Page 1 of 1
the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:41 pm
by Advocate
100% of evidence is of material reality. The only discrepancies are in interpretation.
If you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
Re: the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:31 pm
by attofishpi
Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:41 pm
100% of evidence is of material reality. The only discrepancies are in interpretation.
precisely, so Y does it MATTER?
Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:41 pmIf you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
...and who or what is going to be the brain bank of what is REAL or FALSE?
Re: the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 10:02 pm
by Advocate
[quote=attofishpi post_id=493267 time=1611952303 user_id=6293]
[quote=Advocate post_id=493243 time=1611942077 user_id=15238]
100% of evidence is of material reality. The only discrepancies are in interpretation.[/quote]
precisely, so Y does it MATTER?
[quote=Advocate post_id=493243 time=1611942077 user_id=15238]If you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
[/quote]
...and who or what is going to be the brain bank of what is REAL or FALSE?
[/quote]
That's what evidence is all about.
Re: the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 11:06 pm
by attofishpi
Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:41 pm
100% of evidence is of material reality. The only discrepancies are in interpretation.
precisely, so Y does it MATTER?
Advocate wrote:attocunt wrote:Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:41 pmIf you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
...and who or what is going to be the brain bank of what is REAL or FALSE?
That's what evidence is all about.
SO THEN - based on what U have stated...how do U or anyone decide what IS the actual EVIDENCE - TRUE OR FALSE?
(and btw DUDE - wot is wrong with your ability to quote on a forum? !!!!!!! )