A Senseless Argument 2
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2021 11:28 pm
1. There is being.
2. There is an absence of being as a deficiency of being.
3. There are two states to being as "being as a whole" and "being as a part". Whole is respective to being, part is respective to deficiency of being.
4. "Being as a whole" exists in relationship to "being as a part" thus both function together as a whole.
5. The relationship between "being as a whole" and "being as a part" results in a contrast considering this relationship points to two parts, thus both function as parts and not as a whole.
6. "Wholism" is a part of "Multiplicity". "Multiplicity" is the whole of the "whole".
7. A contradiction occurs through the application of the "whole" and the "multiple" thus necessitating contradiction underlying these to foundations of measurement thus measurement itself.
2. There is an absence of being as a deficiency of being.
3. There are two states to being as "being as a whole" and "being as a part". Whole is respective to being, part is respective to deficiency of being.
4. "Being as a whole" exists in relationship to "being as a part" thus both function together as a whole.
5. The relationship between "being as a whole" and "being as a part" results in a contrast considering this relationship points to two parts, thus both function as parts and not as a whole.
6. "Wholism" is a part of "Multiplicity". "Multiplicity" is the whole of the "whole".
7. A contradiction occurs through the application of the "whole" and the "multiple" thus necessitating contradiction underlying these to foundations of measurement thus measurement itself.