The Point, Line, Circle as the Foundation of All Phenomenon; Hence Definition of God as Proof of God
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:09 pm
Presented argument
ALL phenomena exist through the point, line and circle.
1. What we understand of abstract and physical phenomena is the composition of limits. The question of "what is limit?"
Referencing back to the nature of phenomena we can observe that all phenomena project past their origins to form further phenomena with this phenomena being composed of and composing further phenomena. In these respects phenomena are extradimensional as they project past themselves and are directive in nature with this continuous expansion observing movement. These phenomena as directed away from other phenomena observes the phenomena as definitive.
In a separate respect phenomena are directed towards themselves as one phenomena directed towards another phenomena is in turn directed back towards itself. In these respects phenomena are intradimensional as they are directed towards themselves and are directive in nature with this continual circular alternation observing movement. These phenomena as directed towards eachother as a phenomena observes the phenomena as self maintaining.
Under these premises all limit exists as directed movement.
2. The question of limit, in turn as directed movement, observes all phenomena as composed of limits in turn existing through limits as limits where the foundation of the phenomena as limits observing the foundation of the phenomena being further phenomena equating the phenomena to a limit in itself.
Under these terms a dualism occurs between the phenomena and the limit where the phenomena is a complex set of limits and the limit as a simple form of phenomena. These terms can be dually reversed where a phenomena is a simple form of limit and the limit itself is a complex version of the phenomenon. This alternation can cause confusion unless looking at the premises which define them: simplicity and complexity.
3. The question occurs as to what simplicity and complexity "is"? Considering both phenomena and limit are determined by directed movment, with one being foundation for the other. A limit directed through itself results in the phenomena as complex limits, and vice versa, where the premise for simplicity can be observed a Unity, or movement towards unity. Complexity as unity existing through unity, resulting in a multiplicity, observes complexity as a form of multiplicity or a movement towards multiplicity.
4. This dualism of unity and multiplicity, observed through the limits of simplicity and complexity leads to the question of "unity and multiplicity"? Cycling back to tne premise of limits being simple phenomena and phenomena being complex limits, it may be observed that:
A. Simple limits are directed towards complex phenomena, which in themselves are multiple limits. Unity is directed towards multiplicity in these respects.
With the phenomena being directed towards complex phenomena/limits further, it may be dually observed that unified simplicity is directed towards complex multiplicity, with this multiplicity of unified simples directed to further complex multiplicities as complex multiplicities. In these respect multiplicity is directed towards unity.
The directive quality of unity towards multiplicity, and vice versa observes that unity and multiplicity are extradimensional limits in themselves where this extradimensionality is conducive to a form of separation.
In a separate respect the alternation of phenomena observes an inherent connection as the direction of one phenomena to another, with the phenomena being directed towards the original again, reflecting the phenomena are directed towards each other and through each other as one. The apparent multiplicity of the phenomena is an approximation of unity through connectivity.
The direction of one phenomena to another observes separation. The direction of each phenomena towards each other, through each other as one, shows a connection.
In these respects simplicity as unity is connection. Complexity as multiplicity is seperation.
B. In a separate respect unity directed towards multiplicity which then in turn is directed towards unity, observed unity as intradimensionally directed. The same occurs for multiplicity. The self directed movement of unity through unity observes simplicity as maintainance. The self directed movement of multiplicity through multiplicity observes complexity as dissolution.
C. Limits exist through a dualism of connection and seperation and another dualism of maintainance and dissolution, with connection/separation being composed of extradimensional directed movement and maintainance/dissolution being composed of intradimensional directed movement.
5. Considering connection/separation exist through extradimensionality and maintainance/dissolution exist through intradimensionally, with these duals existing as directed movement, we are left which the question are extradimensional and intradimensional limits?
The extradimensional limit can be observed through the line as connector/separator.
A. As connector between phenomena directed towards each other through each other as each other the line is absent of direction. In these respects it is -1 dimensional as absent of direction.
B. As separator of phenomena directed past phenomena as a phenomena the line is strictly 1 dimensional.
C. The separation as a form of complex multiplicity observes the line as a locality, conducive to a unit as an approximation of unity (considering unity and multiplicity are connected). The connection as a form of simple unity observes the line as potential locality, conducive to unity as no direction
The line as both connection and separation observes the line as definition.
