Health Care As Philosophy
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2021 5:10 pm
As governments and corporations have slowly [but surely] transplanted health care from the private to the public domain, individuals have lost not only the ability to manage their care, but much more important, the life philosophy of each person [which historically guided decisions affecting their care] has been supplanted by the demands of a centralized systems catering only to the needs of large institutions. As we are all aware, patients [and their rights] have been morphing into customers [with few or no rights] over the past several decades.
The disheartening results of government, corporate, or hybrid dominated health care systems were quite predictable and have followed the same course as did the annexation of many other large institutions, e.g., education, law, transportation, finance/banking, regulation, etc. Again, we witness similar patterns of centralization with concurrent loss of individual autonomy playing-out throughout the Western world. Add in hefty portions systemic and individual corruption and it is not difficult to see why we have been delivered to the brink.
The most important dynamic between provider and patient is whether the patient can accurately elucidate their philosophy of health care, an understanding that is procured as part of an overall history. A provider should not only desire to have the most definitive understanding of the patient's health issue[s], but get a keen sense of how they might wish to proceed, as well. Unfortunately, this critical step is often neglected as it is no longer the patient who is directing their care, it is the institution instead that has decided [in advance] what type of care each patient will receive based on projected group outcomes.
Providers are encouraged to give uniform care to patients [both within their own patient-bases and between providers] so as to increase institutional efficiencies and outcomes based on what the institutions feel are important [as opposed to what each patient may feel is important]. The patient has lost autonomy [and individuality] becoming part of a group that can be managed institutionally.
COVID19 has provided a plethora of examples of how this group management mentality has poisoned health care systems throughout the Western world and subjected individuals to all kinds of bizarre policy designed only to allow institutions to manage the group. As should be quite apparent to anybody paying attention, this has been an abject failure of Herculean proportions and will hopefully lead to a de-centralization of health care going forward. It is only when the individual patient's personal health care philosophy can be implemented by their provider do outcomes begin to meet actual patient needs.
The disheartening results of government, corporate, or hybrid dominated health care systems were quite predictable and have followed the same course as did the annexation of many other large institutions, e.g., education, law, transportation, finance/banking, regulation, etc. Again, we witness similar patterns of centralization with concurrent loss of individual autonomy playing-out throughout the Western world. Add in hefty portions systemic and individual corruption and it is not difficult to see why we have been delivered to the brink.
The most important dynamic between provider and patient is whether the patient can accurately elucidate their philosophy of health care, an understanding that is procured as part of an overall history. A provider should not only desire to have the most definitive understanding of the patient's health issue[s], but get a keen sense of how they might wish to proceed, as well. Unfortunately, this critical step is often neglected as it is no longer the patient who is directing their care, it is the institution instead that has decided [in advance] what type of care each patient will receive based on projected group outcomes.
Providers are encouraged to give uniform care to patients [both within their own patient-bases and between providers] so as to increase institutional efficiencies and outcomes based on what the institutions feel are important [as opposed to what each patient may feel is important]. The patient has lost autonomy [and individuality] becoming part of a group that can be managed institutionally.
COVID19 has provided a plethora of examples of how this group management mentality has poisoned health care systems throughout the Western world and subjected individuals to all kinds of bizarre policy designed only to allow institutions to manage the group. As should be quite apparent to anybody paying attention, this has been an abject failure of Herculean proportions and will hopefully lead to a de-centralization of health care going forward. It is only when the individual patient's personal health care philosophy can be implemented by their provider do outcomes begin to meet actual patient needs.