Philosophy Now Forum

Is infinity a quantity?

Argument

A line is an infinite quality as 1 direction with this infinite direction as 1 being composed of multiple line as 1 infinity in themselves.

Hence infinity, through the line as one considering one premised in empirical qualities observes all numbers as an observation of linear qualities through time as directive in nature.

The line as 1 is infinity as 1 with one itself being infinite in the respect it is continuous as existing through itself as itself. We can observe that a line as 1 through 0d space or void must effectively projects if it is to exist. However considering the line has nowhere to project but must project to something if it is to maintain its nature, the line must effectively fold through itself by multiplying in directions.

In these respects the 1 original line as infinite must individuals into multiple lines which each line being a ratio relative to each other and the original line while being infinite and one in itself. Finiteness is strictly the relation of infinities with infinity, as an absence of finiteness, being an absence of relation with infinity and finiteness existing at the same time in different respects due to there positive and negative qualities.

Not only is infinity quantifiable but there is one infinity and multiple infinities with these multiple infinities being the premise for finiteness or time.

In simpler terms the 1 directional nature of the infinite line shows infinity it only as quantifiable but effectively existing as a limit.

Infinite lines don’t exist in practice.

They are quantized down to Planck scale and no further.

Still. Mathematicians distinguish between countable and uncountable infinities.

TimeSeeker wrote:
Infinite lines dont exist in practice

They are quantized down to Planck scale and no further

Is the Planck scale truly the absolute minimum or only as far as can currently be measured ?
And what is the scientific reason why it cannot be infinite regress if the Planck is the limit ?

surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:39 pm

TimeSeeker wrote:
Infinite lines dont exist in practice

They are quantized down to Planck scale and no further

Is the Planck scale truly the absolute minimum or only as far as can currently be measured ?
And what is the scientific reason why it cannot be infinite regress if the Planck is the limit ?

Pirate monads that walk the Planck are shark food... appetizers really, but shark food nonetheless...

-Imp

TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:04 pm Infinite lines don’t exist in practice.

They are quantized down to Planck scale and no further.

Still. Mathematicians distinguish between countable and uncountable infinities.

The Planck scale

1) Is strictly probabilistic in the respect it is not just empirical but is a reflection of our current means of technology which by nature progresses.

2) The Planck scale, as a unit of measurement, as a unit observes a foundation of measurement which much extend to further Planck units. Phenomena a may be 1 unit, b 2 units, so on and so forth. The plank scale is progressive in nature.

3) THE Planck scale is a line. A line is composed of infinite 0d points with all 0d points existing between lines, hence the line is composed of infinite lines as one line. In these respects the line as infinite lines is a countable infinity as one line. Uncountable infinities, or uncountable lines, are infinite infinites. You are right with what mathematicians reference but is still is a bandwagon fallacy and argument from authority. The mathematicians believe what the mathematicians believe...mathematics is a belief in symmetry as fee can agree what it is...

surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:39 pm

TimeSeeker wrote:
Infinite lines dont exist in practice

They are quantized down to Planck scale and no further

Is the Planck scale truly the absolute minimum or only as far as can currently be measured ?
And what is the scientific reason why it cannot be infinite regress if the Planck is the limit ?

Legitimate questions scientists would not want to ponder because it would make them look stupid for not being able to think deep...even though any deep thinker would know thought really has no depth...

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 1:33 am

surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:39 pm

TimeSeeker wrote:
Infinite lines dont exist in practice

They are quantized down to Planck scale and no further

Is the Planck scale truly the absolute minimum or only as far as can currently be measured ?
And what is the scientific reason why it cannot be infinite regress if the Planck is the limit ?

Legitimate questions scientists would not want to ponder because it would make them look stupid for not being able to think deep...even though any deep thinker would no thought really has no depth...

There is no difference in practice. if you can't measure more accurately you can't think any more 'deeply'.

Anything you THINK about below Planck scale is IMAGINED. Naturally - you are allowed to imagine, but do your homework on what happens if that number was different

TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 6:36 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 1:33 am

surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:39 pm

Is the Planck scale truly the absolute minimum or only as far as can currently be measured ?
And what is the scientific reason why it cannot be infinite regress if the Planck is the limit ?

Legitimate questions scientists would not want to ponder because it would make them look stupid for not being able to think deep...even though any deep thinker would no thought really has no depth...

There is no difference in practice. if you can't measure more accurately you can't think any more 'deeply'.

Anything you THINK about below Planck scale is IMAGINED. Naturally - you are allowed to imagine, but do your homework on what happens if that number was different

Actually it is not imagination but strictly a law of relation, parts exist through parts, with all parts existing as composed of or composing further parts. The planck scale is subject to the principle of relativity and such is incomplete on its own terms and can only be viewed as an axiom of measurement which exists relative to other axioms as focal points of awareness.

The planck scale is imaginary in seperate respect as it is an "imaging" of how we see the world and give form it it.