Philosophy Now Forum

The convergence and divergence of viewpoints, or rather self-evident truths as axioms, paradoxically lends itself to a viewpoint that supersedes the actions of philosophy as a whole thus summiting them under a single viewpoint.

In simpler terms the cycling of viewpoints, between a thesis and antithesis, is in itself a viewpoint of viewpoints.

This singular viewpoint, as the summation of a series of viewpoints, creates a paradox as no antithetical element to it can be presented other than a simple "no it is not true".

An anti-perspectivist stance can be promoted as a counter to this point, yet this in itself is a perspective, thus a contradiction occurs.

This contradiction is nothing other than a distinction of one point of view relative to another through a contrast.

By default, all of reality is perspectivism.
Humans are part and parcel of reality as all-there-is.
What-is-reality, it is co-emergent with humans.
Such co-emergent reality when expressed by humans can only be inevitably from the perspective of humans, thus perspectivism.