We Know God Exists Because of the Eyes of Men and Women
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:51 pm
GOD IS THE OPPOSITION TO NOTHINGNESS (L: OPPOSITES) BY MEDIATION OF BEING.
This definition creates the image of God being a sphere, in the centre of which nothing (L: he) is emprisoned. And the divine sphere is continuously acting the divine work through which it detains eternally nothing to be in it, from which through exuberance of its goodness it calls into being the thing which is as if it (the thing which is as if it] L: As he) existed around the centre. If (L: Either) it attracts it (L: is attracted) to being, the sphere remains, if to potential being, it goes back to nothing.
We Know God Exists Because of the Eyes of Men and Women as the eye is an embodiment of the inherent nature of cycles which permeate the various facets of empirical external being as well as the internal abstract rational and intuitive degrees in which man reflects and operates.
This knowing is the manner of assumption as a means, where we assume all phenomenon through an inherent loop between the subject and object, but also with assumption itself determined by the inherent patterns we filter information through....the most universal of these patterns (or perpsectives) is the circle as evidence by the nature of assumption assuming itself, void...voiding itself into pure "being".
This "void", the grounding of all "assumption" as assumptions are fundamentally "void" reflects:
GOD IS DARKNESS LEFT BEHIND IN THE SOUL AFTER ALL LIGHT.
The forms of things (L: which are) at the soul which reveal what is in her, because of that it is said of her (that is said of her] L: God) that she is somehow all, (somehow all] L: the soul), itself illuminates the soul (L: something of the soul). But after the detachment of all those (all those] L: the communion of) forms, the divinity is contemplated. Through abnegation and removal (. Through abnegation and removal] L: , through abnegation and removal. The removal) of all forms of things von herself, she turns herself beyond herself and wants to see the first cause. And the intellect of the soul is overshadowed, because it is not apt for that uncreated light. Therefore, when it turns towards itself, it says: This is darkness for me (Therefore ... me] L: om.).
This recursion of the basic "cycle" necessitates a variation of "one" through "many" fundamentally assumed within the nature of the eye as being an embodiment of these cycles.
The eye is as a sphere effectively "captures" change and inverts it into a static memory within the mind or heart. It takes the constant flow of reality and inverts it in a static form...an image through which we assume and integrate into how we percieve the world.
This perception, as the dynamic way in which we assume reality, in turn filters how we assume reality. We assume basic "self-evident truth" (assumed assumptions) and process reality through the filter of this lens. We percieve through the axioms we embody with this embodiment acting as a system of values that determining how we assume. This cycling, is reflected further within the cycles of nature as well as the cycles of reasoning and intuition inherent within man thus necessitating "one cycle" non moving and static reflected in how we "absolutize" truth through the conversion of the dynamic into static memories or "axioms". This Cycle as Universal observes:
GOD IS AN INFINITE SPHERE WHOSE
CENTRE IS EVERYWHERE AND HIS CIRCUMFERENCE (L: INDEED) NOWHERE
This definition is given as a way of imagining that the continuum (L: centre) is the very first cause in its own life. Namely the end (L: circle) of its extension lies above the ‘where’, terminating outside. Therefore, its centre is everywhere, and has no common dimension. Asked for the circumference of its sphere, he states that it is elevated into infinity, as what is without dimension, was like the creator, is (L: also) the beginning and so (L: its) the end is nowhere. From which the proposition is clear.
The eye observes the basic form of "the circle", reflected within the cycles of both external empirical nature and the internal intellectual and intuitive nature of man, with this circle containing "Nothingness" or "Void" in its center. This void, the "pupil", acts much in the same manner as "void"...it inverts one thing (as steady flow of information through light waves).
The encapsulation of the formless (potential) is represented within the nature of the void being encapsulated through a sphere through its own self opposition negating itself. Where this inherent void, reflected from an abstraction into an empirical reality within the eye of man, negates itself into form much in the same manner the pupil negates the dynamic formless light waves into static forms interpreted within the cycles of man's natural reason and intuition.
