Categories and Little Boxes
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:44 am
Categories and Little Boxes
There is a tendency to put everything into discrete boxes when, in reality, there is an overlap of even melding of all the assumed categories.
Thus, we have a view of ‘law and order’ or politics, social-norms, culture, and ethics, as being separate. Especially as between the public and private, or politics and personal.
As may already have been said, but is worth repeating.
A society or body of people in a real or notional state of chaos, is raised to the level of civilized order by what will almost certainly be centralised authority based law. A divine basis lends weight to this.
At this point considerations of social-norms and ethics, naturally arise. And if the central authority assumes this function, then what in ethical terms is an authoritarian society is created.
But if that ‘authority’ allows or promotes norms and ethics that relate to group, or individual relationships, for their own sake, then that authority is diluted or dispersed.
Where the individual is seen as of value in himself, and not simply as a cog in the body-politic, then what is described as personal freedom and equality, becomes a definition of society, as contrasting with authority and mere law and order. But the nature of that society must be defined. For it can presumably serve only two functions, individuals aloof from each other, or individuals and communities in a positive relationship with each other and the whole.
This society and ethics in the whole, forms itself into a three-sided pyramid. Chaos at one apex. And opposed to that three forms of stable society, set apart from each other by elementary values relating to the individual and groups, such as freedom, duty, anomie.
The manifest problem with present day politics-ethics is that it is one-dimensional, in ways that are in fact contradictory. Nor has it yet decided what kind of society we have or assume. An EU, or the world, is not a universal love-in, and treating it as one society of individuals will almost certainly have a disastrous authoritarian outcome.
There is a tendency to put everything into discrete boxes when, in reality, there is an overlap of even melding of all the assumed categories.
Thus, we have a view of ‘law and order’ or politics, social-norms, culture, and ethics, as being separate. Especially as between the public and private, or politics and personal.
As may already have been said, but is worth repeating.
A society or body of people in a real or notional state of chaos, is raised to the level of civilized order by what will almost certainly be centralised authority based law. A divine basis lends weight to this.
At this point considerations of social-norms and ethics, naturally arise. And if the central authority assumes this function, then what in ethical terms is an authoritarian society is created.
But if that ‘authority’ allows or promotes norms and ethics that relate to group, or individual relationships, for their own sake, then that authority is diluted or dispersed.
Where the individual is seen as of value in himself, and not simply as a cog in the body-politic, then what is described as personal freedom and equality, becomes a definition of society, as contrasting with authority and mere law and order. But the nature of that society must be defined. For it can presumably serve only two functions, individuals aloof from each other, or individuals and communities in a positive relationship with each other and the whole.
This society and ethics in the whole, forms itself into a three-sided pyramid. Chaos at one apex. And opposed to that three forms of stable society, set apart from each other by elementary values relating to the individual and groups, such as freedom, duty, anomie.
The manifest problem with present day politics-ethics is that it is one-dimensional, in ways that are in fact contradictory. Nor has it yet decided what kind of society we have or assume. An EU, or the world, is not a universal love-in, and treating it as one society of individuals will almost certainly have a disastrous authoritarian outcome.