The intradimensional limit can be observed through the circle as maintainer/dissolution.
A. As the maintainer of phenomena directed towards each other through each other, the circle exists as absent of direction. In these respects the circle is intradimensional and simple unity.
***elaborate
B. As the dissolver of phenomena directed away from phenomena as a phenomena, the circle exists as all direction through expansion or contraction. In these respectd the circle is extradimensional and complex multiplicity.
C. The line and the circle exist as both one and many.
C1. The 1d line as extradimensional exists through the circle as expansion and contraction with the circle in turn existing as 1d through the line.
C2. The -1d line as intradimensional exists through the circle with the circle in turn existing through the -1d line.
C3. The circle as projected to further circles exists through the 1d line as extradimensional.
C4. The circle connected to further circles exists through the absence of the extradimensional line as the intrsdimensional -1d line.
C5. The 1d line as projecting towards further lines exists through the circle by alternation as maintainance of the line.
C6. The 1d line as projecting towards further line exists through the circle by alternation as the dissolution of the line into multiple lines.
6. Considering all limits/phenomena exists through connection/separation and maintanence/dissolution through the line and circle as directed movements we can observe these limits as the foundation of qualities exist as quantities (see 1 as infinity argument) through unity and multiplicity considering the premise of quality and quantity as phenomena in turn exist as directed movements, hence limits.
The nature of quality and quantity as limits in turn observes them both as connected and self maintained, hence unity as one, while maintaining there distinctively separate qualities. The question of the "limit" as line and circle in turn gives premise to the question: "What is the origin of the limits of the line and circle, hence all phenomena?".
Using the directive nature of logic itself where all exists as unified, we can observe the origins of the line and circle stemming from the point under the standard definition of euclidian geometry. The question of the point as origin of limit, with limit being directed movement, lends itself to the question of the origin of directed movement.
Considering the point as origin, is the origin of simply unity and complex multiplicity, what we can observe is the point as
A. pure being as directed movement, hence pure directed movement with this definition being an approximation of the point through multiple terms, but most axiomatically observed through itself as itself or under the terms "All", "Tao", "God", "I", etc. The point as point through point effectively makes it 1 dimensional as intradimensional, considering any extradimensionality would still have it directed through itself.
Hence the -1d line existing as the connection of phenomena, observe A the -1d line as an approximation of one point through multiple points with the line itself being composed of infinite 1d points as absent of point making the point as both limit and no limit.
The -1d circle as fundamentally directionless observes the -1d lines forming the circle as 1d point connected necessitates the circle as an approximation of the 1d point as 1d point.
Inversely to the 1d point, as pure being effectively, is "void" or "nothingness" as 0 dimensionality. Considering only being exists and nothingness cancels itself out as "void of void" only being exists with 0d point space effectively being a veil which covers the 1d point approximating it through multiplicity, with multiplicity being an inversion of unity and the inversion of multilpicity being unit as unity.
Hence the 0d point exists as inversion where the 1d lines existence through continual projection exists if and only if it individuate into further lines through which the line exists. The circle exists through inversion of 1d contraction or 1d expansion and the inversion of one circle into many.
The point as origin exists as both All and Void with the point as no limit being beyond both as both and neither.
7. The point In turn exists through the line and circle, with the line existing through the circle and point and the circle existing through the line and point as 3 in 1 and one in 3.
*****
A. The 1d point composes the -1d line.
B. The 1d point composes the -1d circle.
C. The 1d Point composes the 1d point.
D. The 1d Point composes the 1d line.
E. The 1d point composes the 1d (2d) circle.
F. The 1d point composes the 0d point.
G. The 0d point composes the 1d line.
H. The 0d point composes the 1d (2d) circle.
I. The 0d point composes the 0d point.
J. The 0d point composes the 1d point.
K. The 0d point composes the -1d Line.
L. The 0d point composes the -1d Circle.
*****
Being/Void, connection/separation and maintainance/dissolving exist through the point, line and circle as both quantity/quality through extradimensionality/interdimensionality as limits conducive to directed movement. The Prime Triad exists through all phenomena and is all phenomena with all phenomena being composed of it.
What we understand of the basic nature of reasoning stems from this foundation with this foundation not just being universally axiomatic but beyond axiomatic as it completely subjective and objective through the Prime Triad.
