Free Will as a "Radiant Void"
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:39 pm
Free will is meta-relativistic by nature, as meta relativity is context through context as context.
Free will is a context of definition intrinsically empty in itself, as one definition leads to another then another...etc.
Thus when observing "free will", in any symbolic manner whether through a defined set of words or experiences (which act as "symbols" through the memory), we are left with a continual circularity:
a) "Free will is 'x' because 'x' is free will" or
b) a simple loop of a memory where we are left within an indefinite state of pure self-expression is repeated and contains all other memories within it as a sort of "apex" or singular moment where "truth is revealed".
c) but considering the nature of all definitions in language exist as symbols which are connected to an inherent experience (ie; counting a set of objects ingrains the symbols of arithmetic within us) points A and B are simultaneous.
It is this inherent "looping" within in the expression of free will that necessitates it as assumed strictly both as a form, but simultaneously because its inherent "emptiness" necessitates it instrinsically tied within the empty nature of "assumption itself" considering "emptiness" is an ever present medium that is inexpressible except through an observation of relations.
It is the inherent emptiness of assumption, and the looping nature of free will inherent within its very nature of trying to define it, which necessiates free will expressed as a process of contextualizing reality through the natural movement of "assuming". This contextualization, where we assume a phenomenon and repeat it as an inherent loop with this context further looping itself through further phenomenon, necessitates free will as the formation of context.
This formation of context, where "synthesis" of experiences and symbols, is recipiprocally a symbol in and of itself through the loop. Thus the nature of looping is a formation of perspective where we filter how we assume through the inherent looping of preassumed values that act as a lens which gives inherent perspective. The looping of an experience of "joy" or a memorized methodology of "analysis" acts as a means in which we contain all potential assumptions within a given context...we interpret our assumptions (ie give them definition) in accords with the inherent loops we preassumed.
In these respects perspective is merely a self maintained cycle of assumptions grounded in its own self-referencing in the midst of "voidness" as a means to give form to any potential experiences whether they be a future event or the reinterpretation of some dark facet of the unconsciousness or a forgotten memory.
In simpler terms we form perspective to contain our assumptions, with this perspective acting as a "way".
This inherently empty nature of the unconsciousness, reflects the inherently empty nature of the "assuming" with which we naturally flow in the course of everyday life as well as our private reflections and meditations. Assumption is thus grounded in unconsciousness, but precisely is individualistic potential because of this same nature. All assumptions, as intrinsically empty, are intrinsically potential forms as these assumptions act as projections of the self in how we interpret the world. Our definitions of the world, as grounded within the individual's awareness, are merely projections of our own awareness; hence is grounded in our own identity thus acting as a self-judgement through a self-referentiality.
It is these forms, which project from and back into the nature of the "void" of assumption that expresses a contradiction grounded within the psyche of man: A luminous void where the continual expansion and contraction of forms/archetypes/perspectives as methods/etc. necessitate an intrinsic radiance to the empty of the psyche.
This "radiance", where all phenomenon as "given definition" exist intuitively under some form of "light" considering we observe definition through an inherent "light" unfrt the senses or a sense of touch, smell or sound that gives light to a "form" within the psyche. It is this awareness of definition that inherently necessitates an expression of "being". Radiance is the emission of being from inherent "nothingness", as that which radiates "emits" itself thus is grounded in a projective nature subject to underlying spatial axioms.
In these respects, under these terms, reason exists fundamentally as a "light" as its grounding in the relation of parts (whether they be abstract or physical) as ratios, from which all rationality stems, radiates intrinsics forms through an inherent expansion and contraction from the "void" that inherently lies at the core of individual psyche yet underlies the empirical nature of reality as observed with physics experiments in which parts "come and go" out of a vacuum.
This vacuum state is further reflected within the nature of perspective as constituting a "sphere" of reasoning in which we maintian not just personal relationships but inherently a means of influence under the cycle of our repeated actions as habits. This state of emptiness, within the assumptive nature of man, as constituting a dynamically changing circle reflects itself within the base nature of the particles in which we are formed as they, being "forms" of a sphere, are 99.99999.... empty.
It is this recursion of contexts within context, as they expand and contract in accords to our perceptions inherent ability to penetrate their inherently passive states, that necessitates the void of assumption is an underlying universal medium of "nothingness" that connects reality through an entangled set of loops...all of which are intrinsically empty yet ever present in infinite variation. This entanglement itself, fundamentally chaotic due to its infinite directionality, is but a loop itself.