The Book of the 24 Philosophers.
https://markusvinzent.blogspot.com/2015 ... of-24.html
This definition creates the image of God being a sphere, in the centre of which nothing (L: he) is emprisoned. And the divine sphere is continuously acting the divine work through which it detains eternally nothing to be in it, from which through exuberance of its goodness it calls into being the thing which is as if it (the thing which is as if it] L: As he) existed around the centre. If (L: Either) it attracts it (L: is attracted) to being, the sphere remains, if to potential being, it goes back to nothing.
We Know God Exists Because of the Eyes of Men and Women as the eye is an embodiment of the inherent nature of cycles which permeate the various facets of empirical external being as well as the internal abstract rational and intuitive degrees in which man reflects and operates.
This knowing is the manner of assumption as a means, where we assume all phenomenon through an inherent loop between the subject and object, but also with assumption itself determined by the inherent patterns we filter information through....the most universal of these patterns (or perpsectives) is the circle as evidence by the nature of assumption assuming itself, void...voiding itself into pure "being".
This "void", the grounding of all "assumption" as assumptions are fundamentally "void" reflects:
GOD IS DARKNESS LEFT BEHIND IN THE SOUL AFTER ALL LIGHT.
The forms of things (L: which are) at the soul which reveal what is in her, because of that it is said of her (that is said of her] L: God) that she is somehow all, (somehow all] L: the soul), itself illuminates the soul (L: something of the soul). But after the detachment of all those (all those] L: the communion of) forms, the divinity is contemplated. Through abnegation and removal (. Through abnegation and removal] L: , through abnegation and removal. The removal) of all forms of things von herself, she turns herself beyond herself and wants to see the first cause. And the intellect of the soul is overshadowed, because it is not apt for that uncreated light. Therefore, when it turns towards itself, it says: This is darkness for me (Therefore ... me] L: om.).
This recursion of the basic "cycle" necessitates a variation of "one" through "many" fundamentally assumed within the nature of the eye as being an embodiment of these cycles.
The eye is as a sphere effectively "captures" change and inverts it into a static memory within the mind or heart. It takes the constant flow of reality and inverts it in a static form...an image through which we assume and integrate into how we percieve the world.
This perception, as the dynamic way in which we assume reality, in turn filters how we assume reality. We assume basic "self-evident truth" (assumed assumptions) and process reality through the filter of this lens. We percieve through the axioms we embody with this embodiment acting as a system of values that determining how we assume. This cycling, is reflected further within the cycles of nature as well as the cycles of reasoning and intuition inherent within man thus necessitating "one cycle" non moving and static reflected in how we "absolutize" truth through the conversion of the dynamic into static memories or "axioms". This Cycle as Universal observes:
GOD IS AN INFINITE SPHERE WHOSE
CENTRE IS EVERYWHERE AND HIS CIRCUMFERENCE (L: INDEED) NOWHERE
This definition is given as a way of imagining that the continuum (L: centre) is the very first cause in its own life. Namely the end (L: circle) of its extension lies above the ‘where’, terminating outside. Therefore, its centre is everywhere, and has no common dimension. Asked for the circumference of its sphere, he states that it is elevated into infinity, as what is without dimension, was like the creator, is (L: also) the beginning and so (L: its) the end is nowhere. From which the proposition is clear.
The eye observes the basic form of "the circle", reflected within the cycles of both external empirical nature and the internal intellectual and intuitive nature of man, with this circle containing "Nothingness" or "Void" in its center. This void, the "pupil", acts much in the same manner as "void"...it inverts one thing (as steady flow of information through light waves).
The encapsulation of the formless (potential) is represented within the nature of the void being encapsulated through a sphere through its own self opposition negating itself. Where this inherent void, reflected from an abstraction into an empirical reality within the eye of man, negates itself into form much in the same manner the pupil negates the dynamic formless light waves into static forms interpreted within the cycles of man's natural reason and intuition.
The Book of the 24 Philosophers.
https://markusvinzent.blogspot.com/2015 ... of-24.html