Page 1 of 1

Unified Field Theory (why there is none)

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 2:45 pm
by nothing
i. Unity is not hitherto demarcated/defined.
ii. Space and time are catastrophically decoupled by GR.
__________________________________

i.
Let the speed of light c = 1 as unity.
Let all physical phenomena be particular displacement(s) therefrom.
Unity is now demarcated/defined,
insofar as any/all particular (dis)placements (ie. physical phenomena)
implicitly/explicitly concerns c = 1 as unity.

Space and time are reciprocal aspects of motion, thus can not be de-coupled (!)
The only constituency of the universe is motion, and nothing else.
General Relativity de-couples space and time (!), thus is de-coupled from reality (!)
due to a failure of Einstein's 2nd postulate:
1. First postulate (principle of relativity)

The laws of physics take the same form in all inertial frames of reference.

X 2. Second postulate (invariance of c)

As measured in any inertial frame of reference, light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c that is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body. Or: the speed of light in free space has the same value c in all inertial frames of reference.
Light does not have an absolute "speed": it is a variable rate of induction whose "speed" is merely relative to a displaced body(s).

Universe of Motion postulates:
1. The universe is composed of one component, motion, existing in three dimensions, in discrete units, and with two reciprocal aspects, space and time.

2. The universe conforms to the relations of ordinary mathematics, its primary magnitudes are absolute, and its geometry is Projective.
Both space and time have three dimensions. For an idea as to how 3-dimensional time acts relative to a (displaced) being,
imagine three spheres: one small, one medium containing the small, and one large containing both.
The small sphere is one solar/lunar day, the medium is one solar year, the large is one great year (~25920 years).
All expressions in 3D space have reciprocal counter-parts in 3D time, thus by acknowledging this relationship
space and time can never be de-coupled as is the present-day impasse in (astro-)physics.

s/t = speed (reciprocal of energy)
t/s = energy (reciprocal of speed)
s³/t³ = gravity (not a force, but a motion: acceleration)

s³/1 = physical 3-dimensional space (per unit of time) as in every-day experience
t³/1 = metaphysical 3-dimensional time (per unit of space)
_____________________________________________________________________
Space and time can be expressed in terms of Φ as
Φ² - Φ = 1 which may implicitly/explicitly concern c = 1.
Φ = 1.618...
Φ² = 2.618... (Φ+1)
Φ³ = 4.236...

√5 is the key that couples space and time such to mutually concern c = 1.

ii.
Uniting space and time as Φ and π:
*Φ = (π+π√5)/2π {yang} as masculine line (space)
**π = 4/√Φ {yin} as feminine curve (time)
____________________________________________
*π is needed instead of integers to couple to Φ and thus describes a cyclic/rotating base of 2π (time)
**π is erroneously treated as autonomous and thus decoupled from Φ if/when approximated (as it is today).

The last point concerning π is the very reason present-day General Relativity is (and always will be) dead,
as space and time are practically decoupled from the physics of the universe: from Φ's own rib is derived π.

π is transcendental only if: not coupled to (ie. not acting in co-operation with) Φ:
the very notion of approximating π as if autonomous, using Archimedean poly- approximation, is a blunder (!)
π must be derived only by way of the circle whose diameter is √5 because Φ relies on the same root (!)
If/when de-coupling π from Φ, the same is de-coupling space and time (!) and/or curve and line: thus not unity (!)

True value of π expressed as the ratio of an integer about √Φ:
Image
AB = √5
BC = +1
D = (1+√5)/2
_______________________________________________________________________
wherein line AC (1+√5) rotated about the origin causes D (AC/2) to imply a circle
whose diameter is equal to 1, thus kissing the unit square 4 times equidistantly.
This allows a precise π to be expressed as the ratio of the integer 4 about √Φ,
thus the integer (ie. relationship between space/time) may implicitly/explicitly concern c = 1
as unity.

The present-day approximation of π has two conceptual problems:
i. It is not possible to precisely measure a curve with a line(s) (ie. polygon approximation) even if →∞, and
ii. Relating the Kepler triangle (1, √Φ, Φ) to a circle requires a circle whose diameter is √5, and not:
Image
Rather:
Image
Which allows the consolidating to be equidistantly "outside the box" indicating a transcendental axes.

The axes is simple and implicitly concerns all space-and-time (ie. displaced) phenomena:
Image
_____________________________
Concerns c = √1 as either to (-1) and/or from (+1) unity
if treating belief-based ignorance(s) as a (+) magnitude
thus knowledge negating belief as a (-) magnitude.

By designating the beg/end axes as 'to know' and 'to believe'
the identity of the two mythical Edenic trees can be recovered
such to clarify both: the universal axes, thus a solution to all forms
of human suffering as corollary:
Image
these axes can be used to "orient" such to:
ever-approach all-knowing (theist/atheist-invariant) while simultaneously
ever-receding from all belief-based ignorance(s) causing suffering/death.
These axes can thus be said to be: universally bestowed, locally employed.
The only variation is in orientation, which is a local gauge choice
according to the body concerned (along with their own particular disposition).

By applying these axes to a being with equal capacity for right/wrong,
we recover the same relationship as found in Φ as (π+π√5)/2π,
with π+π√5 being a pentagram (4 arms/legs as the axes, 5th as local gauge choice)
and 2π being any circle (again: local gauge choice) describing any 'cycle' of time,
as in: day/year/great year.

Image
____________________________
wherein:
s³/t ↔ s²/t² ↔ s/t³
speed ↔ unity ↔ energy
!under ↔ !unity! ↔ over!

No Jew/Christian/Muslim (ie. "believer") would be able to contest against such a solution
without: explicitly displaying their own internal hypocrisy(s) concerning the attainment of 'peace'.