Free will is thus a loop, through a loop, as the expression of a cycle of "being" that effectively contains "voidness" through its inherently empty nature.
Free will is a context of definition intrinsically empty in itself, as one definition leads to another then another...etc.
Thus when observing "free will", in any symbolic manner whether through a defined set of words or experiences (which act as "symbols" through the memory), we are left with a continual circularity:
a) "Free will is 'x' because 'x' is free will" or
b) a simple loop of a memory where we are left within an indefinite state of pure self-expression is repeated and contains all other memories within it as a sort of "apex" or singular moment where "truth is revealed".
c) but considering the nature of all definitions in language exist as symbols which are connected to an inherent experience (ie; counting a set of objects ingrains the symbols of arithmetic within us) points A and B are simultaneous.
It is this inherent "looping" within in the expression of free will that necessitates it as assumed strictly both as a form, but simultaneously because its inherent "emptiness" necessitates it instrinsically tied within the empty nature of "assumption itself" considering "emptiness" is an ever present medium that is inexpressible except through an observation of relations.
It is the inherent emptiness of assumption, and the looping nature of free will inherent within its very nature of trying to define it, which necessiates free will expressed as a process of contextualizing reality through the natural movement of "assuming". This contextualization, where we assume a phenomenon and repeat it as an inherent loop with this context further looping itself through further phenomenon, necessitates free will as the formation of context.
This formation of context, where "synthesis" of experiences and symbols, is recipiprocally a symbol in and of itself through the loop. Thus the nature of looping is a formation of perspective where we filter how we assume through the inherent looping of preassumed values that act as a lens which gives inherent perspective. The looping of an experience of "joy" or a memorized methodology of "analysis" acts as a means in which we contain all potential assumptions within a given context...we interpret our assumptions (ie give them definition) in accords with the inherent loops we preassumed.
In these respects perspective is merely a self maintained cycle of assumptions grounded in its own self-referencing in the midst of "voidness" as a means to give form to any potential experiences whether they be a future event or the reinterpretation of some dark facet of the unconsciousness or a forgotten memory.
In simpler terms we form perspective to contain our assumptions, with this perspective acting as a "way".
This inherently empty nature of the unconsciousness, reflects the inherently empty nature of the "assuming" with which we naturally flow in the course of everyday life as well as our private reflections and meditations. Assumption is thus grounded in unconsciousness, but precisely is individualistic potential because of this same nature. All assumptions, as intrinsically empty, are intrinsically potential forms as these assumptions act as projections of the self in how we interpret the world. Our definitions of the world, as grounded within the individual's awareness, are merely projections of our own awareness; hence is grounded in our own identity thus acting as a self-judgement through a self-referentiality.
It is these forms, which project from and back into the nature of the "void" of assumption that expresses a contradiction grounded within the psyche of man: A luminous void where the continual expansion and contraction of forms/archetypes/perspectives as methods/etc. necessitate an intrinsic radiance to the empty of the psyche.
This "radiance", where all phenomenon as "given definition" exist intuitively under some form of "light" considering we observe definition through an inherent "light" unfrt the senses or a sense of touch, smell or sound that gives light to a "form" within the psyche. It is this awareness of definition that inherently necessitates an expression of "being". Radiance is the emission of being from inherent "nothingness", as that which radiates "emits" itself thus is grounded in a projective nature subject to underlying spatial axioms.
In these respects, under these terms, reason exists fundamentally as a "light" as its grounding in the relation of parts (whether they be abstract or physical) as ratios, from which all rationality stems, radiates intrinsics forms through an inherent expansion and contraction from the "void" that inherently lies at the core of individual psyche yet underlies the empirical nature of reality as observed with physics experiments in which parts "come and go" out of a vacuum.
This vacuum state is further reflected within the nature of perspective as constituting a "sphere" of reasoning in which we maintian not just personal relationships but inherently a means of influence under the cycle of our repeated actions as habits. This state of emptiness, within the assumptive nature of man, as constituting a dynamically changing circle reflects itself within the base nature of the particles in which we are formed as they, being "forms" of a sphere, are 99.99999.... empty.
It is this recursion of contexts within context, as they expand and contract in accords to our perceptions inherent ability to penetrate their inherently passive states, that necessitates the void of assumption is an underlying universal medium of "nothingness" that connects reality through an entangled set of loops...all of which are intrinsically empty yet ever present in infinite variation. This entanglement itself, fundamentally chaotic due to its infinite directionality, is but a loop itself.
Free will is thus a loop, through a loop, as the expression of a cycle of "being" that effectively contains "voidness" through its inherently empty nature.