Philosophy Now Forum

All progressive tautologies result in a variable that represents the tautology itself.

A-->B(A-->A)-->C(A-->A-->A)-->...--> -A(A-->A-->A-->A...)

Where:

-A = (A-->B-->C-->...-->-A) = (A-->A-->A-->A-->A...)

Thus A-->-A


Looping of the variable into a tautology back into a variable as a new tautology necessitates each variable is both a string and atomic fact.

(A-->B-->C-->...-->-A)-->A1
(A1-->A2 --> A3 --> ...--> -A1) --> B1
(B1 --> B2 --> B3 -->...--> -B1) --> C1

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 3:10 amHyper Dimensional Variable Loops Leads to Atomic/String Fact Dualism

Not on my watch.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 2:42 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 3:10 amHyper Dimensional Variable Loops Leads to Atomic/String Fact Dualism

Not on my watch.

The particle/wave dualism of physics occurs in logic as well under atomic fact and factual string dualism.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:32 pm The particle/wave dualism of physics occurs in logic as well under atomic fact and factual string dualism.

The so-called wave-particle nature of electromagnetic phenomena is only a way of picturing or describing the behavior of such phenomena under different conditions. Only the naive believe those models are descriptions of actual physical objects that are particles and waves simultaneously. Do you believe that?

RCSaunders wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:33 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:32 pm The particle/wave dualism of physics occurs in logic as well under atomic fact and factual string dualism.

The so-called wave-particle nature of electromagnetic phenomena is only a way of picturing or describing the behavior of such phenomena under different conditions. Only the naive believe those models are descriptions of actual physical objects that are particles and waves simultaneously. Do you believe that?

Logic follows the same manner, it begins with atomic facts with the atomic fact being the localization of a series of progressive definitions.