Fidelity as (Ideal) Form / Form as (in)Fidelity
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:22 pm
Trying the discovered proposition:
thus has a definite relationship to/with an ideal perfect circle: the apex
and two vertices perfectly defining any three equidistant points of a related circle.
If one intuits any such equilateral triangle is thus also a circle
(whose circumference definitely lies on the vertices),
in their most ideal 'form' (ie. highest fidelity)
they ideally co-define one another:
circle can 'let be' equilateral triangle,
and equilateral triangle can 'let be' circle.
This is thus "fidelity" as ideal form: itself without innate substance
(ie. as existing, but not in/of any particular physical nature)
with the example illustrating the relationship (ie. fidelity) between:
image (ie. masculine) and likeness (ie. feminine)
as simply being a matter of line-curve particle-wave syntheses reflecting
the innate dielectric/magnetic nature of the ether acting in/as either:
a perpetuity (ie. form with fidelity) or something-less-than (ie. any infidel form).
Thus, form (ie. less than ideal) as infidelity is implied as any/all less:
manifest attempts at form(s) with resulting innate substance(s)
(ie. infidelities) as an "approach" and/or gradation from
some "ideal" form: real or imagined.
If one thus begins with a folded circle infinity, and allows the two poles of the infinity to serve as two vertices of a related equilateral triangle-circle-duo, one finds that the "third point" needed to complete the triangle is in one-of-two variable places. This definitely only-one-of-two phenomena is discovered (viz. by CKIIT) as a principle discipline of consciousness esp. as it relates to definite distinction(s) between what is true/false via if/when any one particular can not possibly be occupying one-of-two apex-variables.
https://meru.org/Posters/gen1-3.html
Graphic viz. the one-or-the-other true/false phenomena is captured in/as Genesis 1:3 and elaborated in/as Genesis 1:4
Apex:
Such a disruption/perversion of such a perfectly natural 'law' is best demonstrated by the religion of Islam wherein Muhammadan men believe themselves entitled to multiple women contrary to the fidelity of the Edenic 'state' as being comprised of one man and one woman. This infidel gradation of fidelity is "justified" by the Muhammadans according to their belief/worship of a book and a dead infidel man whose own infidel nature defines the 'state' of Islam.
This problem-example further highlights the problem-in-and-of-itself of belief-in-and-of-itself. One can always try any belief as trying the inverse of that belief (as related to the one-of-two possible 'states'):
Does it yes/no take a believer to believe:
perpetual war leads to peace? (yes)
Infidelity is fidelity? (yes)
Evil is good? (yes)
Satan is god? (yes)
etc.
and it is always 'yes' re: "the opposite of whatever is manifestly true".
viz. the 2/3-completed equilateral triangle requiring a only-one-of-two apex is a geometric representation of the truth-by-way-of-negation method derived by CKIIT that appears to be as infallible as the being themselves using it. It is employed by the theorem to derive the conclusions it purports: regardless of how controversial/upsetting they may be.
Also recently found:
Pigs whine and squeal. <-* fascists
Sheep tend to flock. <-* unconscious/ignorant
Goats climb mountains. <-* conscious/attentive
To frame: an ideal perfect equilateral triangle is three equal points/lines/angles,What infidelity is to: less-than-ideal form-with-substance,
fidelity is to: ideal form-without-substance.
thus has a definite relationship to/with an ideal perfect circle: the apex
and two vertices perfectly defining any three equidistant points of a related circle.
If one intuits any such equilateral triangle is thus also a circle
(whose circumference definitely lies on the vertices),
in their most ideal 'form' (ie. highest fidelity)
they ideally co-define one another:
circle can 'let be' equilateral triangle,
and equilateral triangle can 'let be' circle.
This is thus "fidelity" as ideal form: itself without innate substance
(ie. as existing, but not in/of any particular physical nature)
with the example illustrating the relationship (ie. fidelity) between:
image (ie. masculine) and likeness (ie. feminine)
as simply being a matter of line-curve particle-wave syntheses reflecting
the innate dielectric/magnetic nature of the ether acting in/as either:
a perpetuity (ie. form with fidelity) or something-less-than (ie. any infidel form).
