knows God is the God known as concept in this conception...God is a concept known, that knows nothing.
LOL but this is only what 'you' "know". This is NOT what God KNOWS.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
That's what God is, that's what a concept is...a known concept is this immediate knowing, aka conception, the only knowing there is one without a second.
In other words, every concept is known by the only knowing there is...so concepts in and of themselves do not know.
I KNOW. We have gone through this BEFORE. So, there is NO need to keep REPEATING this ALREADY OBVIOUS KNOWN Fact, okay?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
In other words no thing knows itself.
But I KNOW who 'I' am - Thy Self, just like God KNOWS God - its Self.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
And that is what God is. God is one with itself forever and infinitely always.
Yes, we have gone through this ALREADY, ALSO.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
When a murder is commited, that's known by the only knowing there is.
And, what EXACTLY IS, 'the only knowing there is', to you?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
When someone helps an old lady cross a busy road, that's known by the only knowing there is.
When someone knows that murdering little innocent children is bad, that's known by the only knowing there is.
So, to you, 'the only knowing there is' IS 'someone', correct?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
When someone robs your home of all it's content, that's known by the only knowing there is.
What is known arises in the exact same instant of knowing, which is always a unitary action. Then what appears to happen is there is an apparent reaction to what's already happened, the reaction is also known, as a second order knowing upon what has already happened that is not known to have happened except in the knowledge that manifests as a reaction...in other words, in the unitary actions own conception, known as a reaction.
I will ask you AGAIN, like I did in our very first discussions, Would you like some help to express, in VERY CLEAR and VERY SIMPLE terms, what 'it' is that you are STILL 'trying to' EXPRESS here?
If you STILL do NOT want ANY help AT ALL, then PLEASE continue on as you are and have been.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
There is only ''knowing'' that cannot be known. What matters ..is what something is, not what it is called. ISness is, and it's all there IS
How are 'you' going to KNOW what some 'thing' IS, if 'you' do NOT use 'words', or, in other words, do not use the labels, names, nor words that those 'things' are ACTUALLY 'called', AND KNOWN BY?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
Sorry to keep repeating the same thing over and over again.
WHY are 'you' SORRY to keep doing the SAME 'thing' over and over AGAIN?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:58 am
But that's what happens when there is a dialog with other, which is the self talking to itself only, because the self can know no other self, only itself.
.
But the word 'self' refers to an individual human being. Of which there are PLENTY and MANY, especially in the days 'you' are writing this "dontaskme", compared to previously.