Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 4:22 pm OMG! Are you going to respam all your posts and clutter this category into uselessness?

Get a blog ffs!

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2020 1:32 am Stop spamming this category you loon. Get a blog and waffle to your hearts content. Although I know why you won't as a blog does not have a guaranteed membership.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: If you disagree explain why, ad hominums don't add anything to the discussion.

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 2:32 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: If you disagree explain why, ad hominums don't add anything to the discussion.

Learn what an ad hominem is or better still learn to spell it before you throw it around.

You are spamming this and other forum categories get a blog ffs.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Attack the person directly relative to personal accusations is an ad hominum. If you disagree with the argument address it directly.

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 5:38 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Attack the person directly relative to personal accusations is an ad hominum. If you disagree with the argument address it directly.

Nope, go away and try again and whilst you're there try to learn how to spell it.

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Ad hominem, so what. ...

Your inability to respond to the argument only shows you have no foot to stand on intellectually.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:49 pm 1. All numbers are grounded in the ability to quantify a phenomenon. ...

2. This quantification begins with basic forms. ...

3. The most basic form is the line. ...

4. The line is the projection of a point towards another point. ..

5. The negation of negation, as the voiding of void, is the point projecting to a line. ...

6. This line is the beginning of quantity as form. ...

7. The line is 0=0. This 0=0, as x=x, is 1=1. ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)

8. The projection of 0, as 0=0 through the line, results in the first quantity.

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 2:23 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:49 pm 1. All numbers are grounded in the ability to quantify a phenomenon. ...

Numbers are grounded upon counting as they are the symbols that replaced the objects that we used to count the objects in the world.

These symbols act as medians, due to their symbolic nature, thus exist as phenomena in themselves.

2. This quantification begins with basic forms. ...

No, it begins with objects or things.

Objects or things exist if and only if they have form.

3. The most basic form is the line. ...

This is Geometry not Arithmetic which is about numbers and the basic form of Arithmetic is matching.

False, all counting is the quantification of forms. Forms and counting are inseperable.

4. The line is the projection of a point towards another point. ..

A line is the idealised representation of the shortest distance between two points or a straight edge and used to be displayed or created using an object.

A one directional line is the projection of a point in 1 direction.

5. The negation of negation, as the voiding of void, is the point projecting to a line. ...

Just your pet metaphysic.

Double negatives. If void is voided then being results.

6. This line is the beginning of quantity as form. ...

And again.

See above.

7. The line is 0=0. This 0=0, as x=x, is 1=1. ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)

You'll have to explain how you are using the symbols 0,1 and '=' as 0 is not equal to 1.

0 equals 1 through a medial context of x=x where both 1=1 and 0 =0 equivocate through x=x..

8. The projection of 0, as 0=0 through the line, results in the first quantity.

By 'first quantity' I presume you mean '1' and this need no '0' to 'result' as it is just a marker for one object or thing, hence the Romans and many others had no '0' for a very long time.

The mark exists by its attachment to a phenomena. The most basic phenomena is the line. The line is the most basic form of all quantifiable forms.

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 2:12 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Ad hominem, so what. ...

Well at least you've learnt something.

Your inability to respond to the argument only shows you have no foot to stand on intellectually.

I don't bother because most of the time your pet metaphysic makes you incapable of having a constructive discussion. My point in my recent responses to you is that you are now just spamming the categories with stuff you have already posted. If you think you have something to say philosophically then get a blog, form your ideas into something like a coherent philosophy and then think about self-publishing it rather than just cluttering the categories with your stream of consciousness as whilst it may be cathartic for you it's a bloody pain on the eyes. Still, lets see.