All philosophy is inherently bias. This bias is rooted in the inherent subjective angles a subject is subject to. This bias necessitates an absence of progression except through the points of view already established as the bias itself.
Philosophical discussion is less about progressing past a viewpoint and more as the progression of an already established angle of observation. Even supposedly new "viewpoints" are mere variations of underlying viewpoints already established but underdeveloped.
It it this angle of observation that maintains itself as fundamentally the root of all philosophical dialect as the dialect itself. Two, or more, viewpoints converge for a period of time only to progressively diverge and reconverge over the topics established. Philosophy thus becomes a synthetic cycling between premises. This however paradoxically lends itself to a viewpoint that supersedes the actions of philosophy as a whole and thus summating them under a single viewpoint. This singular viewpoint, as the summation of a series of viewpoints, creates a paradox as no antithetical element to it can be presented other than a simple "no it is not true". An antiperspectivism stance is promoted, yet this in itself itself is a perspective, thus a contradiction occurs.
Philosophy is thus contradiction by its very nature, with the root of all contradictions occuring through the dualistic nature of dialectic itself. Philosophy becomes less a solution of contradictions as it becomes more of a promotion of contradiction for contradictions sake. The prime axiom of philosophy itself is contradiction through dialectic where solutions are less the anticipated course of philosophy but rather the maintainance of already held positions in the face of a antithetical state.
The prime purpose of philosophy reflects a form of self discovery, where the subjective point of view is reinforced against everything it is not. Philosophy thus takes the role of exploring a respective void where the already established point of view is tested and retested, in the face of continual obliteration, to reveal what goes on underneath. This void is the root of the division where both perspectives, those which occur through the dialectic, cycle between eachother on the precipice of "being". Dialectic is thus rooted in a Nothingness that all discourse hovers around leading philosophy as a dynamic state of revealing the interior nuances of an already established bias.
There is no solution to the "philosophical problem" as the problem itself is the very same solution that underlies all philosophical discourse. "The problem" is maintained as self evident because what is not self evident is what lies beneath "the problem". All axioms thus reflect a nature of being problematic as they are the means of dividing a proposition into further propositions in an effort to promote change. This change is less of a change from one bias to another but the promotion of change within the bias itself.
The change from one bias to a more complex bias is the reflection of "being", that which exists through the perspective of the observer, in the face of a complete voiding of that very same "being". Philosophy thus takes a role as a self reflective property through the surgical analysis presented through voiding. What voids a proposition is that which expands that very same axiom into a newer state of being. Dialectic thus takes the form of bias renewal with this bias renewal further necessitating that perspectives themselves, or one could say the core propositions behind those perspectives, are grounded in a dynamic change that leaves them as fundamentally formless assertions at their root point.
The dialectic thus takes the role of revealing what lies underneath the subconscious and giving it conscious form. It may even be taken a step further and said that the dialectic takes the role of revealing where the intended proposition is fundamentally empty of form and takes on a spontaneous nature. This spontaneous nature, where the bias proposition is broken down to its core root, thus subjects the bias as a product of chance with this chance being the spontaneity of the order resulting from the build up of said proposition.
The dialectic's means go far beyond finding and renewing the root of a bias proposition and goes well into the nature of its order as subject to a game of chance in which a viewpoint occurs because it is statistically inevitable to occur. Being, as an expression of the propositions which form it, thus takes on a nature of probabalism where a viewpoint is expressed as a statistical inevitability in light of a whole range of propositions. This nature of chance, as statistical inevitability, reflects a deep underlying nature of causality or determinism that results in the viewpoint itself.
One bias results in another bias and what occurs is a series of ever expanding spirals of reasoning, all different in content yet sharing the exact same form from which they originate. A proposition is halved into a thetical and antithetical element with this halving in turn occuring again and again to any possible synthesis which results from its prior state. The dialectic thus takes the form of proposition division, where each proposition (a bias perspective by default) is broken down into qualitative quantities of either a dualism or a triad. While the propositions may differ, what does not differ is their reduction into this dualism or triad. Even more complex propositions, that which results in four, five or six further propositions, is still subject to this dualism or triad as a dualism of triads, a dualism of dualisms, a triad of dualisms or a triad of triads.
The same statistical inevitability of a bias being expressed due to the play out of all possibilities still relegates itself to qualitative quantities. This division of the proposition occurs through its self expression in the face of a dialectical opposition which seeks to annihilate it. This potential annihilation acts as the form of division which reforms the basic proposition by breaking it down to its base roots and rebuilding it back into a whole. For ever proposition that is broken down, a series of dualistic or triadic propositions come in is place thus relegating philosophy to a cycling and recycling of propositions. The original bias state is thus reamplified through an expanded newer and newer form until the sheer magnitude of propositions, stemming from the original propositions, shatters the original proposition and a point 0 in knowledge occurs.