Page 1 of 2

Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:40 pm
by Eodnhoj7
Monadic Numbers

1) All numbers exist through continuums. 1 exists through 2,3,4..., with each number respectively existing through further numbers as a continuum of continuum.

A. This continuous nature of number necessitates not just a number line, but effectively the number as having a directional property.

Example:

1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5....

This nature of all numbers as progressive in nature as defined by thier directional qualities observes all numbers as linear directed movement.

B. The continuous nature of number observes and inherent circulatory nature through the number line where all number cycle to form the number line as progressive oscillation.

Example:

(1 -> 1) -> 2

(1 <- 2) -> 3

(2 -> 2) -> 4

...

The nature of number as 1 directed through itself to maintain itself as 1 through 2, with 2 as an extension of 1 directed towards itself as 4 and 2 directed back to 1 as 3, observes that 1 maintains itself as absolute while progressing through a continuum which observes the same qualities.

C. All numbers, through 1 as extensions of 1, are points of oscillation where this point of oscillation observes the number directed through itself as itself through an approximate number which this approximate number being 1 observed through variations of one. These variations occur as 1 directed mirroring 0 as absent of structure. 1 mirroring 0, with 0 as void of meaning, observes 1 replicating this formless nature through multiple variations with 0 as void being a point of inversion between unity and multiple units.

1 exists as a point of origin existing through itself as itself.

All numbers as an origin point(s) through point(s) as points(s) observe all monastic numbers as infinite Continuums of numbers.



2) All numbers exist through continuums as continuous functions with the number line as a continuum observing all functions as continuums.

a. 1= 1+1-1, 1+2-2, 1+3-3, 1+4-4, 1+5-5...
b. 1= 2-1, 3-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-5, 7-6...
c. 1= 1*1/1, 1*2/2, 1*3/3, 1*4/4, 1*5/5...
d. 1= 1^1/1, 1^2/2, 1^3/3, 1^4/4, 1^5/5...
f. 1= 2root1, 2root2/2, 2root3/3, 2root4/4...

With infinite variation all showing all number exists as continuums through there inherent functions. While the numbers progressively vary within the continuum, the functions maintain themselves as constants as well as all number being extensions of one.

The number as inseparable from the function, as well as all number existing as an extension of one while being one continuum in itself (ex: 2 -> 4 -> 6...), observes 1 as a continuous function. All numbers are absolute as all numbers are continuums.

3. The number as composed of continuums, with these continuums existing through arithmetic functions as continuums, observes not just the number as a continuum but the function as a continuum as well where the number as form cannot be seperated from it as a function.

4. All numbers are inseperable from all functions. Hence +1 is inseperable from addition, multiplication and powers. -1 is inseperable from subtraction, division and root. One, as point 2 observes, is a continuous function as the standard arithmetic functions are continuous through one.

These arithmetic functions, as inseparable from all numbers through the 1, in themselves oscillate to form eachother in a similar manner to the number line.

Addition oscillate through itself as itself while manifesting multiplication as "the addition of addition".

Multiplication follows the same form and function where it maintains both addition and multiplication manifesting powers as the multiplication of multiplication.

Powers maintains itself as itself through addition and multiplication in turn acts a foundation for addition and multiplication.

Addition, multiplication and powers oscillate through eachother as eachother where 1 exists as an approximation of the other.

Negative functions (subtraction, division and root) follow this same oscillatory pattern.

5. All numbers as form/functions, must exist through further numbers as form/functions, hence all number inherently are directed through themselves as themselves where any replication is strictly an extension of the original mirror "numbers" as a replication of them. The number and the structural extension of that number through further numbers observe all numbers as mirroring as fundamentally oscillcations, progressing to further oscillations as an oscillation.

6. example:

1⊙= the number of oscillation of (2⊙,3⊙)
⧂ = The oscillation of the numbers into further oscillations.