Thus, form (ie. less than ideal) as infidelity is implied as any/all less:
manifest attempts at form(s) with resulting innate substance(s)
(ie. infidelities) as an "approach" and/or gradation from
some "ideal" form: real or imagined.
If one thus begins with a folded circle infinity, and allows the two poles of the infinity to serve as two vertices of a related equilateral triangle-circle-duo, one finds that the "third point" needed to complete the triangle is in one-of-two variable places. This definitely only-one-of-two phenomena is discovered (viz. by CKIIT) as a principle discipline of consciousness esp. as it relates to definite distinction(s) between what is true/false via if/when any one particular can not possibly be occupying one-of-two apex-variables.
https://meru.org/Posters/gen1-3.html
Graphic viz. the one-or-the-other true/false phenomena is captured in/as Genesis 1:3 and elaborated in/as Genesis 1:4
Genesis 1:4 describes a fidelity-to-infidelity form(s): the first reference to light is distinctly preceded by (essence of) whereas the second is lacking, indicating that the resulting 'light' that is being distinguished from the darkness is not essence of light, but rather as distinct from essence of light: just plain light. Genesis 1:3 can thus be "plotted" on/as an equilateral triangle wherein image/likeness are the vertices and a shared 'fidelity' apex and Elohim is an ideal shared will relationship:GENESIS 1:4 (my own translation finding the rest are not good)
וירא אלהים את האור כי טוב ויבדל אלהים בין האור ובין החשך
And beholding (elohim) the (essence of) light (that it was good), so distinguished (elohim) the light (from the darkness).
Apex:
Image:And saying (elohim)
Likeness:'Let light be,'
of which the synthesis reduces into any manner of forms with any degree(s) of like fidelity flanking an apex from either side:and light was.
and the third "point" of any such dichotomy being a collapse of the only-one-of-two-possible 'state': approaching either fidelity or infidelity with respect to any form. It follows that any/all so-called "Abrahamic" religions that do not actively/consciously idealize the Edenic 'state' proportions of 1:1 man/woman are inherently and intrinsically infidel.El - oh - im
I am that I am
Male(+) and Female(-)
dielectricity and magnetism
Image and likeness
Adam and Eve
Bestowal and Reception
Sowing and Reaping
Particle and Wave
etc.
___________________________
wherein:
fidelity to 1:1 proportionality destroys particular infidel form(s), and
infidelity to 1:1 proportionality (ie. 1:2, 1:4, 1:9 etc.) creates particular infidel form(s)
Such a disruption/perversion of such a perfectly natural 'law' is best demonstrated by the religion of Islam wherein Muhammadan men believe themselves entitled to multiple women contrary to the fidelity of the Edenic 'state' as being comprised of one man and one woman. This infidel gradation of fidelity is "justified" by the Muhammadans according to their belief/worship of a book and a dead infidel man whose own infidel nature defines the 'state' of Islam.
This problem-example further highlights the problem-in-and-of-itself of belief-in-and-of-itself. One can always try any belief as trying the inverse of that belief (as related to the one-of-two possible 'states'):
And very easy trial(s) after belief enters the equation:Islam is a religion of (+) peace. <-* Belief-based claim as one particulate
Is the inverse (+ -> -) true? What is the inverse of peace? <-* vertices
Islam is a religion of (-) perpetual war. <-*Inverse of belief-based claim as another particulate
Which particulate more closely reflects the reality?
Islam is a religion of peace. <-* Belief-based claim as one particulate
Islam is a religion of perpetual war. <-*Inverse of belief-based claim as another particulate
Does it yes/no take a believer to believe:
perpetual war leads to peace? (yes)
Infidelity is fidelity? (yes)
Evil is good? (yes)
Satan is god? (yes)
etc.
and it is always 'yes' re: "the opposite of whatever is manifestly true".
viz. the 2/3-completed equilateral triangle requiring a only-one-of-two apex is a geometric representation of the truth-by-way-of-negation method derived by CKIIT that appears to be as infallible as the being themselves using it. It is employed by the theorem to derive the conclusions it purports: regardless of how controversial/upsetting they may be.
Also recently found:
Pigs whine and squeal. <-* fascists
Sheep tend to flock. <-* unconscious/ignorant
Goats climb mountains. <-* conscious/attentive