The Paradox of Technology
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 10:08 pm
We measure reality to develop machines.
These machines in turn measure for us, which in turn necessitates we do not have to measure as much.
This measurement is the quantification and qualification of reality through math and language.
In turn we either do not measure reality in enough of a manner when we reach a point that machines measure it for us....thus eventually creating themselves. We in turn may measure reality in a different manner where the machines do "the work".
Eventually the measurements used to create the machines, we do not understand, but the machines will. The math and language use to describe them will become foreign to us both because we had no need to understand it after a certain point "and" they developed their own for there own purposes that we are also unaware of.
The problem occurs in that in developing tools, we eventually will become separated from them as no common knowledge will bind the two.
However a deeper paradox occurs. All math is grounded in the counting of forms, with the most basic of forms being a simple dot. There are however an infinite number of ways to quantify and qualify the dot as the dot is the origin of both quantifying and qualifying reality.
So effectively the machines can only represent, at a complex level a continual progressive variation of material as there foundations are grounded in the individuation of forms, ie calculation.
So machines as progressive, by default are self voiding as the current model, represented by a physical state of existence is voided by its future model that will negate itself as well.
This continual self negation as the repeated transmutation of one form into another by default necessitates an inherent physical chaos that is self negating by nature.
These machines in turn measure for us, which in turn necessitates we do not have to measure as much.
This measurement is the quantification and qualification of reality through math and language.
In turn we either do not measure reality in enough of a manner when we reach a point that machines measure it for us....thus eventually creating themselves. We in turn may measure reality in a different manner where the machines do "the work".
Eventually the measurements used to create the machines, we do not understand, but the machines will. The math and language use to describe them will become foreign to us both because we had no need to understand it after a certain point "and" they developed their own for there own purposes that we are also unaware of.
The problem occurs in that in developing tools, we eventually will become separated from them as no common knowledge will bind the two.
However a deeper paradox occurs. All math is grounded in the counting of forms, with the most basic of forms being a simple dot. There are however an infinite number of ways to quantify and qualify the dot as the dot is the origin of both quantifying and qualifying reality.
So effectively the machines can only represent, at a complex level a continual progressive variation of material as there foundations are grounded in the individuation of forms, ie calculation.
So machines as progressive, by default are self voiding as the current model, represented by a physical state of existence is voided by its future model that will negate itself as well.
This continual self negation as the repeated transmutation of one form into another by default necessitates an inherent physical chaos that is self negating by nature.