Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 2:08 am Philosophical treatises are mirrors for people's personal bias.
Nice Eod. I had a play with this.
Follow this:
Philosophical treatises are mirrors for people's personal bias
(Knowledge) treatises are mirrors for peoples bias
Knowledge treatises are mirrors for peoples (anointed, Knowledge Doctrines)
Knowledge mirrors peoples (Knowledge)
Now:
The constituents of what is the Constitution Person/People is Knowledge per se. Very hard to argue that 'what is person' is not -
some form of - Knowledge-of...
So:
Knowledge mirrors (Knowledge)
Therefore:
Being (Knowledge/person) is an effect of imaging (mirroring) Knowledge.
Being (Form) is an effect of imaging Form.
"
let us make man in our image" 1:27 - seems fitting...
Discussion:
All Knowledge/Form is effects of belief. Being says Form is 'ing-ing', an expression stating Form existence -
triumph over not-Form - over time. Form generation/being results from belief, Form de-generation/de-being results from no-belief.
The dendritic 'Tree of Knowledge' (Form/people) is indeed agented/spirited by belief. Belief to which declares-in/instantiates-in/professes-in/decrees-in more dendritic Knowledge. Conversely, not-belief collapses the Tree of Knowledge, or de-generates the Tree of Knowledge.
Now belief agency spawns in the absence of knowing, that is belief 'becomes' in not-knowing/not-contemplating/not-thinking with Knowledge as its effect.
The antithetical belief -
that is knowing - dethrones Knowledge, subjugates Knowledge, returns Knowledge to its rightful subordinate cast beneath knowing. Knowing 'prunes' one's Tree of Knowledge, drops one's pride/identification-with/anointment-of Knowledge and, spirits grace and humility...divine virtues indeed.
Conclusion:
"Philosophical treaties mirror a person's bias' ". Yes, and they are more proliferated by belief (not-knowing) than knowing. They (doctrines) subsist via the indoctrinated. They (Knowledge) subsists via dead knowing (belief).