1⊙(2⊙,3⊙) ⧂ (1⊙,2⊙,3⊙,4⊙,5⊙,6⊙,8⊙,9⊙,27⊙)

All numbers as a directive nature observes the directional qualities of the numbers forming new numbers under certain circumstances.
a. 2+3= 5
b. 3+2= 5
c. 2*3 = 6
d. 3*2 = 6
e. 2^3 = 8
f. 3^2 = 9
g. 2+2 = 4
h. 2*2 = 4
i. 2^2 = 4
j. 3+3 = 6
k. 3*3 = 9
l. 3^3 = 27

These mirror number in turn form further relations relative to other mirror numbers where all numbers exist through all numbers an each number is an extension of 1⊙. The monadic number as an oscillation of itself through further monadic numbers as oscillations observes an inherent repitition of monadic numbers, through monadic numbers as simultaneous extensions of the monadic numbers and acting as self referencing in accords to the monadic numbers they exist through.

All monadic calculus is a proof in itself as the repitition of monadic numbers forming an inherent symmetry resulting in both the statement and the numbers as self referencing absolutes as proofs in themselves.

Each monadic number, as a form/function, cycles to further proofs where all calculations are approximations of the Monad and have an inherent element of randomness. This randomness, where the repitition of structural extensions of the Monad are approximations of it, observes all proofs as both random and having self maintained structure reflecting this randomness through multiple monadic numbers as extensions of eachother and 1.

Each monadic number as a set of infinite numbers observe through a continuum, is in itself a continuum where one monadic number directed towards another is a set of infinite fractals in one respect while simultaneously results in a set of monadic numbers.

Re: Mirror Numbers (Mirror Theory III)

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:52 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
See how important correct grammar is when you wish to be understood?

Re: Mirror Numbers (Mirror Theory III)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 12:27 am
by Eodnhoj7
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:52 pm See how important correct grammar is when you wish to be understood?
I am taking that as you agreeing with the above thread?

Correct grammar is relative to context.

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:55 am
by Davyboi
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:40 pm Oscillatory Numbers

1) All numbers exist through continuums. 1 exists through 2,3,4..., with each number respectively existing through further numbers as a continuum of continuum. This continuous nature to number necessitates not just a number line, but effectively the number as having a directional property.

2) All numbers exist through continuums as continuous functions with the number line as a continuum observing all functions as continuums.

a. 1= 1+1-1, 1+2-2, 1+3-3, 1+4-4, 1+5-5...
b. 1= 2-1, 3-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-5, 7-6...
c. 1= 1*1/1, 1*2/2, 1*3/3, 1*4/4, 1*5/5...
d. 1= 1^1/1, 1^2/2, 1^3/3, 1^4/4, 1^5/5...
f. 1= 2root1, 2root2/2, 2root3/3, 2root4/4...

With infinite variation all showing all number exists as continuums through there inherent functions.

3. The number as composed of continuums, with these continuums existing through arithmetic functions as continuums, observes not just the number as a continuum but the function as a continuum as well where the number as form cannot be seperated from it as a function.

4. All numbers are inseperable from all functions. Hence +1 is inseperable from addition, multiplication and powers. -1 is inseperable from subtraction, division and root.

5. All numbers as form/functions, must exist through further numbers as form/functions, hence all number inherently are directed through themselves as themselves where any replication is strictly an extension of the original mirror "numbers" as a replication of them. The number and the structural extension of that number through further numbers observe all numbers as mirroring as fundamentally oscillcations, progressing to further oscillations as an oscillation.

6. example:

1⊙= the number of oscillation of (2⊙,3⊙)
⧂ = The oscillation of the numbers into further oscillations.

1⊙(2⊙,3⊙) ⧂ (1⊙,2⊙,3⊙,4⊙,5⊙,6⊙,8⊙,9⊙,27⊙)

All numbers as a directive nature observes the directional qualities of the numbers forming new numbers under certain circumstances.
a. 2+3= 5
b. 3+2= 5
c. 2*3 = 6
d. 3*2 = 6
e. 2^3 = 8
f. 3^2 = 9
g. 2+2 = 4
h. 2*2 = 4
i. 2^2 = 4
j. 3+3 = 6
k. 3*3 = 9
l. 3^3 = 27

These mirror number in turn form further relations relative to other mirror numbers where all numbers exist through all numbers an each number is an extension of 1⊙.
Explain it in simple terms please? If you don't mind, It would be appreciated.

