Morality is Confined to the Human Species
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:36 am
What is morality is most effectively when confined to the human species only.
This is where we can draw the line between not killing humans & other actions related to human and the killing living non-humans for food and other reasons.
Then we can draw a further line why it is wrong to kill non-humans for pleasure and unjustified reasons, BUT such killing are not a matter of morality-proper.
Note, the above point DO NOT tantamount to killing and injuring is morally-right as most would counter-argue.
Since non-humans are outside the scope of morality, it is not logical to relate them to morality, except;
When living non-humans contribute positive interests to human individuals of the species, e.g. as pets, provide alternative labor, etc.
There are cases where it is wrong to kill and harm living non-humans, BUT such acts are not dealt within morality but other Framework and System, e.g. legal, veganism, social, customs, compassion, various laws, etc.
Agree/Disagree?
This is where we can draw the line between not killing humans & other actions related to human and the killing living non-humans for food and other reasons.
Then we can draw a further line why it is wrong to kill non-humans for pleasure and unjustified reasons, BUT such killing are not a matter of morality-proper.
Note, the above point DO NOT tantamount to killing and injuring is morally-right as most would counter-argue.
Since non-humans are outside the scope of morality, it is not logical to relate them to morality, except;
When living non-humans contribute positive interests to human individuals of the species, e.g. as pets, provide alternative labor, etc.
There are cases where it is wrong to kill and harm living non-humans, BUT such acts are not dealt within morality but other Framework and System, e.g. legal, veganism, social, customs, compassion, various laws, etc.
Agree/Disagree?