ALL phenomena exist through the point, line and circle.
1. What we understand of abstract and physical phenomena is the composition of limits. The question of "what is limit?"
Referencing back to the nature of phenomena we can observe that all phenomena project past their origins to form further phenomena with this phenomena being composed of and composing further phenomena. In these respects phenomena are extradimensional as they project past themselves and are directive in nature with this continuous expansion observing movement. These phenomena as directed away from other phenomena observes the phenomena as definitive.
In a separate respect phenomena are directed towards themselves as one phenomena directed towards another phenomena is in turn directed back towards itself. In these respects phenomena are intradimensional as they are directed towards themselves and are directive in nature with this continual circular alternation observing movement. These phenomena as directed towards eachother as a phenomena observes the phenomena as self maintaining.
Under these premises all limit exists as directed movement.
2. The question of limit, in turn as directed movement, observes all phenomena as composed of limits in turn existing through limits as limits where the foundation of the phenomena as limits observing the foundation of the phenomena being further phenomena equating the phenomena to a limit in itself.
Under these terms a dualism occurs between the phenomena and the limit where the phenomena is a complex set of limits and the limit as a simple form of phenomena. These terms can be dually reversed where a phenomena is a simple form of limit and the limit itself is a complex version of the phenomenon. This alternation can cause confusion unless looking at the premises which define them: simplicity and complexity.
3. The question occurs as to what simplicity and complexity "is"? Considering both phenomena and limit are determined by directed movment, with one being foundation for the other. A limit directed through itself results in the phenomena as complex limits, and vice versa, where the premise for simplicity can be observed a Unity, or movement towards unity. Complexity as unity existing through unity, resulting in a multiplicity, observes complexity as a form of multiplicity or a movement towards multiplicity.
4. This dualism of unity and multiplicity, observed through the limits of simplicity and complexity leads to the question of "unity and multiplicity"? Cycling back to tne premise of limits being simple phenomena and phenomena being complex limits, it may be observed that:
A. Simple limits are directed towards complex phenomena, which in themselves are multiple limits. Unity is directed towards multiplicity in these respects.
With the phenomena being directed towards complex phenomena/limits further, it may be dually observed that unified simplicity is directed towards complex multiplicity, with this multiplicity of unified simples directed to further complex multiplicities as complex multiplicities. In these respect multiplicity is directed towards unity.
The directive quality of unity towards multiplicity, and vice versa observes that unity and multiplicity are extradimensional limits in themselves where this extradimensionality is conducive to a form of separation.
In a separate respect the alternation of phenomena observes an inherent connection as the direction of one phenomena to another, with the phenomena being directed towards the original again, reflecting the phenomena are directed towards each other and through each other as one. The apparent multiplicity of the phenomena is an approximation of unity through connectivity.
The direction of one phenomena to another observes separation. The direction of each phenomena towards each other, through each other as one, shows a connection.
In these respects simplicity as unity is connection. Complexity as multiplicity is seperation.
B. In a separate respect unity directed towards multiplicity which then in turn is directed towards unity, observed unity as intradimensionally directed. The same occurs for multiplicity. The self directed movement of unity through unity observes simplicity as maintainance. The self directed movement of multiplicity through multiplicity observes complexity as dissolution.
C. Limits exist through a dualism of connection and seperation and another dualism of maintainance and dissolution, with connection/separation being composed of extradimensional directed movement and maintainance/dissolution being composed of intradimensional directed movement.
5. Considering connection/separation exist through extradimensionality and maintainance/dissolution exist through intradimensionally, with these duals existing as directed movement, we are left which the question are extradimensional and intradimensional limits?
The extradimensional limit can be observed through the line as connector/separator.
A. As connector between phenomena directed towards each other through each other as each other the line is absent of direction. In these respects it is -1 dimensional as absent of direction.
B. As separator of phenomena directed past phenomena as a phenomena the line is strictly 1 dimensional.
C. The separation as a form of complex multiplicity observes the line as a locality, conducive to a unit as an approximation of unity (considering unity and multiplicity are connected). The connection as a form of simple unity observes the line as potential locality, conducive to unity as no direction
The line as both connection and separation observes the line as definition.