Re: Mirror Numbers (Mirror Theory III)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 2:24 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 12:27 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:52 pm See how important correct grammar is when you wish to be understood?
I am taking that as you agreeing with the above thread?

Correct grammar is relative to context.
There's no way of knowing what you mean because the context is so bizarre, so there's no benchmark available.

Re: Mirror Numbers (Mirror Theory III)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 2:29 am
by Eodnhoj7
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 2:24 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 12:27 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:52 pm See how important correct grammar is when you wish to be understood?
I am taking that as you agreeing with the above thread?

Correct grammar is relative to context.
There's no way of knowing what you mean because the context is so bizarre, so there's no benchmark available.
Yes, it is foreign, but view it as the answer to a rational question:

What happens when instead of viewing standard addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, powers and roots as separate from your standard number they are viewed as connected as one and the same?

For example +1 is really 1 and addition as eachother, or 1 and multiplication as eachother.

Where form follows function and function follows form, form and function exist as one with form/function resulting in further form/function.

If everything existed as connected, all localized realities are distortions of this unity.

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 4:40 am
by Eodnhoj7
Davyboi wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:55 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:40 pm Oscillatory Numbers

1) All numbers exist through continuums. 1 exists through 2,3,4..., with each number respectively existing through further numbers as a continuum of continuum. This continuous nature to number necessitates not just a number line, but effectively the number as having a directional property.

2) All numbers exist through continuums as continuous functions with the number line as a continuum observing all functions as continuums.

a. 1= 1+1-1, 1+2-2, 1+3-3, 1+4-4, 1+5-5...
b. 1= 2-1, 3-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-5, 7-6...
c. 1= 1*1/1, 1*2/2, 1*3/3, 1*4/4, 1*5/5...
d. 1= 1^1/1, 1^2/2, 1^3/3, 1^4/4, 1^5/5...
f. 1= 2root1, 2root2/2, 2root3/3, 2root4/4...

With infinite variation all showing all number exists as continuums through there inherent functions.

3. The number as composed of continuums, with these continuums existing through arithmetic functions as continuums, observes not just the number as a continuum but the function as a continuum as well where the number as form cannot be seperated from it as a function.

4. All numbers are inseperable from all functions. Hence +1 is inseperable from addition, multiplication and powers. -1 is inseperable from subtraction, division and root.

5. All numbers as form/functions, must exist through further numbers as form/functions, hence all number inherently are directed through themselves as themselves where any replication is strictly an extension of the original mirror "numbers" as a replication of them. The number and the structural extension of that number through further numbers observe all numbers as mirroring as fundamentally oscillcations, progressing to further oscillations as an oscillation.

6. example:

1⊙= the number of oscillation of (2⊙,3⊙)
⧂ = The oscillation of the numbers into further oscillations.

1⊙(2⊙,3⊙) ⧂ (1⊙,2⊙,3⊙,4⊙,5⊙,6⊙,8⊙,9⊙,27⊙)

All numbers as a directive nature observes the directional qualities of the numbers forming new numbers under certain circumstances.
a. 2+3= 5
b. 3+2= 5
c. 2*3 = 6
d. 3*2 = 6
e. 2^3 = 8
f. 3^2 = 9
g. 2+2 = 4
h. 2*2 = 4
i. 2^2 = 4
j. 3+3 = 6
k. 3*3 = 9
l. 3^3 = 27

These mirror number in turn form further relations relative to other mirror numbers where all numbers exist through all numbers an each number is an extension of 1⊙.
Explain it in simple terms please? If you don't mind, It would be appreciated.
Well give me a starting point relative to what you understand.

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 5:52 pm
by Davyboi
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 4:40 am
Davyboi wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:55 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:40 pm Oscillatory Numbers

1) All numbers exist through continuums. 1 exists through 2,3,4..., with each number respectively existing through further numbers as a continuum of continuum. This continuous nature to number necessitates not just a number line, but effectively the number as having a directional property.

2) All numbers exist through continuums as continuous functions with the number line as a continuum observing all functions as continuums.

a. 1= 1+1-1, 1+2-2, 1+3-3, 1+4-4, 1+5-5...
b. 1= 2-1, 3-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-5, 7-6...
c. 1= 1*1/1, 1*2/2, 1*3/3, 1*4/4, 1*5/5...
d. 1= 1^1/1, 1^2/2, 1^3/3, 1^4/4, 1^5/5...
f. 1= 2root1, 2root2/2, 2root3/3, 2root4/4...

