Page 1 of 2
Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 3:15 pm
by Philosophy Now
Each answer below receives a book. Apologies to the many entrants not included. Thanks to Finn Janning for suggesting this month’s question.
https://philosophynow.org/issues/131/Is_Philosophy_Still_The_Friend_Of_Wisdom
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 3:30 pm
by -1-
Philosophy is the love of wisdom, by conventional wisdom and by philosophical preference.
Can a love be a friend? My lover is my best friend, but she ain't no philosophy, and I ain't no wiser for her love.
Okay, where is my book.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:45 am
by Dubious
Maybe we'd be wiser if we dispensed with the idea...if we worked our way up to it instead of thinking we already know what it is.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:39 am
by Logik
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:45 am
Maybe we'd be wiser if we dispensed with the idea...if we worked our way up to it instead of thinking we already know what it is.
This pretty much sums up the issue.
Philosophy is diluted by the unwise who call themselves philosophers. And excommunication from the fraternity for the decidedly unwise doesn't seem to be a thing...
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:42 am
by Logik
-1- wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2019 3:30 pm
Can a love be a friend? My lover is my best friend, but she ain't no philosophy, and
I ain't no wiser for her love.
My lover is my best friend. She ain't no philosophy, but I am much wiser for her love.
Perhaps you've compromised?
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:44 am
by -1-
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:45 am
Maybe we'd be wiser if we dispensed with the idea...if we worked our way up to it instead of thinking we already know what it is.
That's a good idea. Why don't you start.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:25 pm
by Dubious
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:44 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:45 am
Maybe we'd be wiser if we dispensed with the idea...if we worked our way up to it instead of thinking we already know what it is.
That's a good idea. Why don't you start.
I'm working at it! Should I inform you of any breakthroughs?
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:29 pm
by -1-
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:25 pm
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:44 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:45 am
Maybe we'd be wiser if we dispensed with the idea...if we worked our way up to it instead of thinking we already know what it is.
That's a good idea. Why don't you start.
I'm working at it! Should I inform you of any breakthroughs?
I thought you wanted to gradually work up to it, not with a thought that we already know what it is. A breakthrough may mean just that. Although a breaktrhough may also, alternatively, mean a giant step for a man, and a giant leap for mankind, but not actually to arrive at the goal of enquiry.
I suggest we take baby-steps. But don't let me stop you from making leaps-and-bounds. Suit yourself.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:40 pm
by Dubious
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:29 pm
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:25 pm
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:44 am
That's a good idea. Why don't you start.
I'm working at it! Should I inform you of any breakthroughs?
I thought you wanted to gradually work up to it, not with a thought that we already know what it is.
That's what is meant by "I'm working at it!"! Breakthroughs are not guaranteed to follow...but in case there is one, I merely asked should I inform you of it? One thing I discovered about wisdom. It begins in simplicity.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:45 pm
by -1-
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:40 pm
Breakthroughs are not guaranteed to follow...but in case there is one, I merely asked should I inform you of it? One thing I discovered about wisdom. It begins in simplicity.
And wisdom that begins in simplicity, continues to become complexity.
Your turn.
Sorry, I did not answer your direct question: should you inform me or else not inform me of a breakthrough? My answer is: I leave that decision up to you. Do as you please. Don't let me influence your will with my caprice.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:59 pm
by Dubious
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:45 pm
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:40 pm
Breakthroughs are not guaranteed to follow...but in case there is one, I merely asked should I inform you of it? One thing I discovered about wisdom. It begins in simplicity.
And wisdom that begins in simplicity, continues to become complexity.
Your turn.
Sorry, I did not answer your direct question: should you inform me or else not inform me of a breakthrough? My answer is: I leave that decision up to you. Do as you please. Don't let me influence your will with my caprice.
...as I said, "begins in simplicity". What does the word 'begin' mean to you.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:34 pm
by -1-
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:59 pm
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:45 pm
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:40 pm
Breakthroughs are not guaranteed to follow...but in case there is one, I merely asked should I inform you of it? One thing I discovered about wisdom. It begins in simplicity.
And wisdom that begins in simplicity, continues to become complexity.
Your turn.
Sorry, I did not answer your direct question: should you inform me or else not inform me of a breakthrough? My answer is: I leave that decision up to you. Do as you please. Don't let me influence your will with my caprice.
...as I said, "begins in simplicity". What does the word 'begin' mean to you.
I would say the same as it means to you. If it's different in meaning to the two of us, we're in trouble.
My view is not to start with definitions; if anything, then end with definitions. Logical positivism was a failure, proven by Wittgenstein. I am not going to challenge him by going against his advice.
I suggest (but not force upon you) that we don't dissect the meanings of ordinary words with well-distributed meanings. I know it's a bit of a downer to be negative sounding right from the start. I'll try to make up to you for this later if I can.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:19 pm
by Dubious
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:34 pm
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:59 pm
-1- wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:45 pm
And wisdom that begins in simplicity, continues to become complexity.
Your turn.
Sorry, I did not answer your direct question: should you inform me or else not inform me of a breakthrough? My answer is: I leave that decision up to you. Do as you please. Don't let me influence your will with my caprice.
...as I said, "begins in simplicity". What does the word 'begin' mean to you.
I would say the same as it means to you. If it's different in meaning to the two of us, we're in trouble.
My view is not to start with definitions; if anything, then end with definitions. Logical positivism was a failure, proven by Wittgenstein. I am not going to challenge him by going against his advice.
I suggest (but not force upon you) that we don't dissect the meanings of ordinary words with well-distributed meanings. I know it's a bit of a downer to be negative sounding right from the start. I'll try to make up to you for this later if I can.
Nothing to do with Logical positivism or Wittgenstein or any philosophy but simply with an organic understanding of reality as if one were grubbing for worms in the topsoil. That's my view and yours is yours. Nothing more to discuss.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 3:28 am
by -1-
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:19 pmNothing more to discuss.
Thank you.
Re: Is Philosophy Still The Friend Of Wisdom?
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 4:04 am
by Walker
-1- wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 3:28 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:19 pmNothing more to discuss.
Thank you.
Shirley, there's always more.
(Just teasing ... one last time.)