Philosophy Now Forum

GUYS...

You meet a girl. She's lovely and smart and, you discover on the occasion of your first intimate moment with her, that she's a guy.

What do you do?


GIRLS...

You meet a guy. He's handsome and smart and, you discover on the occasion of your first intimate moment with him, that he's a girl.

What do you do?

How good is her ball tickle game? This is important information.

I have it on good authority that:

1. Men give better blowjobs than women
2. Women are better cunnilinguist than men.

What better time to find out first hand?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:08 pm I have it on good authority that:

1. Men give better blowjobs than women
2. Women are better cunnilinguist than men.

What better time to find out first hand?

Extra points if it's the same ladyboy that told you both these facts.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:09 pm Extra points if it's the same ladyboy that told you both these facts.

That would be a small sample size fallacy.

I've heard it from at least 5 different sources.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:02 pm GUYS...

You meet a girl. She's lovely and smart and, you discover on the occasion of your first intimate moment with her, that she's a guy.

What do you do?


GIRLS...

You meet a guy. He's handsome and smart and, you discover on the occasion of your first intimate moment with him, that he's a girl.

What do you do?

I would politely decline and leave the bedroom or whatever. I might even be a little miffed that s/he didn't tell me sooner, causing me to waste a lot of time but I suppose I should feel a little flattered that s/he thought me someone they like enough to want to get intimate with. I don't know. But, no. I"m not really into that sort of thing.

BTW, Henry, I would change the name of the thread, otherwise the mods might close it. I mean, they're legitimate questions and it really isn't "tranny bashing" if people discuss it honestly and in good faith.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:12 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:09 pm Extra points if it's the same ladyboy that told you both these facts.

That would be a small sample size fallacy.

I've heard it from at least 5 different sources.

I just totally read that as small fallus.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:22 pm I just totally read that as small fallus.

No fallus if post-op.

Get new glasses?

cricket bats or croquet mallets?

-Imp

So...

Flash mocks cuz he ain't got a leg to stand on.

Skep mocks cuz he's unprincipled.

Gary is honest and on the right track.

The mods, alarmed at the thread title, may delete the thread.

And finally, most importantly: Imp doesn't know the value of a baseball bat (wood, not aluminum).

henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:08 am So...

Flash mocks cuz he ain't got a leg to stand on.

Skep mocks cuz he's unprincipled.

Gary is honest and on the right track.

The mods, alarmed at the thread title, may delete the thread.

And finally, most importantly: Imp doesn't know the value of a baseball bat (wood, not aluminum).

When your principles lead you astray they may have outlived their usefulness - you should consider replacing them.

The only perspective you seem to think is "on the right track" is the one that agrees with yours.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:02 pm GUYS...

You meet a girl. She's lovely and smart and, you discover on the occasion of your first intimate moment with her, that she's a guy.

What do you do?


GIRLS...

You meet a guy. He's handsome and smart and, you discover on the occasion of your first intimate moment with him, that he's a girl.

What do you do?

Either you are assuming that all of us seek sexual partners of the opposite sex, or you don't want to hear the views of those of us who don't. Either way, that shows a lack, I think.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 7:31 am

henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:08 am So...

Flash mocks cuz he ain't got a leg to stand on.

Skep mocks cuz he's unprincipled.

Gary is honest and on the right track.

The mods, alarmed at the thread title, may delete the thread.

And finally, most importantly: Imp doesn't know the value of a baseball bat (wood, not aluminum).

When your principles lead you astray they may have outlived their usefulness - you should consider replacing them.

The only perspective you seem to think is "on the right track" is the one that agrees with yours.

My principles haven't led me astray and you don't have any.

And: Gary is on the right track, he has a measure of dignity and principle.