Is this a new form of logical notation?
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:37 am
In forming a basic logic considering all is context:
1. (X) for context
2. ((X)Y) for context of context or context within context as a modality or that which describes. This modality, as a fraction of the original context, is divisive by nature considering this context is part of a prior context.
3. (X)(Y) for context transitioning to another context as in the original context is multiplying to a new context. One context, or set of contexts, change into another thus multiplying the original context through new contexts. Each context, as fundamentally empty, multiplies itself through its progression to a new context.
4. ((X)Y-->) for a transitional context or the context transitioning to another context through a basic action such as a verb. One context acts as a means of transition to another context. This transitional context as descriptive, considering it is a set of actions which define the prior context, shares the same form as "((x)y)". This context is empty in itself and as empty acts as the variation of one context into a newer form.
5. (X,Y) observes the "and" function such as "The cat and dog ate the food" and would be described as ((C,D)A--->)(F). This "and" function applies to addition as well.
6. ((X))((Y)) observes the "or" function such as "The cat or the dog ate the food" and would be described as ((((C))((D)))A--->)(F)
7. (X)<-->(Y) observes "if" function such as "The cat ate the food if the cat is full" and would be described as (((C)A-->)(F))<-->((C)F)
A. The cat eats cat food.
((Cat)eats-->) ((Food)Cat)
B. It rains in November
(((It )rains-->)November)
C. The sky is blue.
((Sky)is-->)(Blue) or ((sky)blue)
D. 1+1=2
(((1)1-->)-->) (2) or ((1, 1)-->)(2)
E. 1+2=3
(((1)2-->)-->) (3) or ((1, 2)-->)(3)
F. 2-1=1
(((2)-1-->)-->) (1) or ((2 -1)-->) (1)
G. 2x2=4
(((2)(2))-->)(4)
H. 4/2=2
(((4)2)-->)(2)
1. (X) for context
2. ((X)Y) for context of context or context within context as a modality or that which describes. This modality, as a fraction of the original context, is divisive by nature considering this context is part of a prior context.
3. (X)(Y) for context transitioning to another context as in the original context is multiplying to a new context. One context, or set of contexts, change into another thus multiplying the original context through new contexts. Each context, as fundamentally empty, multiplies itself through its progression to a new context.
4. ((X)Y-->) for a transitional context or the context transitioning to another context through a basic action such as a verb. One context acts as a means of transition to another context. This transitional context as descriptive, considering it is a set of actions which define the prior context, shares the same form as "((x)y)". This context is empty in itself and as empty acts as the variation of one context into a newer form.
5. (X,Y) observes the "and" function such as "The cat and dog ate the food" and would be described as ((C,D)A--->)(F). This "and" function applies to addition as well.
6. ((X))((Y)) observes the "or" function such as "The cat or the dog ate the food" and would be described as ((((C))((D)))A--->)(F)
7. (X)<-->(Y) observes "if" function such as "The cat ate the food if the cat is full" and would be described as (((C)A-->)(F))<-->((C)F)
A. The cat eats cat food.
((Cat)eats-->) ((Food)Cat)
B. It rains in November
(((It )rains-->)November)
C. The sky is blue.
((Sky)is-->)(Blue) or ((sky)blue)
D. 1+1=2
(((1)1-->)-->) (2) or ((1, 1)-->)(2)
E. 1+2=3
(((1)2-->)-->) (3) or ((1, 2)-->)(3)
F. 2-1=1
(((2)-1-->)-->) (1) or ((2 -1)-->) (1)
G. 2x2=4
(((2)(2))-->)(4)
H. 4/2=2
(((4)2)-->)(2)