What I Don't Believe
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2021 7:06 pm
What I Don't Believe
The following lists most of the more important views I regard as wrong and do not hold:
Every ideology (-ism) is always wrong.
..,Atheism is wrong.
...Theism is wrong.
...Altruism is wrong.
...Socialism is wrong.
...All collectivism is wrong.
... All political ideologies are wrong.
......All political parties are wrong.
......Libertarianism is wrong.
......Objectivism is wrong.
......Anarchism is wrong.
......All government is wrong.
......All man-made laws are wrong.
......There is no such thing as rights.
......There is no such thing as morality.
No philosopher in history was right. (A very small number got some things right, but are mostly forgotten or marginalized today.)
Academia is anti-knowledge.
All so-called philosophies are ideologies and wrong.
All so-called Eastern philosophy is irredeemable nonsense.
All religion is nonsense.
All mysticism is nonsense.
All skepticism (and sophism) is wrong.
There is certain knowledge.
All real science is valid.
...Fundamental physics is real science.
...Fundamental chemistry is real science.
...Most of biology (and medicine) is real science.
...Real science is the basis of all successful technology.
Most so-called science today is not science, but pseudo-science.
...Psychology is not science.
...Sociology is not science.
...Ecology (and environmentalism) are not science.
...Anthropology is not science.
...Cosmology is not science.
...Evolution is not science.
The only purpose of this list is to save some time for those who assume things in our discussions about my views and address those views as arguments when they are not my views at all. Very often someone will explain what is wrong with some point I am making with, "Well, that's because your are an Atheist," or, "that's just your Libertarian view," (neither of which I am). Even worse are those who use as arguments something some supposed philosopher or pseudo-scientific authoriy said, when I regard those authorities as wrong.
I have no interest in convincing anyone else to adopt my views (or any views). One should never accept any view as correct if their own best reason from the best evidence available to them does not convince them it is true. It is better to remain ignorant than to fill a gap in one's knowledge with what is not true.
Someone is sure to notice, with the exception of science, the list is entirely negative, because the intention is only to save others the trouble of assuming I hold views that I do not. This should not be construed to assume I have no positive views. The truth is, all of those views I do not hold are because I am so certain of the things I do know, I cannot possibly accept all these lies that contradict what I know.
It may also be observed that most of what I have listed are what most of the world believes. For those who are really interested, I've addressed elsewhere why most of what most people believe is not true:
Why Do Most People Believe What Is Not True?
Deceitful Trinity—Religion, Philosophy, and Pseudo-science
If anyone is interested in what I do know and what my own views are they are certainly no mystery and I have explained them all many many times, even here on the Philosophy Now forum:
Philosophy, If You Want It
Ultimate Reality
Ontology Introduction
The Nature of Life
The Nature of Consciousness
Perception
The Nature of the Mind
Not Everything Is Physical
The Physical, Life, Consciousness, and The Human Mind—A Preface
An Analogy, From Physical To Mind
Science Philosophy
Epistemology, Concepts
Epistemology, Propositions
Silly Religion
Religion and Absolute Moral Values—The Ten Commandments, For Example
Independence—Better Than Morality
Why Be Moral?
VALUES
The Moral Nature
There Are No Miracles
Certain Knowledge
Only Individuals
Are You Enjoying Your Life?
The First Question Of Ethics
The Second Question of Ethics
What does, "moral," mean?
Controllers, Meddlers and Individualists
Only Individuals Matter
To see all my views and writing visit the Free Individual.
The following lists most of the more important views I regard as wrong and do not hold:
Every ideology (-ism) is always wrong.
..,Atheism is wrong.
...Theism is wrong.
...Altruism is wrong.
...Socialism is wrong.
...All collectivism is wrong.
... All political ideologies are wrong.
......All political parties are wrong.
......Libertarianism is wrong.
......Objectivism is wrong.
......Anarchism is wrong.
......All government is wrong.
......All man-made laws are wrong.
......There is no such thing as rights.
......There is no such thing as morality.
No philosopher in history was right. (A very small number got some things right, but are mostly forgotten or marginalized today.)
Academia is anti-knowledge.
All so-called philosophies are ideologies and wrong.
All so-called Eastern philosophy is irredeemable nonsense.
All religion is nonsense.
All mysticism is nonsense.
All skepticism (and sophism) is wrong.
There is certain knowledge.
All real science is valid.
...Fundamental physics is real science.
...Fundamental chemistry is real science.
...Most of biology (and medicine) is real science.
...Real science is the basis of all successful technology.
Most so-called science today is not science, but pseudo-science.
...Psychology is not science.
...Sociology is not science.
...Ecology (and environmentalism) are not science.
...Anthropology is not science.
...Cosmology is not science.
...Evolution is not science.
The only purpose of this list is to save some time for those who assume things in our discussions about my views and address those views as arguments when they are not my views at all. Very often someone will explain what is wrong with some point I am making with, "Well, that's because your are an Atheist," or, "that's just your Libertarian view," (neither of which I am). Even worse are those who use as arguments something some supposed philosopher or pseudo-scientific authoriy said, when I regard those authorities as wrong.
I have no interest in convincing anyone else to adopt my views (or any views). One should never accept any view as correct if their own best reason from the best evidence available to them does not convince them it is true. It is better to remain ignorant than to fill a gap in one's knowledge with what is not true.
Someone is sure to notice, with the exception of science, the list is entirely negative, because the intention is only to save others the trouble of assuming I hold views that I do not. This should not be construed to assume I have no positive views. The truth is, all of those views I do not hold are because I am so certain of the things I do know, I cannot possibly accept all these lies that contradict what I know.
It may also be observed that most of what I have listed are what most of the world believes. For those who are really interested, I've addressed elsewhere why most of what most people believe is not true:
Why Do Most People Believe What Is Not True?
Deceitful Trinity—Religion, Philosophy, and Pseudo-science
If anyone is interested in what I do know and what my own views are they are certainly no mystery and I have explained them all many many times, even here on the Philosophy Now forum:
Philosophy, If You Want It
Ultimate Reality
Ontology Introduction
The Nature of Life
The Nature of Consciousness
Perception
The Nature of the Mind
Not Everything Is Physical
The Physical, Life, Consciousness, and The Human Mind—A Preface
An Analogy, From Physical To Mind
Science Philosophy
Epistemology, Concepts
Epistemology, Propositions
Silly Religion
Religion and Absolute Moral Values—The Ten Commandments, For Example
Independence—Better Than Morality
Why Be Moral?
VALUES
The Moral Nature
There Are No Miracles
Certain Knowledge
Only Individuals
Are You Enjoying Your Life?
The First Question Of Ethics
The Second Question of Ethics
What does, "moral," mean?
Controllers, Meddlers and Individualists
Only Individuals Matter
To see all my views and writing visit the Free Individual.