With infinite variation all showing all number exists as continuums through there inherent functions.

3. The number as composed of continuums, with these continuums existing through arithmetic functions as continuums, observes not just the number as a continuum but the function as a continuum as well where the number as form cannot be seperated from it as a function.

4. All numbers are inseperable from all functions. Hence +1 is inseperable from addition, multiplication and powers. -1 is inseperable from subtraction, division and root.

5. All numbers as form/functions, must exist through further numbers as form/functions, hence all number inherently are directed through themselves as themselves where any replication is strictly an extension of the original mirror "numbers" as a replication of them. The number and the structural extension of that number through further numbers observe all numbers as mirroring as fundamentally oscillcations, progressing to further oscillations as an oscillation.

6. example:

1⊙= the number of oscillation of (2⊙,3⊙)
⧂ = The oscillation of the numbers into further oscillations.

1⊙(2⊙,3⊙) ⧂ (1⊙,2⊙,3⊙,4⊙,5⊙,6⊙,8⊙,9⊙,27⊙)

All numbers as a directive nature observes the directional qualities of the numbers forming new numbers under certain circumstances.
a. 2+3= 5
b. 3+2= 5
c. 2*3 = 6
d. 3*2 = 6
e. 2^3 = 8
f. 3^2 = 9
g. 2+2 = 4
h. 2*2 = 4
i. 2^2 = 4
j. 3+3 = 6
k. 3*3 = 9
l. 3^3 = 27

These mirror number in turn form further relations relative to other mirror numbers where all numbers exist through all numbers an each number is an extension of 1⊙.
Explain it in simple terms please? If you don't mind, It would be appreciated.
Well give me a starting point relative to what you understand.
At the start please, I might sound thick, but I don't understand what you are describing or trying to explain..that doesn't mean Im not interested, if you don't mind please, can you suggest any threads or sources that can give me the basic theory and information about this.
Many thanks david

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:32 pm
by Eodnhoj7
Davyboi wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 5:52 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 4:40 am
Davyboi wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:55 am
Explain it in simple terms please? If you don't mind, It would be appreciated.
Well give me a starting point relative to what you understand.
At the start please, I might sound thick, but I don't understand what you are describing or trying to explain..that doesn't mean Im not interested, if you don't mind please, can you suggest any threads or sources that can give me the basic theory and information about this.
Many thanks david
It is an argument, all numbers exist as continuums and as continuums the number is inseperable from their function through which they exist.

2 = 1+1, 1+2-1, 1+3-2,...

where 2 = an infinite continuum of addition and subtraction through a continual number line with the number line composing 2.

This is presupposed in basic arithmetic, except where the number is separate from addition or subtraction, the number is actually inseperable.

So what we understand of all numbers as continuums, are that all numbers are directional in nature (through the number lines which manifest them) with this directional nature to number as infinite movement making the number as an active function where it is additive, subtractive, multipicative, divisive, powers and root by there direction to further numbers.

Think of numbers as continual movements.

For example if I observe the statement 3-2=1, what I am observing is:

(+3 → -2) → +1
(+3 → -2) ← +1
(+3 ← -2) → +1
(+3 ← -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) → +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ⇄ +1

Numbers as directional cycle through eachother and exist as oscillations. We can observe this in the thread,

viewtopic.php?f=16&t=25295

where cycles are universal. Take this concept and apply to number as well, rather than a strict linear only thinking.

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:42 pm
by Davyboi
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:32 pm
Davyboi wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 5:52 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 4:40 am
Well give me a starting point relative to what you understand.
At the start please, I might sound thick, but I don't understand what you are describing or trying to explain..that doesn't mean Im not interested, if you don't mind please, can you suggest any threads or sources that can give me the basic theory and information about this.
Many thanks david
It is an argument, all numbers exist as continuums and as continuums the number is inseperable from their function through which they exist.