The intradimensional limit can be observed through the circle as maintainer/dissolution.
A. As the maintainer of phenomena directed towards each other through each other, the circle exists as absent of direction. In these respects the circle is intradimensional and simple unity.
***elaborate
B. As the dissolver of phenomena directed away from phenomena as a phenomena, the circle exists as all direction through expansion or contraction. In these respectd the circle is extradimensional and complex multiplicity.
C. The line and the circle exist as both one and many.
C1. The 1d line as extradimensional exists through the circle as expansion and contraction with the circle in turn existing as 1d through the line.
C2. The -1d line as intradimensional exists through the circle with the circle in turn existing through the -1d line.
C3. The circle as projected to further circles exists through the 1d line as extradimensional.
C4. The circle connected to further circles exists through the absence of the extradimensional line as the intrsdimensional -1d line.
C5. The 1d line as projecting towards further lines exists through the circle by alternation as maintainance of the line.
C6. The 1d line as projecting towards further line exists through the circle by alternation as the dissolution of the line into multiple lines.
6. Considering all limits/phenomena exists through connection/separation and maintanence/dissolution through the line and circle as directed movements we can observe these limits as the foundation of qualities exist as quantities (see 1 as infinity argument) through unity and multiplicity considering the premise of quality and quantity as phenomena in turn exist as directed movements, hence limits.
The nature of quality and quantity as limits in turn observes them both as connected and self maintained, hence unity as one, while maintaining there distinctively separate qualities. The question of the "limit" as line and circle in turn gives premise to the question: "What is the origin of the limits of the line and circle, hence all phenomena?".
Using the directive nature of logic itself where all exists as unified, we can observe the origins of the line and circle stemming from the point under the standard definition of euclidian geometry. The question of the point as origin of limit, with limit being directed movement, lends itself to the question of the origin of directed movement.
Considering the point as origin, is the origin of simply unity and complex multiplicity, what we can observe is the point as
A. pure being as directed movement, hence pure directed movement with this definition being an approximation of the point through multiple terms, but most axiomatically observed through itself as itself or under the terms "All", "Tao", "God", "I", etc. The point as point through point effectively makes it 1 dimensional as intradimensional, considering any extradimensionality would still have it directed through itself.
Hence the -1d line existing as the connection of phenomena, observe A the -1d line as an approximation of one point through multiple points with the line itself being composed of infinite 1d points as absent of point making the point as both limit and no limit.
The -1d circle as fundamentally directionless observes the -1d lines forming the circle as 1d point connected necessitates the circle as an approximation of the 1d point as 1d point.
Inversely to the 1d point, as pure being effectively, is "void" or "nothingness" as 0 dimensionality. Considering only being exists and nothingness cancels itself out as "void of void" only being exists with 0d point space effectively being a veil which covers the 1d point approximating it through multiplicity, with multiplicity being an inversion of unity and the inversion of multilpicity being unit as unity.
Hence the 0d point exists as inversion where the 1d lines existence through continual projection exists if and only if it individuate into further lines through which the line exists. The circle exists through inversion of 1d contraction or 1d expansion and the inversion of one circle into many.
The point as origin exists as both All and Void with the point as no limit being beyond both as both and neither.
7. The point In turn exists through the line and circle, with the line existing through the circle and point and the circle existing through the line and point as 3 in 1 and one in 3.
*****
A. The 1d point composes the -1d line.
B. The 1d point composes the -1d circle.
C. The 1d Point composes the 1d point.
D. The 1d Point composes the 1d line.
E. The 1d point composes the 1d (2d) circle.
F. The 1d point composes the 0d point.
G. The 0d point composes the 1d line.
H. The 0d point composes the 1d (2d) circle.
I. The 0d point composes the 0d point.
J. The 0d point composes the 1d point.
K. The 0d point composes the -1d Line.
L. The 0d point composes the -1d Circle.
*****
Being/Void, connection/separation and maintainance/dissolving exist through the point, line and circle as both quantity/quality through extradimensionality/interdimensionality as limits conducive to directed movement. The Prime Triad exists through all phenomena and is all phenomena with all phenomena being composed of it.
What we understand of the basic nature of reasoning stems from this foundation with this foundation not just being universally axiomatic but beyond axiomatic as it completely subjective and objective through the Prime Triad.