2 = 1+1, 1+2-1, 1+3-2,...

where 2 = an infinite continuum of addition and subtraction through a continual number line with the number line composing 2.

This is presupposed in basic arithmetic, except where the number is separate from addition or subtraction, the number is actually inseperable.

So what we understand of all numbers as continuums, are that all numbers are directional in nature (through the number lines which manifest them) with this directional nature to number as infinite movement making the number as an active function where it is additive, subtractive, multipicative, divisive, powers and root by there direction to further numbers.

Think of numbers as continual movements.

For example if I observe the statement 3-2=1, what I am observing is:

(+3 → -2) → +1
(+3 → -2) ← +1
(+3 ← -2) → +1
(+3 ← -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) → +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ⇄ +1

Numbers as directional cycle through eachother and exist as oscillations. We can observe this in the thread,

viewtopic.php?f=16&t=25295

where cycles are universal. Take this concept and apply to number as well, rather than a strict linear only thinking.
But I am just not getting what you are explaining, it's frustrating me, i haven't come across this before. My igronance, I apologize mate.do me a favour and send me the information on the theory. So I can Google it, and get a basic understanding. Nice one, much appreciated

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2018 10:24 pm
by Eodnhoj7
Davyboi wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:42 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:32 pm
Davyboi wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 5:52 pm
At the start please, I might sound thick, but I don't understand what you are describing or trying to explain..that doesn't mean Im not interested, if you don't mind please, can you suggest any threads or sources that can give me the basic theory and information about this.
Many thanks david
It is an argument, all numbers exist as continuums and as continuums the number is inseperable from their function through which they exist.

2 = 1+1, 1+2-1, 1+3-2,...

where 2 = an infinite continuum of addition and subtraction through a continual number line with the number line composing 2.

This is presupposed in basic arithmetic, except where the number is separate from addition or subtraction, the number is actually inseperable.

So what we understand of all numbers as continuums, are that all numbers are directional in nature (through the number lines which manifest them) with this directional nature to number as infinite movement making the number as an active function where it is additive, subtractive, multipicative, divisive, powers and root by there direction to further numbers.

Think of numbers as continual movements.

For example if I observe the statement 3-2=1, what I am observing is:

(+3 → -2) → +1
(+3 → -2) ← +1
(+3 ← -2) → +1
(+3 ← -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) → +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ⇄ +1

Numbers as directional cycle through eachother and exist as oscillations. We can observe this in the thread,

viewtopic.php?f=16&t=25295

where cycles are universal. Take this concept and apply to number as well, rather than a strict linear only thinking.
But I am just not getting what you are explaining, it's frustrating me, i haven't come across this before. My igronance, I apologize mate.do me a favour and send me the information on the theory. So I can Google it, and get a basic understanding. Nice one, much appreciated
The information is there.

Let's start with a simple question and work on it from there:

1 = ?

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 11:58 am
by Arising_uk
1?

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:39 pm
by TimeSeeker
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 10:24 pm 1 = ?
It is still subject to the symbol grounding problem ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol_grounding_problem )

f(x) = 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monad_(fu ... ogramming)

Can you point me to any function in reality which has such properties? I can't.

The Universe maybe.

What is X? Matter? Energy? No idea :)

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:46 pm
by TimeSeeker
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:32 pm (+3 → -2) → +1
(+3 → -2) ← +1
(+3 ← -2) → +1
(+3 ← -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) → +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ← +1
(+3 ⇄ -2) ⇄ +1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_computing

But your use of ⇄ is ambiguous.

(+3 ⇄ -2) ⇄ +1
(+4 ⇄ -3) ⇄ +1

(+4 ⇄ -3) ⇄ (+3 ⇄ -2)
+4 ⇄ -3 ⇄ +3 ⇄ -2

What? :)

Re: Monadic Numbers (Monadic Calculus)

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 6:28 pm
by Eodnhoj7
TimeSeeker wrote: Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:39 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 10:24 pm 1 = ?
It is still subject to the symbol grounding problem ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol_grounding_problem )

f(x) = 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monad_(fu ... ogramming)

Can you point me to any function in reality which has such properties? I can't.

The Universe maybe.

What is X? Matter? Energy? No idea :)
Well you answered it yourself, one is a function...what is a function?